633 Comments
⭠ Return to thread

Here we are, back in an America "half slave and half free" and this time I cannot share Lincoln's expectation the Union would hold.

Last week on Tuesday, we saw the Establishment Clause of Article I attacked.

On Wednesday, the meaning of the Second Amendment was smashed.

On Thursday they assaulted the Fourth, Fifth, Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments and called the Warren Court criminal justice civil rights cases "prophylactic" law the court didn't have the right to create.

Friday they went after the "substantive due process justice" of the Fourteenth Amendment.

And next Thursday they go after the ability of the government to enforce the laws that are passed.

The marauding reactionaries of this illegitimate super-majority are now the Enemies of America.

Expand full comment

Let’s talk about sex. And each of us better be very clear about what we think, what we accept as personal choice….or not.

Leigh McGowan, Politics Girl roared onto the scene yesterday with one of her kitchen rants. I look to her as a strong messaging personality for democracy.

Yesterday, I credit her with one of the best closing lines ever.

Here’s her link. Important listen. Under 2 minutes.

https://youtu.be/nZ5fZq2Rvw8

Expand full comment

I have a good friend, smart lady, whose refrain is 'I am just one person, I can't make a difference.' Rather than find her a fainting couch, she is now my mission. I sent her this Politics Girl episode (thank you). Wish me luck. It's all about the ripple effect. Inform/support those around you and trust the message will multiply, right up to Election Day.

Expand full comment

"I am only one, but still I am one. I cannot do everything, but still I can do something. And because I cannot do everything, I will not refuse to do the something I can do."

Edward Everett Hale

Expand full comment

Than you for this; good medicine.

Expand full comment

Thank you for this quote!!!

Expand full comment

She alludes to what I have always found SO hypocritical. Republicans are all for "smaller government", but that is a lie. They want government to dictate to everybody how they should live their lives, AND the sex they can or can't have, ALL under the guise of their f***ed up version of Christianity. THAT is "smaller government"???

Expand full comment

Religion is poison to civil society

Expand full comment

Bruce: Yes x 1,000!!!

Expand full comment

Bruce, it is intended for "small" minds.

Expand full comment

Exactly, Bruce! They’re living large (on us) in the *Nation’s Capital*, inflicting their hateful, narrow, back-a$$wards thinking on We the People, All of us?!?!

Not small at all!

Expand full comment

We should all be as outraged as Leigh McGowan. I want this to be capsulized, then crammed down the throats of Alito, Thomas, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, Roberts and Barrett.

Expand full comment

Particularly K and B.

Expand full comment

The Handmaiden and the wannabe rapist, of course.

Expand full comment

My goodness! Wouldn't they both be surprised to see themselves thus described. When I think about his lengthy cross-examination, with sworn witnesses, and her quick whisk through the pseudo-process..... same result in each case.

Expand full comment

I can still see the chilling sneer on Kavanaugh's face when being questioned by Amy Klobuchar, and his sarcastic rejoinder regarding his drinking, asking her if she liked to drink. This was after Sen. Klobuchar shared that her father had suffered from alcoholism. We all saw his unbridled rage at being doubted, because his class standing at Yale was exemplary! I knew right then that he was temperamentally unfit for the bench, regardless of whether he had attacked Dr. Blasey Ford. As for Amy Coney Barrett, she'd display her deer-in-the-headlights frozen smile, no doubt the result of years of cult conditioning, especially when she was lying shamelessly.

Expand full comment

Great closing line!!!!!! TY

Expand full comment

She is, in my judgement....right on!!! Thank you Christine. Decided to do yoga, and walk instead of start my day with Heather and remain in awe and fear of our super backwards nation, ruled by a minority, felt by a majority....and it will hurt!!

Abortion is of course not a practical means of birth control, but shit happens and it is a teaching moment. As I have said before, planned parenthood will not do an abortion, without starting a person immediately on birth control of some sort and educate, educate, educate. There are so many variables, it is not black and white like the robes of the Supreme Court folks against their white faces (most of them). Medical concerns ONLY belong in the privacy and safety of a medical office. We are trained to care for these women and yes men, as they are the other half of the issue. Indeed they are, and there will be pain all around.

Maybe concentrate on the safety of kids in our schools who really wish to grow up, and not be dismembered by an assault rifle.

Above all, it seems to me that there are some huge pressing issues in our world to work on, to maintain life on this planet. Shouldn't that be the priority of the men in black?

Expand full comment

Yep. they do. Thanks for this link. They plan to do it in many ways and are at it already which is why I call them the party of death.

Expand full comment

While doing voter registration in 1998 , I found myself at a gay pride celebration - a treasured souvenir which I still have is a button - One Can Only Do So Much - there is a line drawn through the word Only. Each one teach one & good luck to all of this in the disunited states where the long shot is capable of pulling out the win in the final stretch.

Expand full comment

Thank you! Watched it and am now following her on twitter.

Expand full comment

So should all Tweeters.

Expand full comment

That is awesome. Thanks for posting it.

Expand full comment

She nailed it, thanks for the link. The idea of having a sexually repressed evangelical fanatic in my bedroom or on my porch for that matter, (yes you can have sex on the porch), is way beyond anything I would find acceptable. Let this decision be the bridge too far, and let it be the beginning of the end of the repugnican party, I want to see them go howling off into the darkness where their screams only fall on deaf ears.

Expand full comment

Yes.

Expand full comment

Best. Message. Ever! Thanks so much, Christine.

Expand full comment

I had been waiting to hear her reaction to the stench of the court last week. Her podcasts have been stellar lately. But when I saw this posted yesterday and listened, I sent it out immediately to my contact base and then I let Leigh McGowan know her rant is a grand slam.

It’s time to talk about sex. It doesn’t matter what adult age one is, what one does or does not practice. It is time to talk about in unfettered terms what we support in this time of 2022 and acknowledge that we hear the Gilead tone in their rulings and not hide from what they are saying they want to impose on us.

And let them know, well….let them know….you have lost your compass of justice. We hear but we will not abide. And by the way (optional comment of course….)We have removed the hands-free steering from the clown car and are derailing you. Go f*ck yourselves because you do not have my permission to do that to me and mine.

Salud, Lynell my sister!

Expand full comment

Yes, yes, a thousand times yes!

Salute, Sister Christine!

(SA/HRUD is how you write "salud" in stenotype!)

Expand full comment

I love PoliticsGirl!

Expand full comment

This is a powerful 2 minutes!!! Thanks for the link!!!!!

Expand full comment

I am always so happy you post Politics Girl rants. She always seems to sum up the moment. “How do you feel about sex? Because the republicans are out to F*CK YOU” should be our new conversation opener.

Expand full comment

I agree, Michele. Depending on the recipient, we could substitute that word with "FUBAR"!

Expand full comment

Oh, so very true! Thank you for sharing this! If I were not campaigning as a Democrat for Treasurer of my Republican county in which I live.... I would share this on Facebook! However, I have been told by a Republican friend that if I want to win this upcoming election I need to stay off of Facebook! Duhhhhhh!

Expand full comment

Send it to NPA/Independent voters.

Salud!

Expand full comment

Thanks for link. Yes, great expression of outrage and punchy punch line. We are being forced to comply with some crazy dogma and better come up with a strategy that’s more effective than the one we’ve been using to counter the immoral moralists.

Expand full comment

"The marauding reactionaries of this illegitimate super-majority are now the Enemies of America."

In other words: Supreme Court justices are now paid lackey's of corporations and the Federalist Society (also a paid lackey of corporations) to crawl on their knees and do the bidding of a few very wealthy, white folks who are tired of having to worry about government regulation or the American voter.

Or consider anything but their own wants.

I wonder when the Supreme Court will rule that private property owned in Maine is to be confiscated and provided to "loyal patriots"??

Expand full comment

Um...why Maine private property in particular...what have I missed?

Expand full comment

Just a random northern state.

Expand full comment

There must be a path to true justice somewhere within this farce of a judicial branch! In his speech, “Remaining Awake Through a Great Revolution,” — and the name of that speech is so significant — the noble and wise MLK articulated these exquisite words: “We shall overcome because the arc of the moral universe is long but it bends toward justice.” At this point in my life, TC, I simply have to believe in “remaining awake” and in keeping his pellucid vision at the forefront of my thoughts. After all, we are still a democratic nation … in spirit.

Expand full comment

Ah, pellucid ~ translucently clear, a new word for me, Rowshan!! Thank you.

Expand full comment

You’re most welcome! I discovered it during my dissertation and have loved it ever since.

Expand full comment

Thanks. Still on the first cup. I was unable to get the word right in my head in order to even sound it out (I was muttering "peelicud; what the heck could that be").

Expand full comment

Still on my first cup too and I had never even seen that word. I may have to use it. I always learn something here.

Expand full comment

I am so glad I am here....I am sure I learn something new here every day that I sign in! That is a good thing!

Expand full comment

time for that second cup!

Expand full comment

I don’t necessarily agree with the assertion about the arc bending toward justice, much though I admire the articulator. Just look at history.

Simply staying awake isn’t going to cut it in this country any more. It’s almost past time for action within “normal” channels, especially for women.

Expand full comment

We can’t give up! I, for one, am too old to give up!

Expand full comment

I’m also too old to give up, but I sure wish I still had the energy I had in my 20s. I get discouraged because I can’t get my children to understand where things are headed. They are from a generation that takes all these rights for granted because it’s all they’ve ever known, but I can remember how things were without them.

Expand full comment

So true. I had a roommate back in 1971 who had to fly to New York to get an abortion. Dumb me, I mentioned this in a group of women whom at the time I didn't know were right to life proponents. Yikes, did I ever get a reaction.

Expand full comment

I, too, had to fly to New York in 1972. My IUD was still in place, which I was told gave me a 50% chance of miscarrying,and I had been taking prescription meds for the first two months, which could affect fetal development and cause birth defects. I was married, but we’d recently gotten back together after a four month separation, and the marriage was still rocky. Do I regret having to make that choice? Yes. Do I regret the choice I made? No.

Expand full comment

Rowshan, this is very well said! Also, this old Latin major thanks you for pellucid, a combination of per (through or thoroughly) and lux (light, hence, clear). ☺️

Expand full comment

Thanks so much for the Latin roots, Camilla!

Expand full comment

“Remaining Awake Through a Great Revolution” indeed! That is the most basic task we are called to right now. Thank you Rowshan for posting this.

Expand full comment

these Justices think that only they know what is lawful, not any of the Justices before them. Such Hubris.

Expand full comment

There is a casual cruelty to overturning Roe vs Wade while striking down gun regulations. Human life is not the value being protected. It’s all about power and putting women back in their place.

My state is run by a libertarian turned autocrat who routinely demands that “his” conservative majority legislature take even more extreme positions. Gilead is being constructed in front of our eyes.

Expand full comment

Agree Diane Love. I choke on the laughable inconsistencies in the Republican talking points - and yet, they garner huge fan bases. Just like the true Republican platform has nothing to do with freedom, it’s supporters only value their own self-image, not humanity, and not justice. We need to stop engaging with their arguments as if they are meant to be logical or valid or to persuade. They are only meant as distractions and cudgels. We need to stop litigating and validating their inanities and pouring effort into winning arguments against ourselves, and start speaking clearly about the truths and likely outcomes Republicans will keep driving towards. PoliticsGirl (see above in this thread) is on the right track. When we say we need to “stop being nice,” it doesn’t mean we become them, and swerve into ad hominem attacks and try and bury the world in BS. It means we stop intellectualizing their fascism and start clearly articulating OUTCOMES that people struggle to imagine, but are in clear view if you follow “conservative” platforms. We need to become relentlessly clear about the dark, selfish, unjust place they are swiftly taking us, and what it says about us as human beings if we allow ourselves to be duped into paving the way.

Expand full comment

I found this piece to be a wry & apt explanation of the GOP. It's a Twitter thread, but is retype as an essay at the bottom.

https://m.dailykos.com/stories/2022/6/13/2103841/-This-Ex-Republican-Just-Tweeted-The-Best-Thread-About-What-The-GOP-Is-About-Ever

Expand full comment

Thanks, BetsyC! Excellent piece. Needs broadcasting!

Expand full comment

Thanks for this link, Betsy. It really is that simple. Dems are too busy brainiac'ing. Now all that needs to be done is to cause our ideas to become their ideas. It's a concept that I learned for training horses. I tried it on my "opposition reflex" husband a few times and it worked!

Expand full comment

Isn't reverse psychology great?! Wish the Democratic Party would try it.

Expand full comment

"It means we stop intellectualizing their fascism and start clearly articulating OUTCOMES that people struggle to imagine, but are in clear view if you follow 'conservative' platforms."

This is what has bothered me all along, Craig. Hurray for intellectuals, but saying what the "clear OUTCOMES" are is what we need to do.

Expand full comment

And this take........

Ron DeSantis and the Rise of Incoherent Folk Libertarianism

It’s not so much “Don’t Tread on Me” as it is “Only Tread on People and Things I Don’t Like.”

Read in The Daily Beast:

https://apple.news/AHynv0cw0QZC8j8OBfsjVZg

Expand full comment

Good analysis though I’d prefer “fake” libertarian to

“Folk” libertarian. Freedom is a one way street to DeSantis. His way or no way.

Expand full comment

I noted this, too: kids:guns. As if women have to provide fodder for men's guns! And I wonder: if we don't get equal protection, do we need to pay equal taxes? I hear the coffee in prison's not great - but Hey! I'm 95, and I could stick it out! L&B&L

Expand full comment

I'm with you, Ida. I'm younger than you, but as I told my daughter this weekend, I know what I'm going to be doing for the rest of my life.

Expand full comment

Hello Annie! My youngest daughter shares your name as did my mother and grandmother. I'm in CT not so far away. The rest of my life, I hope will be spent in this one room greenhouse w/eat in kitchen and two baths that I've made of a larger apartment, departing feet first if I'm lucky. They say the good die young so I guess I'm pretty baaaaaad!

My entertainment centers around my computer, from where I keep in touch with a few friends - not old ones: they're all dead - younger ones! And one of my six children is within yelling distance, two only a few minutes away, the others in Seattle, Manhattan, and on the Vineyard.

What ARE you going to do for the rest of your life? L&ı‡Ò

Expand full comment

Diane, can Val Demmings win in FL? I am so hoping she does. 🙏🏼

Expand full comment

There is a real chance and I’ve upped my monthly donations. Please support her if you can.

Expand full comment

Thanks for your perspective about Demings. I had been donating to her campaign irregularly. With your hopeful message, I will add her to the list of my regulars.

Expand full comment

And can someone defeat DeSantis?

Expand full comment

Little hope of defeating DeSantis at this point. Our candidates aren’t strong enough and he throws just enough “favors” to the other side to keep us off balance. Overturning Roe v Wade could be an opening for Democrats if we can seize it.

Expand full comment

You nailed it — who are the potential Democratic presidential candidates able to beat DeSantis in the present climate? I don't see them.

Expand full comment

I see the Republican candidate, who if things go the way of democracy in Nov 2022, that can def beat DeSantis. Liz Cheney.

Expand full comment

The goddamn heart button still doesn’t work, but I wanted to send you one❤️

Expand full comment

His veto of the Everglades water discharge bill was a stroke of genius. Shaking my head.

Expand full comment

He’s really good at this. Just when anger starts to boil over, be turns the heat down a bit. He’s truly dangerous.

Expand full comment

Diane Love, I agree. Vulnerability. It’s essentially about “Who gets protection from being vulnerable.” The gun craziness, at its core, defines an abhorrence of vulnerability. Gun owners and ammo junkies are arming themselves because they feel VULNERABLE. Yet women must accept being vulnerable. Irrationally, in the self-righteous, conservative mind, it’s “God’s Plan”, even though there is a Commandment, I believe that says “Thou shalt not kill”. Somehow that supposedly does not apply to the killing of someone entering your home to steal your flat screen, or walk in your neighborhood while black, or knock on your door while being black. But a woman must be okay with nine months plus of being vulnerable in the most intimate and all consuming way, because of ….why?……the “Sanctity of Life”? Gun sales, gun ownership and ammo-hoarding prove the true value they place on Life’s preciousness and sanctity”. “Conservatives” want to “end abortion”? It will NEVER happen. The reality of choosing abortion goes so way beyond “oops! I’m pregnant!” It is needed and necessary healthcare. “Conservatives” only impose more vulnerability, and by extension, cruelty, on women, forcing them to carry, and birth an unwanted pregnancy. But dooming them to vulnerability, while fortifying their own obscene, protective fortress-arsenal, is the self-righteous, ongoing farce we are left to mind-numbingly fight against.

Expand full comment

". . . casual cruelty. . ." Exactly.

Expand full comment

Carmen

just now

A super majority only in the court, installed by a radicalized minority

Expand full comment

You have really tied it all together. Thank you.

Expand full comment

TC, this is an excellent summary. I will quote you today, since I spent most of the previous 2 hours arguing with people in my head. You have allowed me to gather all of my bullet point, and some of yours, and put them into a magazine to use effectively.

Expand full comment

Paul Krugman has a great title for his book of columns" "Arguing with Zombies."

Expand full comment

I will have to remember how you have put this, Ally. I let one person have it yesterday and he said I had left him speechless (obviously, I hadn't) and then told me to take a nap whereupon he got it again. Haven't looked at Facebook today, so don't know if he has to have the last word. Good thing he wasn't actually right in front of me because I would have certainly been tempted....

Expand full comment

I'm gonna start something on Facebook today, I think. I've not gone there...yet.

Expand full comment

I'll be looking for it.

Expand full comment

If you want what I said in greater detail, go check That's Another Fine Mess for the past weekend.

Expand full comment

I will quote you today, too, TC!

Expand full comment

With the judicial coup orchestrated by Mitch McConnell and conservative Republicans, we are now living in the TRA: Theocratic Republic of America.

Just now, the Court issued a new proclamation: Prayer and religious indoctrination in public schools is fully supported by the government.

There is no end in sight unless we register more voters to increase the Democrat's Senate and House majorities so President Biden can expand the Court.

Expand full comment

The two-faced, double tongued corpse of Puritanism has been re-animated and now populates the whackdoodle religious far right.

I am strongly against forced public prayer in school...for one thing, freedom to practice one's own religion was a basic right. That was one of the founding principles.

If a school wants to devote a few moments to silent prayer or meditation...that would be fine...but that is not, I fear, what the "marauding reactionaries have in mind"* (*thanks for the phrase, TCinLA)

Expand full comment

I am now pretty conversant with the arguments the justices used - the Alito trunk of the tree, and the branches - the two concurrences, and the magnificent, if poignant, single dissent.

I have gained through the powerful analyses of numerous others in articles and in podcasts what I could not have on my own - an understanding of the shoddy cherry-picked historical references, the arrogant self-referencing of Thomas in his citations, and so forth. The great legal minds are picking this clean.

What I do understand is how shattered the Supreme Court. It is, of course, a court of men (generic sense), and we are all flawed. But any illusion I held that the Court operates in studied, scholarly neutrality is now gone. I will miss my naïveté- it was comforting.

Alito changed almost nothing of significance from the leaked document. He did not water it down, nor did he use the arguments shredding it in the interim between the leak and the final version to bolster his own case for the majority. To me that shows the deep arrogance that intelligent people often hold.

Thomas’ concurrence at least has the virtue of an honest warning. They are coming for most of the important jurisprudence that is neither originality nor deeply rooted in American tradition. So Roe is merely the first giant oak to tumble. Most of the other laws that deal with intimate human conduct are merely waiting for the axe. I say “most” because, in stunning but unsurprising self-interest, Thomas overlooked Loving v Virginia, the case that permitted interracial marriage. I guess Ginni might not have been chuffed had that completely similar law been teed up for the axe to fall.

It seems that Roberts’ “concurrence” was an act of personal pique showing that he knows this is not his Court any longer. “You didn’t need to this far”, he said, perhaps trying to play the long game of regaining (eventually) personal power through swing vote status. Judicially, this was a concurrence that seems to be personal rather than scholarly - and thus rather a waste of paper.

I save Kavanaugh’s concurrence for the last, for he seems to me to be the most contemptible and dishonest figure on the court. His is a “Don’t worry. Be happy. Everything else is going to be just fine” document. Kavanaugh has always struck me at bottom as a man of low self-esteem who more than anything else in life wants to be liked. He has about him a forced affability, but it is a strain to maintain it and he lashes out under pressure. He is the least qualified to be on the SC and I doubt whether he has much respect even amongst his allies in the Tribe of Six.

Finally the dissent. It was a cri de coeur, more personal I gather than most Supreme Court writings are and more biting as well. Thank God for it. This is a lonely call in the dark for justice, exquisitely suited to the mood of the nation. It must be a bitter moment though for Breyer who will exit the Court with the majority of the other justices seemingly calling out in derision, “Don’t let the door slam behind you.”

There will be a group photo of course with all the judges smiling. Some will even mean it.

And their work is not done. We have a tough week ahead with more unsurprising balls and strikes to be called.

What a struggle lies ahead for America to regain a legitimate claim on democracy and in the process, its standing in the world. As a Canadian, I am praying for a miracle. If your country crashes, ours might not be far behind.

Expand full comment

Go read Alito's warning about "prophylactic rules" in Vega, issued on Thursday. "A violtion of Miranda is not a violation of the Fifth Amendment" and he wants to go after Gideon, Mapp, and the rest of the criminal justice rules.

Expand full comment

What a nightmare. I’m not at all sure of this “prophylactic rules” and connection to criminal Justice. But with today’s ruling on prayer, the United States is being toppled from its constitutional foundation of prudent rules and common sense.

It is a heartache.

Expand full comment

Go here and find out about "prophylactic rules"

https://tcinla757.substack.com/p/its-been-a-helluva-week-and-there

Expand full comment

Thanks TC.

Expand full comment

From article: "In using the power of the federal government to guarantee “the equal protection of the laws,” it made sure that a small pool of voters couldn’t strip rights from their neighbors. It is this effort today’s Supreme Court is gutting."

We already have a "small pool of voters" - a minority aka the Senate - stripping away our rights. Now we have a cabal of religious fanatics, six misogynists drunk on power and fueled by hatred and hubris, stripping away our rights. And as you have listed the laundry list of their planned assault, let us not forget that John Cornyn has tweeted an intent to go after Brown v Board of Education. There is no end to their assault on this democracy and the freedoms of our people. None.

Expand full comment

The Cornyn tweet was at first shocking. Then I realized he did us a favor — once and for all he stripped off the facade to reveal the monsters besieging the nation. In other words, the shi*t got REAL.

Expand full comment

Thank you for this report, TC.

Expand full comment

And today they are narrowing the separation between church and state......using the high school football field.

Expand full comment

Everybody knows the "jockstraps" need extra "moral edumacation." Most of them also need brains.

Expand full comment

In the 1800s and now, despite the lofty language, it's about nothing more than seizing raw power to make money and subjugate people. Are we in the midst of a coup masquerading as the highest court merely do its job?

Expand full comment

⌛️🤯

Expand full comment