800 Comments
User's avatar
Dutch Mike's avatar

So after 4 years of Bidenomics, the Orange Clown gives us a Trumpcession - within a mere 2 months.

Maybe now the billionaire-owned press wish they had written something positive about Biden…

Expand full comment
J L Graham's avatar

I'm not sure it's penetrated yet. Visions of tax cuts dance though their heads.

Expand full comment
GJ Loft ME CA FL IL NE CT MI's avatar

I'm not so sure the math is working well for the tax cuts. Of course, they never really did. The value of their portfolios is dropping like a rock. If you're a billionaire and your net worth drops by 10%, it gonna take a lot of years for the savings in taxes to offset a loss of $100 million or more. And most of the stocks will bounce back when Trump is gone. But are greedy rich white men really that patient?

Expand full comment
Leigh Horne's avatar

Think of the phenomenon of greed itself. Most psychologists think it's a form of avoidance related to inner insecurities (akin to feeling er, small, as in "Whose got the biggest one?). It functions like all addictions, in that the addict can never get enough of anything. Trump once bragged to an adoring crowd, while flapping his tiny little hands, that "I'm just greedy, greedy greedy." I mean, you could hardly make any of this stuff up. None of it is rational.

Expand full comment
Ruth Sheets's avatar

Leigh, it still astounds me that someone like Trump, a lousy businessman has been able to project himself as something great, worthy of being president and can lie as he did in his first term over 33,000 times in public yet people will still believe his blatant lies and not the few true things he says. People really are nuts!

Expand full comment
Bill Corbett's avatar

Propaganda, and Fox has been very good at it.

More lies = more viewers = more $$$.

Fuck the country and what it stands for just, "Show Me the Money".

Expand full comment
Ruth Sheets's avatar

Bill, it does make me really sad to realize that money seems to be the only factor that matters to so many people. So many folks are still wrapped in the ridiculous "lives of the rich and famous" BS and keep dreaming themselves into those scenarios rather than actually living their lives and trying to, with others, make life better where they are, not super wealthy in giant mansions or on huge yachts.

Expand full comment
Nancy Lent Lanoue's avatar

Bill, when are Murdoch related corporations going to take a dive? Investors might start dumping when they take a closer look at their portfolios. 🦊 is complicit.

Expand full comment
Fran McCullough's avatar

For me the most memorable quote from that Fox interview with the Education Dept Demolition Queen was her assurance to the interviewer that she had not fired any of "the good people". It turned out that the vast majority were part of the DEI cohort, Blacks and women. I'm sort of glad the Black Lives Matter site was erased - it confirms the Trump policy, they don't matter.

Expand full comment
Judith Smith 1111's avatar

Ruth Sheets -- Speaking of someone who is 'worthy of being president' (POTUS), three people spring immediately to mind: Pete Buttigieg, Amy Klobuchar and Gretchen Whitmer. There are probably others, but these three are outstanding in my mind.

Expand full comment
Gail Harris's avatar

WE had a chance… Harris and Walz….. and we WILL again….

Expand full comment
Dale Rowett's avatar

Klobuchar has put one foot over the line delineating the Dark Side and no longer deserves Democratic support. She voted YES to confirm several of the sewer clowns in Trump's cabinet, including Marco Rubio and Doug Burgum. Other than early onset dementia, there's no excuse for that.

Expand full comment
Carol Stanton (FL)'s avatar

Hi Judith....I would add Antony Blinken.

Expand full comment
MaryPat's avatar

This Michigander votes for Pete and Gretchen! So cool we all automatically know them by their first names!

Expand full comment
Sophia Demas's avatar

I would also like to add Dan Goldman of NY to the list.

Expand full comment
Ricardo Grinbank's avatar

Ruth, thanks for proposing those three great examples of very worthy people. We know that to name all of those that fit your description would take days. Thanks for your comment.

Expand full comment
Ruth Sheets's avatar

Judith, I like all your nominees. Now how do we get them elected when it may well be that our vote tallying systems have been compromised in favor of whoever or whatever Republicans choose to run, if we are even able to vote again?

Expand full comment
Mark Chatfield's avatar

As a Radically Independent Moderate I'd like to see a split ticket (D&R) (R&D) or a new party of Moderates Who Get the Job Done!

Expand full comment
Monroe Morgret's avatar

Trump's success proves that the power of White Resentment should never be underestimated. And now he is going to fulfill his promise to Make America Hate Again.

Expand full comment
Stephanie Banks's avatar

Of course, Trump is not an investor, hence does not understand the stock market. He's only been a (failed) developer....

Expand full comment
Harvey Kravetz's avatar

Ruth, his supporters are cultists. Despite everything known about him—including his ties to Russia—they revere him with blind devotion. That’s the very definition of a cult.

Expand full comment
Ricardo Grinbank's avatar

Also it's a definition of stupidity Harvey.

Expand full comment
Gigi's avatar

Here’s some nuts—-The Democrats knew there would be lies at the big speech and they sat through it instead of walking out with Rep Green. That would have been great free publicity. And the DNC keeps asking for money! It’s past time for the minority. Leaders to step aside. Old ways don’t work against donnie and the clowns.

Expand full comment
Sophia Demas's avatar

I am with you Ruth--what is really breathtaking is that people have bought trump's story. They're still stuck on the "Apprentice" show where he was portrayed as this great businessman. Yet in reality six of his companies have gone bankrupt. Why would any thinking person hire this guy to even manage their restaurant. And here he is running the greatest country on the planet...to the ground....

Expand full comment
Craig Gjerde's avatar

The Apprentice is now available on Amazon Prime.

Expand full comment
Sharon's avatar

Reality TV was a massive contributor to the destruction of our country.

Expand full comment
Dutch Mike's avatar

Yes it was, but on the other hand: there is no such thing as "reality" TV.

Expand full comment
Dave DiDomenico's avatar

Ruth, as much as I dislike Donald Trump, I've always given him credit for one thing: he's the greatest con man ever. Like you I'm astounded by his true believers. I guess it shows us the power of propaganda.

Expand full comment
J L Graham's avatar

We seem inclined to believe what we want to believe, or fear may be true. But isn't that a fool's paradise (and I don't claim that I'm immune to irrational behavior)? Doesn't history and individual experience repeatedly prove that the better we understand reality, or at least our individua and collective understandings that coax the most reliable outcomes from our experience of reality, the more fortunate and resilient we are likely to be?

A sober analysis of the risks to benefits of vaccination is just one of many examples. Reality is the teacher. We are the pupil. Historically, taken as a whole, most accurate maps of reality appear to serve us the best when navigating life. Folly may sometimes win a battle but not the war: the odds are always with "the house". And inadvertent or chosen misunderstanding often ends in sorrow, or worse.

Expand full comment
Ricardo Grinbank's avatar

Correction: about half of American voters are genetically oriented to act stupidly.

Expand full comment
Craig Gjerde's avatar

And they don’t understand consequences—what follows a stupid decision.

Expand full comment
Craig Gjerde's avatar

Say Republicans are nuts.

Expand full comment
Sharon Stearley's avatar

So true! What is wrong with the believers!

Expand full comment
Dutch Mike's avatar

I agree. Greed is just a compensation: it is a way of trying to fill a gigantic hole in their hearts. Donny-boy was never loved by his father, and all this is screaming "Look at me! I'm important! Love me, I'm worth it!"

Expand full comment
Ruth Sheets's avatar

Mike, that is all true, and I have absolutely no sympathy for Trump. Had he put even the smallest effort into it, he could have improved his emotional age, but he prefers to remain at the emotional age of a 3-year-old at best. I love 3-year-olds as they are trying to learn new things, explore their world, etc., but parents do have to say "no" pretty often to keep them safe. A 78-year-old man acting like a 3-year-old has no charm. There are no longer any adults in Trumplandia. He has purged all of them, so he is a free-range toddler, yet getting sympathy from a lot of folks who see that toddler yet can't bring themselves to stop him. Perhaps it is because they too have about the same social-emotional age, by choice.

Expand full comment
Bill Alstrom (MAtoMainetoMA)'s avatar

I can't stop thinking how the press relentlessly focused on Biden's age, his stutter, his less than slick speaking skills. They worried about his mental prowess as he aged.

Biden will be remembered for surrounding himself with real experts and smart advisers. Joe was FAR from perfect. But upon reflection, wasn't it nice to be able to sleep well at night?

And now...that same press doesn't dare ask the obvious questions? Like, why is $Trump allowing Musk to destroy our government? Why has he become a Russian agent? Why does $Trump sound like a lunatic every day? Isn't there something wrong in his brain?

Every day $Trump displays all the characteristics of a mentally ill criminal! Every day he fabricates nonsense. Every day he sounds more and more DEMENTED! He applies tariffs and takes them off then puts them back on again. This is the behavior of an angry child!

And now, he talks of annexing, and if necessary, INVADING Canada! This is beyond nuts! This is crazy shit!

This is when a cabinet would invoke the 25th Amendment. Get the men in white coats now! I know, I know, then we would have Kid Vance. At least he is just evil. Not freaking insane.

Expand full comment
GJ Loft ME CA FL IL NE CT MI's avatar

I've always pictured Trump as a carnival barker, who couldn't hold a real job, but is damn good and selling potions to the wide eyed participants at the fair.

It's hard for me to walk by the barker selling the latest and greatest gizmo who uses words like "Everyone is raving." or "Supplies are limited." We all know exactly what that means but mixed with the other psychologically grabbing words, we can't help but take notice.

Expand full comment
Dutch Mike's avatar

Nailed it, Ruth. Nailed it completely.

Expand full comment
Happy Valley No More's avatar

I don’t disagree with your assessment of the felon;however, I don’t think all the folks who surround him fit that description. They are stupid, driven by greed and power, in the hope of getting their 15 minutes of fame. What they will get is infamy.

Expand full comment
Ally House (Oregon)'s avatar

Excellent analogy, Ruth. Free-range toddler with the nuclear codes.

Expand full comment
CRL's avatar

trump told his biographer:

"When I look at myself in the first grade and I look at myself now, I’m basically the same. The temperament is not that different."

Now that's NOT a lie.

Expand full comment
Carol Stanton (FL)'s avatar

Ruth, " free range toddler"---love that! I also think this must be what it is like to live with an abusive, arrogant bully and an abusive addict!

Donny and Elania together are crazy- making!!

Expand full comment
LisaB's avatar

More like, love me or I'll punch you in the face!

Expand full comment
Penny Scribner's avatar

You're right. You can't make this stuff up. In his first term there he was in the rose garden. He literally jumped (sorta) up and and down, clapped his hands, and said, "I'm President! I'm President!" Yep, you can't make this stuff up.

Expand full comment
Dutch Mike's avatar

"Little Donny-boy was so happy, he was filled with glee. Now that he was the president, he was the big boss. People now had to listen to him. He could tell people to do stuff and they would have to do it because he told them to. Donny-boy was excited: his head was full of ideas of all the things he could let people do - just because he wanted it."

- from The Little Narcissist Adventures

Expand full comment
Ruth Sheets's avatar

Mike, love it! You got the toddleresque nature of Donald Trump just right. Now, since everyone has not done everything he thinks they should do, he is tantruming. The problem now is that Toddler-Trump has dementia and can't remember what he ordered people to do. His playpen managers remind him regularly of the words to say, but there is no guarantee he will get it right. His tantrum against the Ukrainian president was shameful, but he thought it was Zelensky yelling at him. I do not know how we are going to get through this, but somehow, we will if we fight hard enough against the toddler playpen.

Expand full comment
Terry's avatar

Definitely a mental illness like hoarding, related to trauma. But these greedy dick people should be no where near our government. Meant to write sick, but I guess dick works too lol

Expand full comment
Victoria E Graham's avatar

Addiction to greed, and a sidekick addicted to ketamine. I was a professional nurse for 50 years, and it was illegal to present under the influence of substances. And to think of our children having to witness these boogey type people tearing apart our government.... What a horrible scenario: something Disney might create!

Expand full comment
Ricardo Grinbank's avatar

Leigh, what's is less rational of all the irrationality happening hourly, is that millions of voters elected this scumbag president to destroy their own country.

Expand full comment
Dale Rowett's avatar

To be fair, the trumpers didn't think they were electing him to destroy their own country.

They thought he was going to get rid of all the people they hate. They thought he was going to make women obedient. They thought he was going to bring back their jobs. They thought he was going to lower their taxes. They thought he was going to lower the prices of gas and eggs.

Unfortunately, poorly educated conservatives aren't very good at lie detection. And they are profoundly myopic. So they're unable to comprehend that the people they hate make it possible for them to have the things they want at prices they can afford. They are unable to admit that the wealthy who have all that they dream of are never going to share it with them.

Expand full comment
Ruth Sheets's avatar

Dale, very well said! It is astounding to me the way people want to be misled and will pay a lot of money to let it happen to them. I guess if they think they can blame someone else for what happens to them, they see it as low risk, or something. I honestly don't get it, that level of hate and self-delusion.

Expand full comment
J L Graham's avatar

The phrase "Greed is good" was popularized by a villain in a cautionary tale about avarice, but Wall St. and Republicans embraced it as a motto until it was tarnished by the "Great Recession". I was always a weird choice because greed is only greed when someone takes more than they deserve, at the expense of other people. It happens, of course, and those who choose to bully has gone to some trouble to try to make it "normal", even respectable, but it's always been the same old serpent, and it's always been a blight on humanity. And isn't there a part of practically everyone who knows that's true?

And yes it's an addiction, as our billionaires prove every day.

Expand full comment
kdsherpa's avatar

As Dr. Mary Trump titled her book about her horrid uncle, "Too Much and Never Enough".

Expand full comment
Nathan Cohen's avatar

I am a psychiatrist who thinks you are exactlly right.

Expand full comment
Russell John Netto's avatar

One appears to be and that seems to be enough for Trump for the time being given that he's also the richest one of them all. Yesterday, Trump publicly promoted Tesla amidst stories of the company's falling share price and a consumer boycott, with Musk as his side. - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uGdd5JmNrFU

Of course, there's a quid pro quo - Musk is now planning to donate $100m to two Trump-supporting organisations (Make America Great Again Inc., a super PAC, and Securing American Greatness, a political nonprofit) or to a new entity that Trump himself would establish. Musk already funds his own Superpac, America PAC to the tune of over $300m. Trump blasted critics of Musk on Truth Social calling the boycott 'collusive' and 'illegal', which is complete nonsense. The corrupt relationship between the two men (the one a president, the other claimed to be a mere staffer) is quite staggering.

Expand full comment
Craig Gjerde's avatar

Are those tax-deductable, educational groups?

Expand full comment
Russell John Netto's avatar

Make America Great Again is just a Super PAC so it has to file donations with the FEC. I thought it had been terminated when the Save America PAC was formed. Securing American Greatness is a 501(c)(4) supposedly promoting social welfare within a community. There's some doubt about its bona fides - https://www.politico.com/news/2024/05/31/trump-dark-money-group-00161122

Expand full comment
Marla's avatar

It’s a cycle of market manipulation. Tariffs are coming: market tanks. Stock prices drop, vulture capitalists buy. Never mind, tariffs delayed: market goes up. Stock prices rise, vulture capitalists sell. Lather rinse repeat. This (along with short selling) is what caused the Great Depression.

The fat cats get grotesquely richer, while those of us who have invested, via 401Ks, are watching our savings melt away. If Social Security is defunded, then what happens to us?

Never mind, they don’t care.

Aux barricades!

Expand full comment
Dutch Mike's avatar

Exactly this.

Expand full comment
lin•'s avatar

There has been a significant increase in I think what is called 'shorting' or 'hedging' where the super wealthy 'bet' on a 'Trump market' of major companies stock falling. . I think only the super wealthy can buy into these funds because of the minimum investment required. A very wealthy person once explained this sort of investing and I probably did not pay much attention (pennies in jars here;) Perhaps someone can correct or expand on this.

Expand full comment
Dutch Mike's avatar

As far as I know, that's correct. That is the way the super-rich get even richer when the economy crashes; plus, they can buy companies threatening to go bankrupt at record-low prices. That is why Musk, very consciously and with determination, wants to crash the economy: it will make him even richer.

Expand full comment
lin•'s avatar

ThankYou. Yes, I forgot that other part.

So many arguments for a truly progressive system of taxation

Expand full comment
Dutch Mike's avatar

Zelda-style taxes, I say.

Expand full comment
Kathy Clark's avatar

And how the Russian oligarchs bought Russia.

Expand full comment
Dutch Mike's avatar

Worked in Russia; rinse and repeat in America.

Expand full comment
D.Allen's avatar

Yep, small investors sell at a loss. Then wealthy folks buy up the cheap stock and when the market recovers, they are even richer! A billionaire’s game since they can afford to play the market.

Expand full comment
Dutch Mike's avatar

Some things never do change, do they... :/

Expand full comment
Dennis Hui's avatar

The standard 'short' is that you 'borrow' a stock from an investment dealer, sell it and then buy it back and cover the position when the stock price drops. You basically then realize the difference in value betwen when you sell the borrowed stock and when you buy it back

There are other fairly easy things one can do, for example, buying put options on stock indices. These things gain value when the indices drop below theie contract 'strike price'. So one can easily imagine a nafarious party holding a bunch of these contracts and then wait for the bad news to jolt the market and then exercise to realize the 'profit'.

Expand full comment
Linda Mitchell, KCMO's avatar

As I posted yesterday, short selling is not allowed for retirement funds and index funds but rich people--and members of Congress--do it all the time.

Expand full comment
Sophia Demas's avatar

The mega-rich will always find measures to preserve their wealth, but that doesn't mean that we of lesser means can't be proactive to protect what we have. I trust my gut. In 2007 when I kept getting kicked in the stomach, we sold most of our stocks and placed our money in a money market fund, and invested $10,200 in physical gold that is now worth $170k. Wouldn't you know it that the economy crashed in 2008 when we bought back stock at bargain basement prices. trump's shenanigans have once more given me a gut-punch. Just sold all our stocks last Friday (except silver and gold related stock) and put proceeds in a 4.5% interest yielding money market so that we can sleep at night. I am writing about this only to urge you to act for what you feel is best for you....

Expand full comment
Rickey Woody's avatar

although the losses will have little effect on their lifestyles, their totals is how they keep score among themselves.

Expand full comment
Dutch Mike's avatar

Translation: "my penis is longer than yours."

Expand full comment
Richard Sutherland's avatar

Tesla stock, on 12-27-2024 reached a high of $450. Today it is $230.58 per share, a decrease of $219.42 per share. Tesla has 3,198,000,000 outstanding shares, Musk owns 12.8 percent of Tesla stock, or 409,344,000 shares. His Tesla stock has lost $219.42 per share. That's more than the GNP of some countries. That's a decrease of about $90 billion.

Expand full comment
celeste k.'s avatar

no.

Expand full comment
Russell John Netto's avatar

Surely you mean - No-oooooo!!!

Expand full comment
CRL's avatar

trump told his biographer:

"When I look at myself in the first grade and I look at myself now, I’m basically the same. The temperament is not that different."

Now that's NOT a lie.

Expand full comment
Barb Orze's avatar

I, myself, planned well for retirement. I have quite enough to live on and my little stockpile of money has become just numbers on a page. While it is nice to see them get bigger, it doesn't affect my daily life, and my guess is, most billionaires hardly notice their losses.

Expand full comment
Fred WI's avatar

Way the market is going, the top 10% are going to require a cash influx which only a bigley tax cut can provide.

Expand full comment
Sharon's avatar

This will be when Trump bails them out with our tax dollars.

Expand full comment
Garrett Mengel's avatar

It's the oligarch's credo - "Privatize the profits and socialize the losses"

Expand full comment
George Baum's avatar

Gary, they don't pay taxes and already own more than they would ever want.

Expand full comment
Nancy Fitzgerald's avatar

I am uncomfortable with calling T ‘insane’ he thrives on chaos. People who have mental illness do not deserve the bad press. And I do not believe in reality. It is just a social construct, on a sliding scale.

T has found not only comfort in chaos, he has found two opportunities 1- to be a con man and 2- to feel comfortable and in control. He makes money when things are out of control, and he can keep things spinning and confusing. The tariffs are an example of this. Lots of attention lots of chaos driven by him and who knows what’s going on behind the curtain.

We crave predictably and so are more easily confused. He is predictable, just look for the chaos, and meanness. He’ll be there. If it hurts someone for no reason it’s to the good, if it hurts his enemy as well he loves it.

M is just a gamer, who wants to die with the most toys, only believes he won’t die. Destroying the rest of the world and taking over, he can just start a new game here or on Mars. If you don’t care about anything but winning anything is permissible and no one matters.

For most of us with compassion and care about each other and the world we have a hard time comprehending their world view. So we are often confused and surprised. It makes no sense to us. Two different ‘realities’.

That is why community is so important. To reinforce our reality and feeling of stability, our reality. Human face to face interaction is reassuring. And together we get hope and action and change. It is/will be hard, yet we must persist, together.

It might be best to coalesce around someone like Bernie or AOC. It is easier to follow one leader who is out there talking forcefully. Following a person who is getting press is easier than a movement. Common Cause is great, but hard to be passionate about it.

Expand full comment
Patricia  A  Martinez's avatar

Hell no , greedy white men aren't patient. Not when it comes to losing money.

Expand full comment
John C. Rains's avatar

Gary, You think they're short the market? I'll bet!

Expand full comment
Janice Bell's avatar

I think he wants to drain the wealth from the stock market leaving citizens 401k drained. Put it all in his meme coin and make us all use meme coin. He once said he wanted American money to be crypto.

Expand full comment
J L Graham's avatar

International boycotts of US products has got to hurt.

Expand full comment
Ruth Sheets's avatar

J L, it's those "visions of tax cuts" that are leading them astray. Already corporations, particularly very large ones, you know billionaire-class ones already get out of paying a significant portion of the taxes they owe by renaming things so they fit through the many loopholes in the tax code. I can't help but think that if they want that much in tax-cutting, it is likely their businesses are not worthy of the support we give them. Their only purpose is to make a bunch of already-too-rich white boys even richer. Why is anyone, even members of Congress supporting that?

Expand full comment
Happy Valley No More's avatar

All the republicans in congress are traitors to the people, the country, and the constitution. They have bent the knee to their felonious leader. Little Mikey Johnson is the worst of the sycophants.

Expand full comment
Bill Alstrom (MAtoMainetoMA)'s avatar

All those Republicons should have marched over to the White House and demanded $Trump's resignation (as with Nixon) when the "child in a man suit" mentioned invading Canada. THAT should be a bridge too far for anyone who is a patriot and is still sane. I mean, really? WTF?

Expand full comment
Sarah Bern's avatar

That’s the shirt I want,

“WTF, America!”

And Canada really is the bridge too far, farcical to even think about in normal times, but he seems to be obsessed with it and nothing is normal right now.

Expand full comment
JohnM upstateNY's avatar

Ruth, one suspects that most members of congress, especially MAGATs and most other Republicans, want very much to join that club of rich white guys. If you’ve ever seen listings of the net worth of Republicans in congress vs Democrats and Independents you will see a distinct difference. That is why they fight measures which would limit or eliminate their ability to buy or sell stock while serving in congress.

Expand full comment
J L Graham's avatar

Never mind the politicians billionaires tend to support and enrich.

Expand full comment
D.Allen's avatar

Ruth,

Cause they are chicken shits.

Expand full comment
JennSH from NC's avatar

Because those already too rich white boys put money in their politicians’ pockets.

Expand full comment
Sharon Stearley's avatar

For the old folks like me they are excited about their Social Security not being taxed as he promises....I am worried about just getting my Social Security check each month on time.

Expand full comment
J L Graham's avatar

Or getting it at all. Trump won't care.

Expand full comment
Marian Goldsmith's avatar

That expression would make a terrific political cartoon in the old style. Or maybe Mad Magazine’s? Oops. Unintended pun ;-)

Expand full comment
Patricia Davis's avatar

This is my concern . I am asking what we ( me in mine) in local communities plan to do. In this rural red state (WV) 1 in 3 depends on SS/Medicare/Medicaid. The statistics are dismal already. We have 94 Republicans and 6 Democrats in our state electeds.

John Barry Larson, (D) Conn. gave a wonderful synapse and speech recently about everyone’s situation and chastised his constituents .

J L you are absolutely /nail on the head /to.the.point.

I am asking locals ..‘what’s your plan B? ‘ Talking to my local Farmers Markets, calling my reps. The Trump flags are still flying here. ‘Oh it’ll be fine soon’ is what I hear except for the solid Dems and they’re ripped!

I am prepared.

But it won’t be easy. I’m long past a spring chicken. But I care about my neighbors, my community,my state and my country. Many of them are Republicans, some have converted …even recently.

They are NOT prepared.

I am working to inform/advise …and doing ( as Ruth Ben Ghait amusingly stated) A LOT OF YOGA.👩‍🌾🧘‍♂️

Expand full comment
Sandra Simpson's avatar

It is not too late to write something positive about Biden. I think positive about Biden will help us transition to democratic leadership if we could find a democrat to step up.

Expand full comment
Heroes Come In All Sizes's avatar

I think Canada should call his bluff and ask to become part of the USA. Canada has 13 provinces, so they should be formed into 13 states. That's 26 additional Democratic senators and 40 additional Democratic members of the House.

Canadians are smart, sane, polite people. Let's let our 51st, 52nd, 53rd, 54th, 55th, 56th, 57th, 58th, 59th, 60th, 61st, 62nd, and 63rd new states help us impeach the felon/russian PINO and take our country back.

Expand full comment
Lanette's avatar

How about Canada annexes some of the blue states? I’m in MN, just south of that artificial border. Take me!

Expand full comment
Karen Z's avatar

I’m in NY and would rather a number of US states join Canada. 🇨🇦

Expand full comment
J L Graham's avatar

My daughter married a Canadian, in Canada.

Expand full comment
John Gregory's avatar

the usual map shown in Canada in the past few years shows Canada absorbing the west coast states, MN, New England and maybe New York. The rest is called Jesusland, and Canada wants no part of it.

Expand full comment
Terry's avatar

Except they do not really believe in what Jesus taught, it's all lies, everything the repubs say and do is lies...

Expand full comment
J L Graham's avatar

Persecute the poor and abused. Worship the richest. Machine gun your enemies. Wasn't that all part of The Sermon on the Mount?

Expand full comment
Ally House (Oregon)'s avatar

I'd like to see Pacifica as a Canadian province. Washington, Oregon, California, and Hawaii. The eastern halves of WA/OR can join Greater Idaho; eastern CA can join Arizona.

Expand full comment
Mary Ellen Harris's avatar

I love the name Cascadia: BC, Washington, Oregon, California.

We are domiciled in Wasco County, please don't send us off to Idaho! Idaho is trying to kill young women.

Expand full comment
Cindy Gailey's avatar

My sister would have to move West WA so as not to be lumped with Idaho!

Expand full comment
Kathy Clark's avatar

What about Alaska?

Expand full comment
The BobCaster's avatar

It would make sense for Canada to annex Alaska.

I mean what does THAT artificial line mean, anyway?

Expand full comment
Margaret MacKenzie's avatar

Alaska will be Russian again.

Expand full comment
Mary Ellen Harris's avatar

Alaska actually is a good fit when the oil runs out. The Texas and Oklahoma people/companies are already moving out.

Expand full comment
Ally House (Oregon)'s avatar

It's own Province, or state.

Expand full comment
Beth B's avatar

LA County here...... They already invited CA, OR, WA - the Cascadia 🤗

Expand full comment
Ally House (Oregon)'s avatar

Let's let Hawaii in as well!!!

Expand full comment
Sharon's avatar

Hawaii should be given their independence. We lived there for 3 years. What the United States government did to them is horrific. It’s no wonder they hate us. They forbid them to practice their own culture unless it was to entertain the tourists in the rich white mans resorts.

Expand full comment
Alfhard's avatar

Annexing can cut both ways. Have a look at what Canadian Green Party leader Elizabeth May had to say about Trump's desire to annex Canada:

https://ca.video.search.yahoo.com/search/video?fr=mcafee&p=elizabeth+may+speech&type=E211CA1056G0#id=8&vid=72eb7979291077c6d00159819d72c33e&action=click

Expand full comment
Kristie Jacobs's avatar

Take Michigan, too! My state❤️

Expand full comment
Geraldine's avatar

At least the U.P.!

Expand full comment
Karen Rile's avatar

I know these ideas are just castles in the clouds, but those of us who do not live in blue states feel quite awful when this idea gets spitballed.

Expand full comment
Joan Lederman's avatar

Finally, an idea that makes good sense, thank you. I might repeat your idea when I call my representatives -- would you like to be credited?

Expand full comment
Heather Clark's avatar

I am one of the Canadians who is furious with Donold! Why would we give up our universal healthcare to be part of the mess that is currently the U.S.?

Expand full comment
The BobCaster's avatar

There is no reason why you should.

I live just across the water from VI, maybe 30 miles as the crow flies.

I listen to CBC everyday.

What I can say is that Canada has declared war on Trump.

Expand full comment
J L Graham's avatar

After Trump declared war on Canada.

Expand full comment
The BobCaster's avatar

Right you are!

Expand full comment
Alfhard's avatar

Or the other way around by American blue states joining Canada.

Have a look at what Canadian Green Party leader Elizabeth May had to say:

https://ca.video.search.yahoo.com/search/video?fr=mcafee&p=elizabeth+may+speech&type=E211CA1056G0#id=8&vid=72eb7979291077c6d00159819d72c33e&action=click

Expand full comment
Bill Pierce's avatar

I don’t think after the annexation, or actually prior to it, either house of Congress will be more than window dressing. I seriously doubt there will be “elections”.

Expand full comment
Virginia Witmer's avatar

Humor and truth. Thanks to all of you. 🤣🤣👏🏻

Expand full comment
Reese Johnson's avatar

Canada does have its own far-right.

Expand full comment
Cindy Gailey's avatar

Iguess those folks can move to a Red state...

Expand full comment
J L Graham's avatar

Yes, though somewhat more polite than our Third Reich wannabees so far as I can tell. They seem to pop up in every society.

Expand full comment
Alan Peterson's avatar

Good thinking! I love your idea.

Expand full comment
J L Graham's avatar

I expect that Trump would treat Canada the way he treats Puerto Rico, were that boundary ever removed. Paper towels but no standing. I think Canadians know that.

Expand full comment
J L Graham's avatar

Interesting how the Doublethink Dude thinks that the Canadian border is illusory, yet the Mexican border needs the Great Wall of Trump.

Expand full comment
Susan Ross's avatar

The best idea I have heard yet put that way I feel sure the prospect to prospect all your rich resources will look substantially less appealing

I love Canada and Canadians❤️‼️

Expand full comment
Barb Orze's avatar

I don't know that Alberta, in particular, would be D.

Expand full comment
J L Graham's avatar

Oil.

Expand full comment
Reese Johnson's avatar

Ha ha, that was a good laugh!

Expand full comment
Jennifer Rogers's avatar

That's what I kiddingly remarked to Canadians I met while on vacation in Mexico! They were uniformly horrified to project being added on to the USA.

Expand full comment
Linda MacDonald's avatar

I watch mainstream media and am informed that Trump inherited a great economy from the Biden administration. It’s there but if you don’t watch or read it then you can’t see it.

Expand full comment
MLMinET's avatar

A long-time friend, formerly a reasonable and even-tempered woman, became Fox-fied I believe. We don’t talk often, but over the last cpl years she complained about what a catastrophe Biden was—she couldn’t afford for him to be pres, etc. I’ll hear from her on my birthday in June, wonder what she’ll think by then. It breaks my heart what has happened to her. And millions more.

Expand full comment
J L Graham's avatar

It's weird. A distant relation I was fond of went full bore Trumpista, and pretty much cut herself off from old friends. MAGAification can present like a psychotic break.

Expand full comment
Nirlep Patel's avatar

Very aggravating. On Fox and its metastases, the economy was in shambles in January which is complete BS. But that’s what a large segment of the population is being led to believe.

Expand full comment
Leigh Horne's avatar

I would hope that next time around, if there is a next time around, we might elect a person who had spent more time in town halls than on the floor of the Senate.

Expand full comment
Pam Taylor's avatar

Leigh, or that Republican Congress members would confirm experts to cabinet positions, instead of people like Linda McMahon, who said she wasn't sure what IDEA stood for, and went on to reassure us that, "This is my fifth day on the job and I'm really trying to learn them very quickly." Really?? We couldn't have, maybe, someone who has experience in the education field and has already learned what they need to know? Being a retired teacher, it makes my blood boil to see someone who cares nothing about the education of ordinary children think they can tear down the Dept of Education and cater to the children of the rich and privileged. We are being bombarded with facts about "The Lifestlyes of the Rich and Famous." People who thought that Trump would work for ordinary citizens were misguided and flat-out wrong.

Expand full comment
Virginia Witmer's avatar

How could ANYONE have been fooled by Trump? People weren’t looking at him. The price of eggs win is preposterous beyond measure. He has nothing in his head except 1) staying out of jail and 2) having more and more money. It’s gotta be gold like his toilets!

Expand full comment
Mary Greenwald's avatar

It certainly cannot be Mark Kelly! He likes to claim he is enraged, but he votes Trump. Both Kelly and Gallego (AZ) voted often to approve Trump's nominees. They show their true colors when they can vote in private. When voting AYE for a very flawed nominee who will win even if you vote NO, does not show courage or leadership. Democrats deserve better.

Expand full comment
Kathy Clark's avatar

Yep. Kelly and Gallego did. I was astounded and sent him a message saying how disappointed I was that he voted to confirm them. I am watching his other votes but his defense of Ukraine was was important.

Expand full comment
Patricia  A  Martinez's avatar

Senators aren't perfect. Senator Kelly went to Ukraine and saw the suffering of the Ukrainian people. He put Musk in his place. You can't argue with intelligence. Bravo 👏 for Senator Kelly a who has served his country.

Expand full comment
Jennifer Rogers's avatar

I agree. I want to, but can't trust Kelly.

Expand full comment
Rex Farley's avatar

Thanks Sandra, I think the thing about where we are at right now that makes me so angry is thinking about where we would be if 10 million Democrats had bothered to vote!! We can't make that mistake again, if we get a chance, that is.

Expand full comment
Judith Smith 1111's avatar

Sandra Simpson -- President Biden has recently slid severely in my estimation. I don't think I will **ever** forgive him for not stepping aside BEFORE the Democratic Convention, and hadn't endorsed / recommended we swing our support to the unqualified (IMO) VP Kamala Harris. I cannot think of anything positive to write about Biden as President. Sad !

Expand full comment
Kathy Clark's avatar

He decreased the cost of insulin. Just sayin'.

Expand full comment
JaKsaa's avatar

Right on Dutch Mike, your last line about our insubordinate press media hides the transparency to inform the American people on what’s happening in our political news.

HCR said tonight ‘Unable to admit that he might be wrong, President Donald Trump is doubling down on the policies that are crashing the economy.’

Why are we not demanding that our MSM never brought forward the Trump campaign supporting the FBI and White Supremacist militants targeting their extreme aggressions against our safe Democracy.

Link to Tavis Smiley interviewing Mike German:

Listen on Apple Podcasts: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/tavis-smiley/id1609823559?i=1000691032772

Expand full comment
Dutch Mike's avatar

Exactly! Americans should be really loud about this!

Expand full comment
Rex Page (Left Coast)'s avatar

77 million willfully ignorant American voters think it’s a plus.

Expand full comment
Ellie Kona's avatar

Except ambulance chaser profiteers welcome the exploitation opportunities of a recession.

Expand full comment
Dutch Mike's avatar

Yes, yes, that is the plan: crash the economy, and buy the leftovers at a bargain price. Musk has promised to this from the beginning ("it's all for your best interest"); it's like a discount sale for billionaires.

Expand full comment
MLMinET's avatar

It’s what Putin did, privatizing Russian companies, making himself perhaps the world’s richest man.

Expand full comment
Dutch Mike's avatar

Rinse and repeat in America.

Expand full comment
JDinTX's avatar

They have thought of all the ways to screw the public, including the MAGAts

Expand full comment
Nancy Vernon's avatar

"A dying business throws off cash." Investment stops - money is available ; employees are fired - payroll dollars are available; overhead costs stop - dollars are available. All those funds are floating around, to be hoovered up by Musk's adolescents.

Expand full comment
Leigh Horne's avatar

Is the reporting really like an ambulance chaser's attempt to gain an advantage, or is in more like an attempt to avoid stimulating mass panic in the face of the burning building we appear to be in?

Expand full comment
Bill Pierce's avatar

Reporters can be very good. And like many people in risky professions, they often go extra miles. But all news gathering has lost all independence and come under the thumb of the very large corporations that own them. It was a dramatic shift in the 1960’s that stripped newsrooms and reporters of the means to gather, deliver, and distribute news. That began a very long time ago. And this is where we are today. Television is a very popular but poor source of information for some 50 or 60 years. Radio, less than that but nothing expensive to produce is immune. All said, pay attention, it can be better than nothing. Be careful and choosey. Listen to everyone and most importantly, don’t “believe”, make up your own mind. As I’m sure you always have after visiting the iffy restaurant.

Expand full comment
J L Graham's avatar

"The Shock Doctrine"

Expand full comment
Ruth Sheets's avatar

Mike, I doubt the media will ever admit it was wrong and that it deliberately weighted the election coverage toward Trump in 3 elections and while he was in office. They want eyes or ears and don't care about the outcome. I have little sympathy for the many media platforms that sacrificed their objectivity and honor for a total jerk who has no sense of a greater good beyond himself and the money and power he can accumulate. The smart media guys and gals knew what Trump was and is, yet did it to us anyway. That is beyond shameful!

Expand full comment
Cindy Gailey's avatar

All done for market share & $.

Expand full comment
Dutch Mike's avatar

Totally agree with you there, Ruth.

Expand full comment
Meant for the Mountains's avatar

This is an engineered collapse. Setting Trump aside, these are not stupid people; they understand how mass firings, hollowing out government, and indiscriminate tariffs against our allies would damage the economy and market. But they can hoover up assets and resources at bargain prices while we suffer. Think of the farms, homes, businesses, public lands and now national park land that are likely to be sold off in a depressed market, allowing them to increase their wealth and power. And bonus - tariffs on allies harm their economies and destabilize their governments at a time when both the US and Russia are threatening to invade. The billionaires are executing a long-term plan, and we are collateral damage.

Expand full comment
Dutch Mike's avatar

Yep. This is the essence: tank the economy, buy everything at discount prices. Musk promised to do this beforehand, and everyone went along with it.

Expand full comment
Karen Rile's avatar

Exactly! He said very directly what he was going to do, and that we would feel pain. And people still voted for this, wtf.

Expand full comment
Dutch Mike's avatar

...and are still cheering on Mad King Trump and Evil Emperor Musk. I simply can't believe how stupid people can be. A few, yes, but so many millions?? I still can't believe it.

Expand full comment
Bill Pierce's avatar

It’ll be “Privatized” by a shell of a shell, etc. Going to a deceased person closely related to and willed to … you guess. But I oversimplify.

Expand full comment
Bill Pierce's avatar

I agree completely. This is exactly what occurred during the last “Great Depression”. Though it can be a tricky business. At the end of the US Civil War, many had amassed reserves in Confederate currency. Not a happy choice for reinvestment either then or ever.

Expand full comment
MLMinET's avatar

“Concerned” CEOs need to Quit talking to tfg—talk to the repubs protecting him and threaten THEIR seats.

Expand full comment
Dutch Mike's avatar

Talking to TFFG makes no sense anyway. He only listens when you're flattering him, otherwise he zones out.

Expand full comment
Harvey Kravetz's avatar

Trump, "Biden the worst president ever handing over a horrible economy". The truth in it opposite, as usual.

Expand full comment
Dutch Mike's avatar

Directly from Adolf Hitler's playbook: "His primary rules were: never allow the public to cool off; never admit a fault or wrong; never concede that there may be some good in your enemy; never leave room for alternatives; never accept blame; concentrate on one enemy at a time and blame him for everything that goes wrong; people will believe a big lie sooner than a little one; and if you repeat it frequently enough people will sooner or later believe it."

Expand full comment
Terry's avatar

the only things the felon rapist can do is destroy and steal...

Expand full comment
Ann M.'s avatar

…or written truthfully about trump. Sanewashing was off the charts.

Expand full comment
Stephanie Banks's avatar

I couldn't finish Heather's post today. I am so outraged and disspirited. The obfuscations, hypocrisy, savagery and hate are overwhelming. Trump and his followers root against good news celebrating the demise of innocent people and institutions. Please read the New York Times article today - three opinion writer assess the damage of Trump's first 50 days.

Expand full comment
Ally House (Oregon)'s avatar

I hear you, Stephanie. So horrifying to see where we are in just a short period of time. What chills me to the bone is how many of the MAGAt side in my former work cohort are eating it like candy.

Expand full comment
Hiro's avatar

Thomas Friedman wrote in NYT rather a pessimistic prospect of America. He cited Lincoln’s speech that a country that thrives on liberty can perish only by suicide. America appears in that stage. We need to stop this self destruction powered by Trump / Musk. We must work to save life of this country. We need a new hero in DEMs. Any name?

Expand full comment
Bill Fritz's avatar

Chaos is always going to be the headline. Donald Trump writes their headlines for them everyday day; even when he wasn’t in office. Joe Biden quietly went about the business of securing and building our country. No excitement for the media to cover, and they could not stand the possibility of four more years of steady, stately leadership. The media is getting exactly what they wanted.

Expand full comment
Dutch Mike's avatar

So it is. They'll be getting enough mayhem, carnage and bloodshed to cover... Reporting on normal, reasonable leadership is boring, of course.

Expand full comment
Mobiguy's avatar

The true billionaires knew what was coming and shorted the stock market. They're doing just fine, thank you.

Expand full comment
Bill Pierce's avatar

Funny, but not really, how folks imagine that reality is kind of like checkers or chess. While a move of the moment is proposed or made, other things, indeed all else, remain fixed. Although nothing in life works this way, a remarkable amount of reasoning seems to remain stuck in gear. Likely it’s one of the laws of extinction.

Sometime, I should mention my notion of the La Brea tar pits and the common sense expression “one learns from one’s mistakes “.

Expand full comment
Dutch Mike's avatar

You've expressed it wonderfully, Bill. That is the kind of reductionist-materialist-mechanical thinking that the "modern" West has been stuck in since the days of Descartes. Always thinking in 'separation' and 'other'. Reality as a series of fixed snapshots instead of a process, as Heraclites and William James described it. And yes, the quantum physicist David Bohm did say: "This fragmented thinking may well lead to our extinction." Well, here we are.

Expand full comment
Valerie Bourdot's avatar

Badenomics

Expand full comment
Maureen Farrell Kolbe's avatar

2 Words - Hatch Act. As a former federal employee, if I had violated the Hatch Act, as Donnie is doing with Tesla, I would have lost my job and been prosecuted. How does this not apply to hi ?

Expand full comment
Dutch Mike's avatar

The law doesn’t apply to him anymore: the Extreme Court made him immune, remember?

Expand full comment
Bill Corbett's avatar

"Extreme Court", that's a perfect description.

Expand full comment
Dee of the Terrace's avatar

So he can be a traitor and pass by any laws? That says a lot!

Expand full comment
Cindy Gailey's avatar

Pretty clear explanations of rules. Thanks.

Expand full comment
J L Graham's avatar

$COTUS says that Trump is above the law. As are they.

Expand full comment
MaryPat's avatar

$COTU$.

Expand full comment
Anne-Louise Luccarini's avatar

Can you name anything that does apply to him? He's never had a job to lose, anyway: losing is for losers, and a con man isn't a loser until he runs out of bribes to lawyers.

Expand full comment
Russell John Netto's avatar

The only instance in which the Hatch Act applies directly to the president – thanks to a 1993 amendment to the Act – is if the president uses his position to intimidate, threaten, or coerce a federal employee. It's presently unclear whether the SCOTUS ruling on presidential immunity would affect this provision (it's arguable that it can be no part of a president's official duties to behave like this towards an employee). Richard Painter, former chief White House ethics lawyer, told the Washington Post:“He may not be violating the Hatch Act, but he is ordering other people to. At a certain point you are using White House resources, and that is a violation of the Hatch Act.” You may recall that Hampton Dellinger, the Special Counsel of the US who runs the Office of the Special Counsel, was recently fired by Trump. This office is responsible (and indeed was set up) to investigate violations of the Hatch Act. No surprise why he was fired - in July 2020, the Office of the Special Counsel found 13 Trump officials in violation of the Hatch Act.

Expand full comment
JennSH from NC's avatar

Thirteen Trump officials in violation of the Hatch Act. Is that all?

Expand full comment
Russell John Netto's avatar

They were never able to nail Kellyanne Conway, who was responsible for numerous violations. At around the same time, Ivanka Trump, then a White House employee, posted a photograph online celebrating Goya Foods, whose chief executive had recently praised her father, in what government ethics experts called a clear violation of federal law. The president followed up the next day with his own photograph, featuring the company’s products arrayed on the Resolute Desk in the Oval Office (and he's very particular about that desk - after Musk's four-year-old son wiped the contents of his nose on the desk during their recent joint interview, Trump had it sent out to be cleaned).

Expand full comment
Linda Claudine's avatar

There are two exemptions in the Hatch Act:

(i) an employee paid from an appropriation for the Executive Office of the President; or

(ii) an employee appointed by the President, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, whose position is located within the United States, who determines policies to be pursued by the United States in the nationwide administration of Federal laws.

Expand full comment
Maureen Farrell Kolbe's avatar

So that means Donnie can promote the sale of Teslas on the front lawn of the White House?

Expand full comment
Kathy Hughes's avatar

Trump appointed Musk without the advice and consent of the senate.

Expand full comment
Daniel Solomon's avatar

Nothin' up his sleeve!

Expand full comment
JDinTX's avatar

He wouldn’t care, neither would the SC

Expand full comment
Happy Valley No More's avatar

However I don’t think the billionaire was ever approved by anyone or his little crime ridden dog office.

Expand full comment
Virginia Witmer's avatar

His approval comes from Putin! How could anyone doubt that the hierarchy is Putin/Musk/DT/Vance?

Expand full comment
Linda Heath's avatar

He also threatens those who demonstrate against Tesla; "And then the same man who gave a blanket pardon to those convicted of violent crimes related to the January 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol called those protesting at Tesla dealerships “domestic terrorists” and promised that the government would make sure they “go through hell.” (HCR)

Expand full comment
Mary Greenwald's avatar

I am already going through hell. Every day. Since November 5, 2024!

Expand full comment
Bill Pierce's avatar

Nearly everyone in this and the prior Drumpf administration has with routine impunity disregarded the Hatch Act.

Expand full comment
becky estill's avatar

Per @kenwhite.bsky.social‬:

"Members of a government that believes it is not bound by the rule of law are not entitled to its protection.”

Expand full comment
Karen Turley's avatar

Nothing that applies to others EVER applies to right-wingers. Hypocrisy doesn't matter, shame has no effect, flouting laws is meaningless. If any of it did, we wouldn't be here. It's beyond disgusting.

Expand full comment
Happy Valley No More's avatar

He has been given immunity for all crimes committed in the service of being president. Thank you to the extreme high court!

Expand full comment
Gjay15's avatar

How many of us have been written up or fired for doing the right and responsible thing? Think whistleblowers

Expand full comment
Mitchell Pressman's avatar

That would be a good question for the US Supreme Court.

Expand full comment
Phil Balla's avatar

All the late night comics zeroed in on the fat orange felon’s commercial for Tesla.

Of course his favorite Nazi, Elon Musk, was there.

Most of the comics also noted how this commercial set at the White House violated federal law, as that’s ours – public property, and can never be used for any commercial purposes.

But then again, this duo’s larger announcement was their reiteration of their total contempt for all American law. Or, we could say, too, their disregard for all the murder, assault on neighboring countries, theft, rape, kidnapping, and wanton destruction by their pal Putin.

Good for the comics, counterpart to Republicans in Congress and on the Clarence court sycophant to the lawlessness, treasonous now supporting Putin’s vaster criminality.

Expand full comment
GJ Loft ME CA FL IL NE CT MI's avatar

Every so often Roberts decides to uphold the US Constitution. The other day the Court voted 5-4 against Trump being able to withhold funds that were not only allocated but approved for payment.

The two known sexual predators on the court (Alito and Kavanaugh) plus Gorsuch and Thomas voted that the President holds the purse strings of the Federal Government a clear violation of Article 1.

If Robert's had voted the other way, the Court is saying that the US Treasury is Trump's (and Musk's) to do with as they please. This would have been as bad a decision as Dobb's and Trump being above the law.

Expand full comment
Elizabeth Walters's avatar

Was not aware Alito was a sexual predator. Perhaps he is. But don't leave out Clarence Thomas.

Expand full comment
MLMinET's avatar

He must have meant Thomas.

Expand full comment
Elizabeth Walters's avatar

He probably did. And Thomas had to be listed here. If Gary edits his comment, I'll happily delete mine.

Expand full comment
GJ Loft ME CA FL IL NE CT MI's avatar

Sorry for the ambiguity. Thomas and Kavanaugh. I'd hate to falsely malign a white Christian nationalist's sexual deviancy. /S

Expand full comment
KMD's avatar

As far as sexual predators are concerned,- don't you mean Thomas & Kavanaugh?

Haven't heard that said about Alito - yet.

Expand full comment
Robot Bender's avatar

At Alito's age, all the victims are probably long dead.

Expand full comment
Russell John Netto's avatar

The court ruled that since a deadline given by a lower court had already passed, they should "clarify what obligations the government must fulfil to ensure compliance with the temporary restraining order." So it ain't over yet since Trump can still appeal that lower court clarification of its TRO. Even that cautious ruling has led to problems for Amy Coney Barrett, who has been denounced by the far right for siding with the majority - https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/mar/08/amy-coney-barrett-under-attack-by-right-wing

Expand full comment
Happy Valley No More's avatar

Maybe someone should do a gender check under her robes because OBVIOUSLY she’s got a pair! Unlike her cohorts…

Expand full comment
Ally House (Oregon)'s avatar

HV, we just carry them on the insides. That external carry is a weakness.

Expand full comment
Russell John Netto's avatar

It might seem like that but the Guardian article says that she votes with Alito and Thomas 80% of the time. Let's wait and see how she votes when the inevitable appeal reaches the court.

Expand full comment
Sandra Simpson's avatar

Thank you this is very important insight. I had no idea that the Supreme Court had ruled on this interesting to know who voted for it against

Expand full comment
Bryan Sean McKown's avatar

The SCOTUS 5-4 Opinion was unsigned but, AMY CONEY BARRETT & Chief Judge Roberts voted with Kagan, Sotomayor & K B Jackson releasing $2 Billion in already authorized expenditures by Congress not the orange autocrat.

I recommend anything by SCOTUSblog Co-founder, AMY HOWE, particularly on Opinion days.⚖️

Justice Amy Coney Barrett is a new MAGA Target.

Expand full comment
Anne-Louise Luccarini's avatar

That prospect was far from her mind when she stood beside Trump in the Rose Garden, smiling happily, on the eve of his eviction.

Expand full comment
Myra Marx Ferree's avatar

Comics are doing what Dem Party should be and isn’t. Standing up in real time to make clear what wrongs are being done to all of us. Grateful for their outreach!

Expand full comment
Bill Pierce's avatar

I wonder what the Supremes are gonna do about it when their decision is functionally ignored?

Expand full comment
Phil Balla's avatar

"Every so often," as you say, Gary.

Trouble is, history will keep the facts of Roberts in 2010 voting 1) to steroid corruption by the rich in Citizens United, 2) his joining the fascist line that women and their private, family decisions do not belong to them, 3 his further tilt to monarchy in declaring the fat orange guy immune to American law, and 4) his contempt for the Constitution in just flat-out ignoring the clear language of Article 14, Section Three.

Expand full comment
Dutch Mike's avatar

I’m waiting for Trump to install a law that makes it mandatory for every American citizen to buy at least one Tesla car.

Expand full comment
Kathy's avatar

WASHINGTON (The Borowitz Report)—In an emergency address from the Oval Office on Monday afternoon, Donald J. Trump commanded the American people not to check their 401k accounts.

“Anyone caught checking their 409s (sic) can and will be deported,” he warned.

Asserting that he was issuing this order “for your own good,” Trump added, "Elon says there's a virus in the stock market and if you check your stocks it will spread to your body."

Though he claimed that “nothing bad is happening on Wall Street,” he promised the American people that, in the event of a stock market crash, “I will fix it with my Sharpie.”

https://www.borowitzreport.com/p/trump-commands-americans-not-to-check?

Expand full comment
Dutch Mike's avatar

Robert Kennedy said that you could eliminate that virus by drinking bleach, though.

Expand full comment
Linda Mitchell, KCMO's avatar

No: he said cod liver oil, not bleach. But incredibly stupid nonetheless.

Expand full comment
Anne-Louise Luccarini's avatar

Oh. Ah.

Expand full comment
Susan from OC's avatar

I love Borowitz!

Expand full comment
Eddie Current's avatar

LOL. We need a LOL on this site!

Expand full comment
Derek Smith's avatar

https://substack.com/@oldreddragon/note/c-97852911

Listening to somebody hurling f-bombs like there’s no tomorrow is very cathartic, and made me laugh so hard I woke the cats up.

Expand full comment
MLMinET's avatar

Well. I would say she’s passionate.

Expand full comment
Ally House (Oregon)'s avatar

I needed that. Thank you. RBMFFer is now in my lexicon.

Expand full comment
Steve Abbott's avatar

Each filled with those crappy 'My Pillow' pillows - at $124.99 a pop.

Expand full comment
Victoria E Graham's avatar

Repubs claim the pillow is ultra comfortable. I was gifted with one and discarded the lumpy thing filled with God knows what. It may have been filled by company owner making money from poor people collecting shoreline plastics... who knows, but the magas say they are comfortable! Amazing!

Expand full comment
Anne-Louise Luccarini's avatar

On credit?

Expand full comment
Dutch Mike's avatar

Yes yes, a loan at one of Musk's companies, of course.

Expand full comment
Virginia Witmer's avatar

Buy a Tesla. Put it in your front yard with flat tires and bashed in windows. That’s a comment that would really be noticeable.

Expand full comment
Susan from OC's avatar

Kia Norway was trolling Tesla on Instagram with this ad: https://www.instagram.com/firstpost/reel/DHEArhwvBcJ/

Expand full comment
Phil Balla's avatar

Thanks, Susan.

I went to your link but, once there, it was necessary to "sign in" and then who knows what further tech nonsense to ensue.

Expand full comment
Dutch Mike's avatar

You'll get yourself arrested if you do that, though...

Expand full comment
Virginia Witmer's avatar

But think what a court case you could get. You might even bring down the government! Thank you, Dutch Mike!

Expand full comment
Dutch Mike's avatar

Well, if the judges play along... But it's a great idea, actually ;)

Expand full comment
Virginia Witmer's avatar

IWhat if McConnell and Rand Paul could be persuaded to contribute a few Teslas? In Kentucky there are lots of front yards to take them in. Then there’s WV. Maybe Manchin would sell his yacht to save his country. 🤣🤣🤣

Expand full comment
Virginia Witmer's avatar

I should have added a “for sale” sign. Did you see the signs put on Teslas a few weeks ago? So much **** since then that I’ve forgotten the focus. But lots of fun. And thank you for the affirmation.🤣

Expand full comment
Russell John Netto's avatar

Perhaps Tesla could build a garbage truck especially for him.

Expand full comment
Mary Greenwald's avatar

As Trump proved on live TV, he does not know how to drive. Does Melania or Barron get the Tesla he bought? Even Queen Elizabeth did in fact drive. Poor Donny - a king who cannot drive. Except a golf cart on an open field.

Expand full comment
Phil Balla's avatar

" . . . he bought," Mary?

He never "bought" it, of course.

He has lied, and still lies about everything, you know that, yes?

Expand full comment
Robot Bender's avatar

Queen Elizabeth served as an ambulance driver during WW II. Can you even imagine Trump or Musk doing that?

Expand full comment
Sharon's avatar

They had all the EV chargers ripped out at government buildings and stopped them from being installed across the country. Now they want people to buy a car they can’t charge?

I can charge mine, which is now a Mini Countryman, with my solar in my garage but apartment dwellers don’t have that luxury. A regular outlet would take 31 hours for a full charge.

Expand full comment
Russell John Netto's avatar

I believe presidents are not allowed to drive on the open road anyway.

Expand full comment
Phil Balla's avatar

Today saw a video of Biden driving his vintage convertible, Russell.

It featured Jay Leno, too (a lover of classic American cars), and was filmed with Biden driving one of Jay's cars, in summertime. I'm thinking it was recent, when Joe was president, though someone may correct me on that.

Expand full comment
Gail Adams VA/FL's avatar

I saw that video. SS wouldn’t let him leave the White House grounds.

Expand full comment
Russell John Netto's avatar

There are some videos on YouTube dating from 2016 and 2022. I've read that Biden has signed up with a Los Angeles talent agency that also represents Brad Pitt and Ariana Grande (although Heaven only knows what for) and that there are rumours of another book.

Expand full comment
Karen Z's avatar

Like the one Trump rode around in during the campaign?

Expand full comment
Russell John Netto's avatar

Yes. The one he nearly fell over trying to get into - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lWSQc6aDmHE

He wanted to bring it to his inauguration but couldn't get it into the Capitol rotunda. It could yet reach iconic status as a symbol for his whole second term the way things are going.

Expand full comment
Anne-Louise Luccarini's avatar

I must go looking for the comics - they can make us laugh at the lies and other outrages.

Expand full comment
Joan Lederman's avatar

I'm with you on that idea and did you see "Heroes Come in All sizes'" comment?

I think Canada should call his bluff and ask to become part of the USA. Canada has 13 provinces, so they should be formed into 13 states. That's 26 additional Democratic senators and 40 additional Democratic members of the House.

Canadians are smart, sane, polite people. Let's let our 51st, 52nd, 53rd, 54th, 55th, 56th, 57th, 58th, 59th, 60th, 61st, 62nd, and 63rd new states help us impeach the felon/russian PINO and take our country back.

Expand full comment
Jan Dorsett's avatar

Our court jesters. Speaking truth to power—obliquely.

Expand full comment
Kathy's avatar

Jimmy Kimmel….”Was there a comedian on the Titanic?”

Trump Shamelessly Shills for Tesla, Hurls More Tariffs at Canada & Stock Market Suffers Bigly

https://youtu.be/vXvhtJy3KrE

Expand full comment
Garrett Mengel's avatar

I noticed that while Trimp "bought" a Swastikar, even he wouldn't touch the cybertruck. Don't you wonder whose money he used to buy it?

Expand full comment
Phil Balla's avatar

In one key sense, Garrett, he's using Elon's own massive contributions to him.

In another sense -- the one where we remember he has no personal life, and never has -- we recall how his "life" has always been nothing but getting money: millions from his father, more millions from Russian Dmitry Rybolovlev and then other money-laundering Russians, more millions from his base, from banks willing to look the other way (until his many bankruptcies).

Expand full comment
George A. Polisner's avatar

Thank you Professor Richardson.

I can assure you that MAGA is still celebrating despite the lack of relief from rising grocery prices, rent, utilities, healthcare, and insurance. Despite the return of predatory fees and intentionally obscure pricing the Biden Administration and the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau were addressing.

MAGA is celebrating because the criminal-elect and his South African Karen Billionaire are like Batman and Robin. Trump is the strongman leader who issues a directive and lets the cards fall where they may. We want Canada. We want Greenland. We want Gaza beachfront, presumably constructed over the bodies of women, children, and families. We want a leader of Ukraine who understands the greatness of kings and tyrants -and bows down appropriately -like every remaining member of the GOP Congress.

MAGA is celebrating because people who protest are being arrested and taken away. Especially people of color.

MAGA is celebrating because they don't yet realize the air they breathe, the water they drink, and the food they eat used to be inspected and protected by the Governmental agencies being destroyed by Trump, Vance & Space Karen.

MAGA is celebrating because real Americans want to prioritize taking care of the poor, hungry, and unhoused here in the United States -not in some "S*&thole" Country. (Just kidding, they don't care about the poor, hungry, and unhoused here in America).

MAGA is celebrating because they don't know that when they are sick, their children are sick, or their parents are sick -the medical bills were paid by Medicaid.

MAGA is celebrating because now their children can get a voucher and go to WalMart K-12 schools and don't yet know that private school costs will rise and the difference between the voucher and the tuition will gleefully be taken care of by Betsy DeVos or someone as greedy and sinister -because there's massive money to be made in student loans repaid over a lifetime.

MAGA will cheer when the criminal-elect and his policies lead to chaos, confusion, protests, and civil disobedience -and this Administration declares martial law and deploys the military into Blue States and cities -because the so-called "news" will show them rounding up people of color.

At some point MAGA will stop cheering but the billionaires will have their massive tax cuts -I guess that's a "silver lining".

Expand full comment
Jackie's avatar

There is an article in the WSJ (can’t read it bc of the paywall) where allegedly MAGAts are downplaying hits to their retirement accounts. Its definitely a cult, and you’ve laid it out in beautiful detail, George.

Expand full comment
GJ Loft ME CA FL IL NE CT MI's avatar

And Elon told Larry Kudlow the other day that he wants to get rid of Medicare, Medicaid and SS.

I guess the MAGAs are just supposed to suffer and die when the reach retirement age.

Expand full comment
Chris Johnston's avatar

Retirement? I’m pretty sure they expect everyone to work work work, until they die at their desk or place on the assembly line.

Expand full comment
J L Graham's avatar

It great disaster-porn for TV, until the rapid unscheduled disassembly of our way of life hits home.

Expand full comment
GJ Loft ME CA FL IL NE CT MI's avatar

Meanwhile, people are starting to curb their spending and shopping local as well.

It's funny how three or four airline mishaps are scaring people away from flying. If I fly anywhere it's going to be out of Canada to Europe or Asia avoiding US controlled air space.

Sean Duffy had a shouting match with Musk because Musk fired some air traffic controllers he said were DEI.

Expand full comment
lauriemcf's avatar

"Space Karen" - thank you for that -- it's perfect.

Expand full comment
George A. Polisner's avatar

I think I appropriated it from @Jeff Tiedrich -and agree -although it doesn’t necessarily belie the profound damage Musk has done and continues to do.

From my perspective his assets and wealth should be forfeited and he should be sent back to South Africa with his emerald mining parents.

Expand full comment
Monnina's avatar

Musk is, in his criminal oligarchic behaviour, like Thiel and Murdoch, an enactment of an illegal alien. All should be stripped of US citizenship.

Expand full comment
Mary Greenwald's avatar

They don't want him. He could quit playing favorites and take all 14 of his children to work. He could call it DDC- DONNY DAY CARE.

Expand full comment
Pat Goudey OBrien's avatar

Elon Musk is clearly out of his ever-luvvin’ mind! Calling Mark Kelly a traitor and speaking like THIS to the Foreign Minister of an ally country: “ Poland’s minister of foreign affairs, Radosław Sikorski, responded that “if SpaceX proves to be an unreliable provider we will be forced to look for other suppliers.” “Be quiet, small man,” Musk replied. “You pay a tiny fraction of the cost. And there is no substitute for Starlink.”

Musk is clearly showing his sense of being an Uber Mensch in our world, the sick, sick man.

Expand full comment
GJ Loft ME CA FL IL NE CT MI's avatar

One of the side effects of ketamine abuse is cognitive decline. Musk "swears" he only uses on occasion, but can he be trusted?

Trump and Musk were both born on 3rd base having inherited fortunes from daddy and mommy, plus they both grew up in white supremacist homes. At least Musk has scored a few runs, while Trump keeps getting picked off of 3rd base with failure after failure.

No mystery why they want to end diversity, equity and inclusion.

Expand full comment
Pat Goudey OBrien's avatar

Ketamine affects our desire to give up in the face of resistance and adversity [or failure] — It turns off a sense of futility, whether that sense is accurate or not. And that suppression of the impulse to call-it-quits becomes a part of our brain’s function. Perseveration and the tendency to just keep forging ahead, no matter what… No adequate “stop” function, which becomes permanent, especially if it is abused. Sound like it might be having an effect on the Muskrat?

Expand full comment
Happy Valley No More's avatar

I enjoyed your analogy 😂

Expand full comment
Sharon's avatar

Addicts will always use that line.

Expand full comment
Sandra Simpson's avatar

Mark Kelly for. President.

Expand full comment
Mary Greenwald's avatar

Absolutely not! He is a MAGA Democrat. How else do you account for his AYE votes for 8 of Trump's nominees? Kelly is not for President of the United States. He lacks courage and leadership.

Expand full comment
Lady Emsworth's avatar

"Be quiet, small man"

Can someone let us know which pub Melon drinks in?

I would love to be there when someone finally gives him that much needed slap. . .

Expand full comment
GJ Loft ME CA FL IL NE CT MI's avatar

I hear he's super paranoid and is always surrounded by security. Gee, I wonder who's paying for the security.

Expand full comment
Russell John Netto's avatar

His armed security team have now been deputised as federal marshals so they can now gain access to the White House. There was a report recently on MSNBC that suggested that it was these people, rather than proper federal marshals, who have been accompanying Musk's frat boys when they unlawfully enter federal buildings. It really is quite disturbing how this person Musk, described by the administration as a mere staffer, can wield so much power without supervision. In a recent court case, a judge ruled that DOGE's “unprecedented” powers and “unusual secrecy” made it necessary that it should submit records of its activities to the public - https://www.politico.com/news/2025/03/10/judge-orders-doge-record-release-00223151?nname=politico-toplines&nid=0000018f-3124-de07-a98f-3be4d1400000&nrid=00000170-3560-d60b-a9fd-776d3b1f0000

Expand full comment
John's avatar

I’ll bet a well-placed drone could take him and his security out in a New York minute.

Expand full comment
Cathy riddle's avatar

Hopefully while he’s standing next to the 🍊 idiot!

Expand full comment
Mary Greenwald's avatar

The U.S. Marshall's deputized his security detail. The head of that detail is a nose picker!

Expand full comment
Anne-Louise Luccarini's avatar

I'd prefer to witness a punch on the nose.

Expand full comment
Russell John Netto's avatar

People have often commented about how people's behaviour deteriorates when they comment on social media, saying things they would never say directly to another person. Some consider social media as a safety valve for the darker side of our nature. In the case of Musk and Trump, they seemed to have crossed the Rubicon and have brought their appalling social media personas into the real world.

Expand full comment
KSC's avatar
Mar 12Edited

Well the vote in Greenland was a resounding rebuke of Don Jr’s ‘diplomacy’ and I suspect the idea of allowing Musk and his chainsaw to eviscerate the social safety net they do have vis-a-vis Denmark. Trump-friendly Qulleq has received just over 260 of the approximately 27,000 votes. https://www.dn.se/varlden/demokraatit-segrar-i-gronlands-val/

Expand full comment
J L Graham's avatar

Thanks for the update.

"Trump-friendly Qulleq has received just over 260 of the approximately 27,000 votes."

That many??

Mr. Unreliable is not playing well abroad.

Expand full comment
horhai's avatar

Donold isn't holding the cards and not even close to playing with a full deck to begin with...

Expand full comment
GJ Loft ME CA FL IL NE CT MI's avatar

Sounds like 259 cases of voter fraud assuming Qulleq voted for himself.

Expand full comment
Lanette's avatar

That’s a bit of good news. Thank you.

Expand full comment
J L Graham's avatar

Another sort of story from British non-Billionaire owned press:

A bit of life imitating satire:

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/karoline-leavitt-dow-jones-stock-ticker-b2713199.html

Expand full comment
Beth B's avatar

"...I’m here to echo the remarks of this president of this White House..." President of the White House?!?!?

Expand full comment
J L Graham's avatar

Naw, the Galactic Empire.

Expand full comment
KSC's avatar

Perfect! Thanks.

Expand full comment
Anne-Louise Luccarini's avatar

Big smile. During their sales trip, they seem to have entertained the patrons of some local hostelry, so 260 votes is more than I'd have expected. Probably rigged....

Expand full comment
Eddie Current's avatar

Excellent. i hadn't heard this news. Those 260 votes are from the 1%?

Expand full comment
KSC's avatar
Mar 12Edited

My guess they are the Don Jr groupies that were paid to show up on his magical MAGA visit….https://www.euractiv.com/section/politics/news/postcard-from-nuuk-youtubers-and-maga-hats-take-over-greenland/

In all seriousness it is presumptuous of me to analyze what is a very complicated situation of a most Inuit people living under Danish protectorate conditions. There has been a very inhuman policy from the 70s in which women, mostly young teens had IUDs inserted to prevent single motherhood without parental consent and often completely unbeknownst to the woman herself. See https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-66990670.amp

Expand full comment
Russell John Netto's avatar

You're clearly a keen observer of Nordic politics. There's also the scandal in Greenland of Denmark's parenting competency tests - https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/jan/20/denmark-to-ditch-parenting-competency-tests-for-greenlandic-families

The centre-right appears to have won the election. They favour a more gradual move towards independence - I guess many Greenlanders like Danish healthcare and welfare benefits (another reason for them not to want to join the US, especially now).

Expand full comment
KSC's avatar

Yes needs must, living here🙃

Expand full comment
MLMinET's avatar

I heard that yesterday for the first time and was appalled.

Expand full comment
Anne-Louise Luccarini's avatar

"Karoline Leavitt advised, “If people are looking for certainty, they should look at the record of this president.”

Not everyone will find that suggestion comforting."

First LOL - thanks, Heather.

Expand full comment
Mitch Wright's avatar

The press secretary was accidentally correct: I am certain that this president cannot be trusted.

Expand full comment
Happy Valley No More's avatar

The press secretary is a snot!

Expand full comment
Thomas Epley's avatar

She is horrible!

Expand full comment
James Vander Poel's avatar

And the 70 million who voted for him have yet to get a clue. That's the scary part.

Expand full comment
Cynthia Erb's avatar

Yes. I live in a red state and the MAGA people bullishly proclaim Trusk must be allowed to cut fraud and waste.

Expand full comment
Lady Emsworth's avatar

Well, some of Elon's contracts would be a good start. . .

Expand full comment
GJ Loft ME CA FL IL NE CT MI's avatar

And cut DonOld's golf, travel and security budget by 90%.

Expand full comment
Eddie Current's avatar

Until they lose their jobs...

Expand full comment
Sandra Simpson's avatar

I saw the New York Times headlines about the Democrats are fighting about what to do next. I am starting to think we need to write as many letters and comments to the Democrats about their leadership as we are about the complaints about Trump. Maybe we should make a list and send it to the Democrats.

Expand full comment
GJ Loft ME CA FL IL NE CT MI's avatar

I mean no disrespect but why are you still reading The NY Times? Even Fox News and the Wall Street Journal have turned against Trump and Musk, while the Times is still looking for ways to blame the Democrats for everything that's wrong with the world.

How many stories has the Times written about Bernie and Elizabeth traveling around the country with their message? The Times cares about one thing - $$$$$$. The Democrats are far from boring. Listen to the political guests on Progress Radio (XM-127). They have a message, but the lame stream media isn't about to advertise it because their advertisers want ratings not hope and common sense.

Read Paul Krugman's account about why he left the Times and what his last year (2024) was like when the editors removed any signs of Trump bashing. He said, from 2000 - 2023 they NEVER did that.

Expand full comment
lauriemcf's avatar

I've kept my NYT subscription - which guarantees disappointment after disappointment every morning with their beige coverage of events. I keep it b/c I live in the city and want the local news and am also hoping to see this once fine paper turn the corner and become fine again.

Expand full comment
Joan Lederman's avatar

The word "beige" says it well. I appreciate the Daily podcast.

Expand full comment
lauriemcf's avatar

I like that too!

Expand full comment
Joan Lederman's avatar

Thx for the pointer to Progress Radio -- I continually search for sources, listened yesterday to Krugman about his leaving NYT, and will pay more attention to insider news of Ukraine from Deny https://www.youtube.com/@DenysDavydov/videos. I still subscribe to NYT and was interested to hear, in yesterday's The Daily podcast, the voices of Greenlanders who would like to be part of the USA.

Expand full comment
Russell John Netto's avatar

The NYT's news coverage is still very good, especially Maggie Haberman. Some of the opinion pieces are ridiculous.

Expand full comment
GJ Loft ME CA FL IL NE CT MI's avatar

Maggie Haberman is an amazing journalist. She also has an amazing voice. Once in a while, I've caught her singing when an ad finishes playing on a podcast, etc.

I was extremely excited to see that my other favorite economist besides Paul Krugman is joining the weekend lineup on MSNBC -- Catherine Rampell. I'm not sure if she quit the WAPO or not but I have missed her since I dropped my subscription a while back. And Ruth Markus quit the WAPO last week when her latest op-ed was rejected by Bezos's cronies.

Expand full comment
Russell John Netto's avatar

I guess that's why so many talented writers are now on Substack.

Expand full comment
MLMinET's avatar

Gary, I listen to Progressive Radio from time to time. Besides Hartmann’s program being laden with ad after ad, which is particularly irritating, I find the hosts are can be hyperbolic. It worries me that constant listening could be doing on the progressive side what Fox has done on the other side. Except for the constant lying, of course.

Expand full comment
GJ Loft ME CA FL IL NE CT MI's avatar

It's an acquired taste, like listening to Rush Limbaugh was. I did a lot of driving across Kansas, Iowa, Missouri, Nebraska and Minnesota in the 1990's. The radio choices in the rural areas back then were C&W and Rush Limbaugh. Of course when you were close to any of the major cities you had a nice variety. I've never really acquired a taste for most C&W music.

Expand full comment
Mary Greenwald's avatar

Start with KELLY, KLOBUCHAR, DURBIN AND WHITEHOUSE

Expand full comment
Scott Helmers's avatar

The chaos and uncertaintly is totally destabilizing of everything. There is a core of irredeemable Trump cultists of ill defined numbers. His Electoral College win, while not representing a majority of voters, was achieved with a segment beyond the cultists, seemingly just wanting something different. Or, they had a myriad of reasons from inherent racism to misogyny to basic ignorance. Nevertheless, they are absolutely blameworthy. No rational body of humans should ever choose to be led by an ignorant, mean spirited narcissist with progressing dementia. In this mental state and mental disturbance, Trump is almost certainly not going to retreat from killing our economy and destroying our international alliances. We cannot assess if Vance would be better, but his overall mental state is probably stable.

Unfortunately, impeaching and removing Trump would take an insurmountable transformation of Republican Congress persons, who evince all evidence of being as ignorant as they are cowardly.

Expand full comment
Just Sayin''s avatar

I lay primary responsibility for this situation on the 5 million democrats who couldn’t be bothered to show up and vote in November ‘24. This inanity was blatantly foretold. There isn’t a political solution for the reward we are reaping. We had the capacity to avoid this and we didn’t.

Expand full comment
Carla Childress's avatar

You may want to watch this. https://youtu.be/P_XdtAQXnGE?si=HK7tRc2XNDeIBGKP

It’s not so much they didn’t bother and more that they were prevented.

Expand full comment
Ally House (Oregon)'s avatar

I think it is a split between "prevented" and "it makes no difference". I'd love to see the stats.

Expand full comment
Just Sayin''s avatar

It’s pretty simple; Biden got millions more votes in 2020 than Harris in 2024. Where did those additional voters go?

Expand full comment
Joseph J. Dunn's avatar

Agreed, the current Republican members of the Senate and House are complicit in this mess. But the remedy is at hand, as every single Republican member of the House is up for election in November 2026. Once agin, the country is in the hands of the voters.

Expand full comment
Happy Valley No More's avatar

JD would be no better. His personal ideology is anti democratic. Just check out who his mentors were/are.

Expand full comment
Ally House (Oregon)'s avatar

You mean handlers, don't you?

Expand full comment
Bill Pierce's avatar

Yes, the disenfranchising practice of the “winner take all” States must end.

Expand full comment
J L Graham's avatar

“Traitor? Elon, if you don’t understand that defending freedom is a basic tenet of what makes America great and keeps us safe, maybe you should leave it to those of us who do.”

Classy.

Expand full comment
Sandra Simpson's avatar

It is MRGA. Make Russia great again.

Expand full comment
Bill Katz's avatar

I’m sorry I didn’t short Tesla a month ago. But I have taken very good advantage to the madness in the stock markets. Gains can be made going up as well as going down. I’m not offering advice in fact I would suggest not to do as I say it’s not for everyone. But it will allow me to make more gift-giving to causes and organizations that are rapidly being defunded like public television and the Associated Press. We can’t sustain 4 years of this madness. Absolute madness.

Expand full comment
Sandra Simpson's avatar

Now that’s a solution based answer take advantage of the down in the stock market so you can give NPR I love that

Expand full comment
Raymond n Pfeuffer jr's avatar

Gold and German defense stocks had a good day. Can we see what's coming?

Expand full comment
Eddie Current's avatar

Spanish stocks have been doing well. As a US Expat I hope to invest in European military stocks and bonds and in the replacement for Starlink, which can't be relied upon.

Expand full comment
Anne-Louise Luccarini's avatar

Er, I'm rubbing my eyes...

Expand full comment
Sharon's avatar

I sold all my Tesla stock the day the ketamine fueled “genius” used money from Saudi Arabia (read Russia) to b buy Twitter.

Expand full comment
Rich Merrill's avatar

I remember when the Delta Chairman lauded trump’s election and the potential to dispense with those silly consumer protections. All I can do at the moment is laugh.

The presidency of the U.S. is a tag team of Thing One and Thing Two.

Imagine being on a flight and have Elon shut off crucial air traffic control communications just because he was having a fit. No thanks.

Expand full comment
Happy Valley No More's avatar

Thing One and Thing Two 😂😂😂 who is one and who is two? Interchangeable? Made me laugh!

Expand full comment
Mary Hardt's avatar

Rich, or Elon shutting down air traffic control to hold the US hostage until we pay the ransom.

Expand full comment
Joe Weldon's avatar

Someone recently reported that some individuals in the national management department are users and recreational users of Ketamine. After reading this (j/https://www.dea.gov/sites/default/files/2020-06/Ketamine-2020.pdf), I would suggest that anyone using this controlled substance probably has no business making decisions that could have serious negative effects on the lives of others.

Expand full comment
Constance McCutcheon's avatar

Still don't know what Trump's tariff war is meant to accomplish. He said “We have to rebuild our country.” How is playing a game of tariff chicken with America's allies supposed to do that?

Expand full comment
Cynthia Erb's avatar

When it comes to this economic wreckage, I still can’t figure out whether Trump does it due to incompetence, or his allegiance to a certain foreign leader, or his apparent dementia. Maybe all three. And I’m amazed to be able to say I told you so to business and media titans who salivated about the tax cuts and insisted they would easily manage Trump.

Expand full comment
J L Graham's avatar

They are showing some surprise as the monster they created breaks it's tether.

Expand full comment
Sandra Simpson's avatar

War. Trump wants to support the dialogue that Canada and Mexico has been taking advantage of the USA for years. Trump wants the American people to retaliate against Canada and ignore what the United States is doing. It’s all about war.

Expand full comment
Alfhard's avatar

Trump's statement that Canada and Mexico have been taking advantage of the USA for years is just one more of the constant lies coming out of his mouth. Apparently, with Canada he is referring to the trade deficit. However, if you take oil out of the equation, raw oil, which is sold to the USA on a discount and then refined and processed in the USA, the USA actually enjoys a trade SURPLUS of $60 billion with Canada. Even with oil, all the value added is done in the USA..

Today, Trump also said that will "personally shut down the automobile manufacturing business in Canada". Well, of the cars and trucks made by the D3 (GM, Ford and Stellantis), 420,000 were exported by Canada into the USA and 700,000 were exported by the USA into Canada, so even here, the USA has a SURPLUS of 280,000 cars. Trump should be careful what he wants to accomplish. If he manages to move all car manufacturing by the D3 into the USA, as is his aim, how is that going to benefit the US auto industry? Canadians are already engaging in a wide spread boycott of travel to the USA and buying anything made in the US. If Trump wipes out the Canadian auto industry, with all the layoffs that will cause in Canada, Canadians will solidly boycott all cars made by the D3. There are enough good cars made by Europe, Japan and South Korea. So, the US industry is going to lose close to 300,000 cars sold to Canada. How is that supposed to be positive to anybody?

Expand full comment
Bill Katz's avatar

Don’t believe anything he says it’s all fake. He uses threats to affect policy. It does work up to a point. Take Ukraine. There might actually be a peace in the making. Trump only wants a truce in order to get a noble peace price but I trust they will never give in to this trash. So he offered Putin favors then retracted them. It keeps everyone guessing. And can lead to a positive ending. But it also causes disruptions.

Expand full comment
Dee of the Terrace's avatar

For trump it's all a SHOW...good TV. He's always on stage. I believe that he's in growing danger from his own base who's believed his lies. He's moving closer to paying the price for his betrayal.

Expand full comment
lauriemcf's avatar

Always on stage is exactly right -- as long as he's in the spotlight the world is fine, so he'll do whatever it takes to have the focus kept on himself.

Expand full comment
J L Graham's avatar

His brain is squirming like a toad.

Expand full comment
Reese Johnson's avatar

Rebuild our country in Russia's image.

Expand full comment
Sharon's avatar

He thinks stopping steel imports will bring Canadian car manufacturers to a halt and can’t comprehend that it would shut down all the manufacturers in the U.S.

And how will Musk build his rockets without steel?

Expand full comment
Mitch Wright's avatar

Musk’s implication that Ukraine had attacked “X” needs to be proven or debunked. Of course, who needs facts when you religiously oppose fact checking?

These guys are inveterate liars and self-serving misanthropes.

Expand full comment
Russell John Netto's avatar

There's reporting on Wired yesterday that Twitter/X was subjected to a DDOS attack which security experts have said comes from 'botnets', armies of computers that have been hijacked for this purpose so the IP address isn't conclusive evidence that Ukraine was responsible. They've also found that some X origin servers, which respond to web requests, weren't properly secured behind the company's Cloudflare DDoS protection and were publicly visible. One researcher found that Ukraine wasn't even in the top 20 IP addresses linked to the attack. Musk appears to have been lying as you say!

Expand full comment
lin•'s avatar

Children are suffering in a spreading measles outbreak and will be denied not only school lunches but public education.

Seniors who are lucky enough to have retirement plans are watching them tank at the same time Republicans are trashing the Social Security Administration.

Expand full comment
Lady Emsworth's avatar

Doesn't matter if you are young or old, sick or well - trump is an "equal opportunities" impoverisher.

Expand full comment