I couldn't agree more Annie. They've given Maggie Haberman and Paul Krugman long leashes to bash CFDT and their bizarro economic policies and Michelle Goldberg is left leaning otherwise they love them some CFDT and bash Biden every chance they get.
We're all doing the same thing. We're all make assumptions and then we draw a conclusion. And then we take one of two paths. The wise path is to recognize that our assumptions are potentially erroneous but testable, which is why they must be stated. The other path is to jump to the conclusion that "my conclusion is right, and anyone who disagrees with me is wrong." The former are sane, and the latter deserved to be mocked.
Anyone knowing nothing about what is going on other than what is documented in this thread, which includes a lot of very specific information, would find Annie's comment to be in harmony with that information. I don't know what your assumptions are. Maybe they're legitimate. If so, add them to the record. But your conclusion -- that it was Annie making a mock-worthy comment -- conflicts with that information.
Translation: With respect, unintended disrespect is still disrespectful, and if you're looking for someone to mock, consider looking in the mirror.
Thank you for the thoughtful observation, with which I can mostly agree. What is very mockable is the opine that the NYSlimes has never supported Biden. If the mockee finds that disrespectful, perhaps that should prompt a re-examination of the opinion.
The NYT has never supported President Biden.
I couldn't agree more Annie. They've given Maggie Haberman and Paul Krugman long leashes to bash CFDT and their bizarro economic policies and Michelle Goldberg is left leaning otherwise they love them some CFDT and bash Biden every chance they get.
?? CFDT is a new acronym for me. Please define. Thanks
Convicted Felon Donald Trump
Thanks for that. This prompts another acronym: CFHB - Convicted Felon Hunter Biden.
???? What stone have you been living under these past few years?
Please donтАЩt be disrespectful.
Insane comments deserve to be mocked. Any disrespect unintended.
We're all doing the same thing. We're all make assumptions and then we draw a conclusion. And then we take one of two paths. The wise path is to recognize that our assumptions are potentially erroneous but testable, which is why they must be stated. The other path is to jump to the conclusion that "my conclusion is right, and anyone who disagrees with me is wrong." The former are sane, and the latter deserved to be mocked.
Anyone knowing nothing about what is going on other than what is documented in this thread, which includes a lot of very specific information, would find Annie's comment to be in harmony with that information. I don't know what your assumptions are. Maybe they're legitimate. If so, add them to the record. But your conclusion -- that it was Annie making a mock-worthy comment -- conflicts with that information.
Translation: With respect, unintended disrespect is still disrespectful, and if you're looking for someone to mock, consider looking in the mirror.
Thank you for the thoughtful observation, with which I can mostly agree. What is very mockable is the opine that the NYSlimes has never supported Biden. If the mockee finds that disrespectful, perhaps that should prompt a re-examination of the opinion.