I love that you referred to him as “personality Tucker Carlson”, negating any notion of him being a bona fide journalist.
I liked that too. Now we should omit the word “news” in any sentence that mentions Fox.
"Fox Gossip: All the News That's Not Fit to Print"
and that they might get sued for if they did.
All the news that's $h!t to print.
We're gettin' there: "Fox Spews All the News that's $h!t to Print!"
Just think of the circulation figures of the "newspapers" that you pick up at the supermarket check-out desk.
Prop Fox (propaganda)
Fox Spews
Ooh, Imogene. When combined with mine: "Fox Spews All The News That's Not Fit to Print"!!
In the UK Fox CANNOT refer to themselves as a news organization AT ALL. They are entertainment.
Entertainment only for masochists.
Me to. What a dig! Luv it
Actually, I think the correct category is "angertainment". Pat, I'll take that category for $200. /snark
Angertainment! Absolutely spot-on perfect. Well done.
I love that you referred to him as “personality Tucker Carlson”, negating any notion of him being a bona fide journalist.
I liked that too. Now we should omit the word “news” in any sentence that mentions Fox.
"Fox Gossip: All the News That's Not Fit to Print"
and that they might get sued for if they did.
All the news that's $h!t to print.
We're gettin' there: "Fox Spews All the News that's $h!t to Print!"
Just think of the circulation figures of the "newspapers" that you pick up at the supermarket check-out desk.
Prop Fox (propaganda)
Fox Spews
Ooh, Imogene. When combined with mine: "Fox Spews All The News That's Not Fit to Print"!!
In the UK Fox CANNOT refer to themselves as a news organization AT ALL. They are entertainment.
Entertainment only for masochists.
Me to. What a dig! Luv it
Actually, I think the correct category is "angertainment". Pat, I'll take that category for $200. /snark
Angertainment! Absolutely spot-on perfect. Well done.