778 Comments
⭠ Return to thread

I now think Kamala has wrapped together the themes of Freedom, Justice, and Joy into a delicious, effective package. The Joy part is crucial to motivating folks. And it makes her laughter, which Trump and other right-wingers like to mock, into a cathartic release for all of us. Genius. She's already made Trump and Vance look like the small, petty people they are. The wanna-be Emperors have no clothes, and she's made that manifestly clear. Let's laugh together with Kamala all the way to the ballot box, and on to the White House!

Expand full comment

Let's hope the enthusiasm spreads to become a Blue Wave.

Let's hope it grows so we re-take control of the House and hold the Senate!

Up and down the enire ballot - VOTE BLUE !!

Expand full comment

A distinct possibility. President Biden was effective in cobbling together a coalition of herding cats with strongly willed segments. Bringing joy and laughter to the campaign may work to unify the Party and build on that coalition.

Expand full comment

Joy and laughter is something we haven't seen for a long time.

Expand full comment

Yeah, for sure. Her laugh is infectious. President Trump would like to laugh but the botox will not let him.

Expand full comment

I have read--I think in Mary Trump's book--that dear ol' Dad, Fred, Sr., told Donald that laughing makes a person vulnerable and he, Donald, should NEVER laugh. Ol' Dad was a grim mentor. Clearly, iddle Donnie--attempting to please his father, perhaps get some approval and possibly even affection, took that to heart.*

Expand full comment

*and now he has no heart; no love, no compassion, no empathy for anyone other than himself.

Expand full comment

You know what else tRump took to heart? Roy Cohn's lessons:

#1: All publicity is good regardless of how negative it is.

#2: When attacked attacked back harder.

When sued counter sue for more.

#3: NEVER apologize.

#4: Whatever happens claim victory.

#5: You do not have to believe what you say.

Expand full comment

Fred Sr's implicit message was that creating trusting relationships makes a person vulnerable, and it does. When you trust, you make yourself vulnerable to betrayal. But the person that does not trust is more vulnerable because they end up living in a reality that exists only in their own mind.

Expand full comment

I noticed that Barron never smiles. Neither does Melania. I thought that was because they are unhappy in their situation, but maybe they're just going by the trump rule. Sad. Sad. Sad.

Expand full comment

This always makes me think of this quotation from The Merchant of Venice—just substitute laughter for music: "“The man that hath no music in himself, Nor is not moved with concord of sweet sounds, Is fit for treasons, stratagems, and spoils; The motions of his spirit are dull as night, And his affections dark as Erebus. Let no such man be trusted."

Expand full comment

Not to laugh makes one vulnerable? Where does crap like that come from?

Expand full comment

CFDTs grin even scares Chuckie. Talk about creepy.😱

Expand full comment

And Kamala says "bring it on" with a knowing confident laugh... she's a gladiator...

Expand full comment

Dear old Dad was a right wing extremist John Bircher.. The John Birch Society was the most right wing pro guns extremist group of its time.. They opposed the Civil Rights Movement and the Equal Rights for Women Movement...so 'Dad' was more than a grim mentor. And Donald was infected

Expand full comment

Poor old man. (How do you laugh with a whine? I don't want to know.)

Expand full comment

I don't know Anne-Louise. I've laugher with a wine plenty of times. /S

Expand full comment

Anne-Louise....now that is an excellent question. It would be some creepy sound like that of classic villains.

Expand full comment

I’ll bet he has never laughed, except when he has caused misery for someone,,.

Expand full comment

JD, spot on.

Expand full comment

"Former" president, that is.

Expand full comment

The Botox didn't work

Expand full comment

His personality won't let him.

Expand full comment

🤣🤣🤣🤣

Expand full comment

Ned, he certainly didn’t get his money’s worth!

Expand full comment

Ooo that’s too bad….

Expand full comment

"I’ve seen the Promised Land. I may not get there with you. But I want you to know tonight, that we, as a people, will get to the Promised Land." MLK

Expand full comment

Hope:

You are experiencing one of the best economies the nation ever had. When the pandemic took hold of us, our livelihoods, our families, the Biden administration provided the means to survive it with funding and programs. You were in a better place due to him though not the one Martin Luther King talked about. Biden worked for everyone and not just the one-percenters as trump did in 2017.

Basically, we trashed a good person till he finally gave up. I saw the weariness in him then and after he experienced the mean verbalization and critique centered on his age and foibles. Old and still a warrior who recognizes a leader when I see one.

I do not know what Kamala will bring to the economy. I can tell you one thing, "there can be no compromise on the 2017 tax break." It must be ended otherwise, otherwise the next generation will suffer the most. This was on Biden's list of "to be accomplished." It is a matter of will power and whether Kamala has the strength and the political know how to accomplish it without sacrificing other programs.

I do not mean to preach to you alone. The job was half done and we still have a long way to go to correct the damage done in the past by trump and Republicans.

"They still Shoot Horses, don't they?"

Expand full comment

Bill, have I given you the wrong impression? The Biden administration was nothing short of marvelous. Yes, he needs to be given more credit, and perhaps with time, he will. Bill, I am of the opinion that something happened to Biden, perhaps a small stroke or the onset of one of the types of dementia. The debate was shocking, and he never fully regained his 'center'. That's nothing to be ashamed of. As an elderly person who still thinks I have some fire in me, I also see inexorable changes. It happens. I feared that he could not finish another four years.

As for Kamala, I couldn't be more pleased. The MAGAS are racists and misogynists, and who to answer to them is better than a black woman? Therein lies my joy. I continue to respect Joe, and I hope that his successor will continue his Keynesian economics, his international accomplishments, and his domestic support. I would like to see some muscle put into the Gaza peace initiatives, though.

Expand full comment

Beautiful reminder of another era and a superb leader…

Expand full comment

How often have you ever seen tRump laugh?

Expand full comment

Neither seen nor heard. There's a collection of pictures of him with dentures bared for the cameras, but as his narrowed eyes are never lit by a kindly emotion, there's no suggestion of laughter as we know it.

Expand full comment

Did see a pic where he smiled with Epstein. I’d hate to know what they were smiling about.

Expand full comment

I have seen ONE picture in which he seemed genuinely just... happy. It was a picture of him with a young grandchild in the White House. Given his stated attitude towards young children, I presume the happiness was engendered by an announcement that it was time for the child to leave.

Expand full comment

Harvey, he laughed with delight when the church crowd he was speaking to echoed in unison, his "bull s__"

comment. He turned around to laugh whole at the podium, and you could see that he was so pleased with his "amazing" sense of humor."

Disgusting,

Expand full comment

Not even smile. Trained out of him in early childhood or at one of the ‘military’ academies he was sent to …?

Expand full comment

Of course it will. This reminds me of when president Obama ran for president. Remember how jubilant people felt back then? I believe people feel the same way with Kamala.

Expand full comment

Let's hope the cats aren't hostages of lonely single women! I'd hate to see fur babies take the place of the human babies we girls ought to be producing. I'm just a dumb chick, but even I know I should be in the kitchen, barefoot and silent, belly out to here with quints on the way.

Expand full comment

With these initial inklings of joy and happiness, I’m thinking that this just might be able to bring into play something that I thought would likely not have been possible for a very long time to come … the possibilities of a Democratic supermajority in both the House and the Senate, if Harris’ coattails are - indeed - sufficiently long … Well, one can dream - can’t we?

Expand full comment

Not impossible! The first order of business is deep cleaning the Supreme Court.

Expand full comment

Hope, I like your optimism … let’s see what’s happening during and after the Democratic Convention in a few weeks … Hopefully, the enthusiasm and excitement can continue and propel the Party to landslide victories in the House, the Senate and trouncing idiot trump to elect our country’s first female (woman) into the role of POTUS, allowing her and her family to occupy White House! [Also see Peggy Noonan’s most recent Wall Street Journal opinion - https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-kamala-harris-surprise-i-thought-she-couldnt-beat-trump-but-now-think-she-could-fbdcaebc?st=bjg64znui358ae2&reflink=article_copyURL_share].

We have passed the time for the SILENT MAJORITY to speak!

Expand full comment

I'm dreaming that right along with you. Wouldn't it be marvelous! I believe if that happens the Republican party would be sunk. They would no longer be able to scare the mass of voters with "the Dems..." once those voters experienced their and their loved ones lives getting better and safer.

Expand full comment

Let’s help her build this coalition!

Expand full comment

Whether one is religious or not, I think we all - okay, almost all - can agree that an AMEN may just be an appropriate response sung by the chorus to that!!! OH, and I feel that the size of the chorus or choir is growing!

Expand full comment

Yes! Building on the “Up & Down the ballot” Election ~ Dream Out Loud! ~ Let’s ALL do this ! Engage people you already know, even on the perimeter of your busy life! Invite them to tell you what their experience is of the election to date !

Remind friends and relatives in mail-in ballot counties to follow through with voting as soon as possible when their ballot appears in their mailbox! And sign the Outside of the ballot envelope before mailing it back.

Let’s sing along with Kamala 🎶🩷

Expand full comment

VOTE BLUE!

The Democratic party is reforming itself. We are hearing the first cries of a rebirth - lusty but a new and tender entity. Let's not poison it with a Republican or No Labels veep pick - it would stop our momentum dead. It would damn the Democratic party. It would sow disunity. Not least by validating the specious 'duopoly' rhetoric used to split the opposition vote and suppress the Democratic vote.

The Democratic party is returning to its roots and leafing out in a new generation. Republicans can follow our example. The best thing responsible Republicans can do is vote Democratic to defeat MAGA and then they can have an 8 year time out to reform the GOP.

Expand full comment

I have a feeling that the GOP is no longer salvageable by the common voter. When moneyed interests took it in hand to mold it into a trump vehicle, mainly so they could push their own corporate-friendly, anti-democracy agenda, they stained the name of Republican for the political landscape. I don’t know how you come back from that when money made it and still owns it. I have a feeling that the party will have to crumble further by having more voters leaving it over time before it will be replaced with a more conservative vision again, maybe a new party or just a new name. My point being, the owners of the party are still making grift from it. They won’t let it go until it is an empty, used up shell on the ground. The smarter republicans have already left. They just need a more moderate party to join (might be democrats for now but we know that won’t last long,) I wish them luck. I happen to believe we need both sets of ideals working together in moderation for the best overall results for America. We’re way too off balance right now. And for the immediate future that means democrats HAVE to win.

Expand full comment

I think it is likely that after being soundly defeated on November 5th, the "never Trumpers" will come out of the woodwork with their post mortem autopsy of a political party gone mad and bad.

I agree that the name Republican may not be salvageable. Perhaps a new party called the New Conservatives will be formed. They could gain some traction IF they accepted human responsibility for the Climate Catastrophe, didn't question the integrity of our elections and respected women's reproductive freedom and rights. Add in eschewing primitive bible thumping nonsense that throws a woman back in the kitchen and stops demonizing all "others" - like hard working, law abiding immigrants. A new party could emerge, but...

The GOP has become so aligned with lying, maligning and hating - it really should be buried with communism and fascism.

There IS a need for political balance and dialog to arrive at compromises and helpful legislation. But realistically, this already exists within the Democratic Party.

And what would a new center right party stand for? A strong defense against Russia (like the old GOP) - Dems own that. Sound fiscal policy that reduces the growth of federal deficits - Dems are doing that now. American energy independence? Already done!

So your point about balance is well taken. I just think the GOP has given all their reasonable positions away to the Dems.

Expand full comment

You're correct,Bill. I personally am fiscally conservative but socially liberal. That means I'm right in the middle of the political spectrum. I've not changed much, but Republicans' tide has retreated from the shore along which I'm walking, and the Democratic tide has come in. The Democratic waves are a little rough, but I'm learning to surf.

Expand full comment

They had a post mortem in 2012. And became what they are today. The old guard is gone, gone, gone. Not even a syllable from any Bush, but guess that’s a plus.

Expand full comment

What about the people who populate The Lincoln Project? They seem like good Republicans!

Expand full comment

Well said, Bill. Thank you!

Expand full comment

I do wonder if the name will disappear as quickly as the Whig name disappeared after Lincoln switched from Whig to Republican.

Expand full comment

May they go the way of the Whig Party!

Expand full comment

The Democratic Party is already a large coalition.

Expand full comment

… and expanding with new [voters] party registrations and those who will be coming alone with us like the “never trumpers” from all parties and non-party affiliations!

Expand full comment

Couldn’t agree more, yet there are those who want more blather instead of unity.

Expand full comment

They don't want unity, they want to rule. They will have to break free of the P2025 screed and I don't see that happening.

Expand full comment

I was talking Dem or those who claim to be. The Dems need unity as much as they/we ever have. Not a time for more snipping with each other. You are right about P2025. They will have that hanging around Repub necks like an albatross. What better place.

Expand full comment

Your imagery is inspiring and replenishing. May our efforts bear fruit and nourish others.

Expand full comment

Can the Republican party grow up in 8 years? I was insufficiently mature when I was 10 and sufficiently mature when I was 18, so that sounds about right.

Expand full comment

@ Gary Mengel. To make a blue wave, register more Democrats.

https://www.fieldteam6.org/

Expand full comment

The fact that the Republicans in the House have postponed votes on appropriation bills until they return to Washington in September, with a budget that is supposed to go into effect October 1, speaks volumes.

Expand full comment

I think that Putin pays more, who doubts their allegiance

Expand full comment

Running scared! They know they've lost the narrative!

Expand full comment

A blue rinse! "Wash him out, dry him out, cancel him and let him go, yay sister!"

Expand full comment

Love it! I haven't thought of that song in decades, and it certainly fits right now!

Expand full comment

Some good news; check this out.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ofHDCSWUuKk

Expand full comment

Thanks for the link, Ned. It was a really interesting youtube. For those who don't have the time to watch, the narrator makes the excellent point that all the new voters registering in recent weeks/months are not included in any data base for polling purposes. Their opinions and voting preferences are not a part of any poll we are seeing. So, when we wonder (as I have) how the race between Trump and Harris could continue to be so close....this is one reason! One more reason to ignore polls!!

Expand full comment

The NYT polls have been outed as grossly over-sampling traditionally Republican demographics, so I'm assuming Harris now has a solid lead.

Expand full comment

Polls… a basis for mor blather from the talking heads!

Expand full comment

Yup! Fueled by the need to have someone talking for 24 hours/day!!

Expand full comment

I've taken to referring to that as "MOAR BLATHER" which is something I picked up from a weird meme where "moar" means even more than "more" does.

Expand full comment

The increase, according to Beau's statements, is still only 38,000 new voters. Many more are needed.

Expand full comment

Taylor and Beyonce can do that in an hour -- and they will.

Expand full comment

Beau's thoughts are my thoughts exactly. And, it gives me room to breathe.

Expand full comment

And, register more Independents. Thanks.

Expand full comment

@ Dale Ogg. Not when our data shows they trend MAGA.

Expand full comment

I went back to being Independent, simply because it makes it a lot easier to get others to at least register and lean left when they can't bring themselves to totally switch sides.

I believe it also gets them away from voting straight tickets and helps bring down ballot victories where possible.

Like Willie Velasquez, with SVREP that switched to non-partisan education after failing to get as many registered for partisan entities, I believe you get better results far more often, and results that keep on getting them to pay attention to their real and better informed interests.

P.S. See https://www.sos.ca.gov/administration/news-releases-and-advisories/2019-news-releases-and-advisories/new-report-california-voter-registration-highest-percentage-eligible-voters-registered-67-years

80.65% of eligible voters registered in 2019, highest percentage since 1952 and 10.45% more than 2016.

California lost 4.04% of Republicans as No Party Preference increased 2.74% between 2016 and 2019.

2019 (NPP goes ahead of GOP registered voters):

5,435,431 No Party Preference (Independents)

4,793,833 Republicans

2016:

4,767,259 Republicans

4,141,860 No Party Preference

Expand full comment

Amen, Brother Gary!

Expand full comment

James Carville warned the Democrats to not take our eye off the prize of winning in November. He said the time to celebrate Kamala needs to be over quickly and get back to work fighting off the Republicans lies.

Why is no one attacking Trump for the 143 criminals he pardoned on January 20, 2021.

Included in this list are murderers and fraudsters and even a rapist or two.

Of note, are the 10 convicted felons that defrauded Medicare/Medicaid of over $1.5 billion. And he let a few of them out of prison so that can screw us all over again.

https://www.businessinsider.in/thelife/news/conservative-beauty-fans-are-boycotting-sephora-after-the-retailer-cut-ties-with-a-pro-trump-influencer/articleshow/80654874.cms

There were actually 237 he granted clemency or a pardon to between 2017 and 2021.

And he's already promised pardons to several hundred more if he's elected.

The party of law and order? Not a chance.

Expand full comment

Good points, and you ask some interesting questions.

Expand full comment

That would be terrific, send all the MAGAts packing. Both houses could give the majority the power to get what we want for a change. Making sure we all do everything we can to win.

Expand full comment

💙💙💙💙💙💙💙💙💙💙💙💙💙

Expand full comment

With all those donations pouring in that should give the people a indication how determined they are to win this election.

Expand full comment

MALA: Make America Laugh Again.

Love it!!!

Expand full comment

Veronica, how about MAHA: Make America Happy Again?

Expand full comment

Mary, I saw someone on Threads yesterday offer up MANA: Make America Nice Again.

Expand full comment

Or MANNA ...

MANNA from Heaven ...

Food to eat in the Wilderness

Expand full comment

MAJA - Make America Joyful Again

Expand full comment

Sophie, great idea!

Expand full comment

How about Keep America Moving And Laugh Again or KAMALA

Expand full comment

Montana, I love it!

Expand full comment

Careful. Mala means “bad” in Spanish.

Expand full comment

In Sanskrit, it means "garland" and is the name for a string of beads used like a rosary to steady the mind.

Expand full comment

MALA is not mala, it is an KAMALA, Make America Laugh Again🤣😂

Expand full comment

KAM-ALA

Come Along ...

"We ain't going Back"

Expand full comment

Thank you Kathy!

Expand full comment

Smart point!

Expand full comment

Si Kathy, "MALA" no es bueno.

Expand full comment

But the magas don’t know any other language!

Expand full comment

HAHAHA: THE HISPANIC ONES DO, SOMË

Expand full comment

Her name is Kamala! Despite the fact that many of us might be fluent in Spanish, to the best of my knowledge, the USA continues to be an English speaking country. Changing the letters changes the mean.

Considering that the scurge has called Ms. Harris's laughter " cackle" , which gets

under Trump's skin, I am sticking with "MAKE AMERICA Laugh Again!". My purpose is to turn sadness and depression into joyful laughter. Of course each reader may come uo with

their own word! There are many possibilities.

Kamala could be "bad" in a winning way. Bad for Project

2025 and trump's twisted ambitions..

Expand full comment

I simply thought it prudent to point out that if one wishes to create an effective acronym, one might wish to consider that it happens to carry a negative connotation (and it’s the feminine form, to boot!) to over half a billion Spanish speakers throughout the world. And POTUS surely plays on a world stage. Of course, you are free to create whatever acronym you like, but If you wonder what prompted my original comment, you might want to look into how GM’s sales of their Chevy Nova fared in Spanish-speaking markets. Just trying to be helpful.

Expand full comment

Isn't the Spanish word for bad mal? Not mala?

Expand full comment

Mal….before a noun….a bad year….un mal año…..mala is feminine form….bad person….una persona mala

Using MALA with KAMALA could work…….but memes can backfire…we have to be careful!

Sorry about Spanish lesson….😔

Expand full comment

For a bad woman: MALA, For a bad man: MALO. PLURAL: ADD AN "S

MAL means badly or poorly. Example: "El

"@#€% " se porta mal."

The (explitive) behaves poorly.

Expand full comment

Mala is the feminine form; mal, mala.

Expand full comment

🤣🤣🤣

Expand full comment

Good point

Expand full comment

Rare are the days that I wake up, read the news, and start grinning from ear to ear. Today is one of those days. :) :)

Expand full comment

Bravo! I watch France 24 in Vietnam, in English. They are saying Kamala has energiized the party, as weii of some undecided voters. Her Presidential candidacy is being seen globally as a breath of fresh air. America is on fire!

Expand full comment

Laughter is the best medicine. ❤️

Expand full comment

That works perfectly with her name Ka-MALA! 🥰❤️👍

Expand full comment

We are putting the MALA in KAMALA!

Expand full comment

Love it. MALA

Expand full comment

MAJA - Make America Joyful Again

Expand full comment

Make America Just (as in Justice) Again?

Expand full comment

Brilliant!

Expand full comment

TikTok is going wild, with absolutely hilarious and rapid-speed responses to MAGA attacks on Kamala. These are the young voters we kept moaning about needing to activate, and lo and behold — they activated themselves. I'm committing time daily to amplifying them: lliking, reposting and thanking these new leaders.

Expand full comment

As the mud-slinging campaign against VP Kamala will be 24/7 until Nov 5, wanted to share with readers Jay Kuo’s post on how to counter attacks and blunt assaults.

https://open.substack.com/pub/thinkbigpicture/p/kamala-harris-racist-misogynistic-attacks?r=fqsxl&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=email

😂 Make America Laugh Again😂

Expand full comment

Thanks for the link, Kathy.

Expand full comment

@ Alexandria. Channel Beyonce and Taylor Swift. Link them to register. https://voterizer.org/

Expand full comment

Alexandra, I supported Kamala's shift to the frontrunner on the ticket post-debate, bellieving that her energy enthusiasm would inspire all of us, but especially women and young voters. She has done that beyond my imagination! Heather started this Letter using the word "momentum"; I would call it "WO-MEN-tum".

I've said this elsewhere, and I'll say it again and again: the attacks are coming at her, and will increase in vitriol and anger, and danger. I hope the Secret Service is up to the task of protecting her. The MAGA cult is well-aware that she is on a path to victory, and their orange idol can't beat her fair and square.

Expand full comment

Love the “WO- MEN-tum” and all you had to do was turn the M upside down.

Expand full comment

The Independent makes a point about Taylor Swift and "cat ladies"

https://www.independent.co.uk/voices/kamala-childless-cat-lady-taylor-swift-vance-b2586415.html

Expand full comment

Thank you Alexandra for that sharp focus. 🎯 Just annotating HCR's Paragraph 3, Vote.org added the fact that 83% of the newly registered 40,000 Voters are between the ages of 18 to 34!

Vote.org's Andrea Hailey posted that the new record of 40K newly registered voters exceeds the prior record when 34,000 young fans registered to vote upon the lead from you know 🎶who🎶.

101 Days to the November election. Time to play Taylor's 'Only the Young' music video again.

Expand full comment

Yes, and Trump and Vance are absolutely humorless. Kamala Harris' exuberant humor and social ease make her opponents seem to lack a human dimension. And with Kamala's ease, genuineness, honesty and especially her free spirit that's on display, she's bridged the generation gap with young voters. The contrast could not be clearer: with the daily, open display of her character and warmth she embodies her beliefs — as do Trump and Vance embody theirs with the warmth of a space rock.

Expand full comment

"Joy is a [wo]man's passage from a lesser to a greater perfection."

-Spinoza

Expand full comment

I'm really curious as to what will happen now... I'm still convinced that if the Democrats win the vote, the Supreme Court will declare the election fraudulent (without any proof, but they don't care) and will simply rule that the presidency be handed to Trump. That's what they are planning to do, that's what they are paid to do.

But what if... What if the momentum of Kamala's campaign is so great, and so overwhelming that the corrupt judges won't _dare_ to dismiss the vote? With this kind of enthusiasm, and a fair election saying Kamala won, if they simply dismiss it, won't the American people explode in a collective "what the actual FLYING f*ck did you do there??" If this would be, they will have to choose between letting their wealthy donors down, or risking the wrath of the American people...

Expand full comment

President Biden is still in charge until the oath is given in January to the President Elect. He has the power to stop the court's intervention until then. He has the power to declare martial law if the court tried to illegally declare the orange traitor the winner. And now that the stupid decision has given the President immunity, (which should be struck down with a Constitutional amendment) he has more power than a President should, and can be used in this case to prevent the right wing SCJ from their own personal coup.

Expand full comment

Good to know Biden can overrule a SCOTUS coup, but did they give all presidents immunity, or wasn't it that they give themselves the ability to decide on immunity depending on whether they like the current POTUS?

Expand full comment

Who knows how this ridiculous ruling would be applied by a court that thinks it's duties are to twist the Constitution instead of interpreting the law.

Expand full comment

The latter, James.

Expand full comment

Yes, the latter, James. They hold themselves as the final arbiters as to what immunities a president may have. All the for the right favours and bribes, of course, which - as they themselves ruled, too - may now be limitless.

Expand full comment

Not entirely. The SCOTUS reserved the right for themselves to judge whether a president has immunity in a given case or not. Your can bet your left kidney, and your right, that they would give Trump all the leeway he would want, and they will of course stop anything that Biden wants to try.

Expand full comment

Dutch Mike, even I am not so cynical to believe this, as I'm sure election law lawyers such as Elias and Hasen are anticipating and preparing for all possibilities of malfeasance. There is plenty of other things to worry about -- my biggest fear is an attempt on Harris's life, or on that of her veep choice, or...

Expand full comment

Cynical? Me? As JD Chilcutt said below, the SCOTUS have proved that they have no scruples pushing the christian-nationalist agenda. They threw Roe vs Wade of the window without any repercussions, they have declared themselves the final arbiters of any would-be dictator, plus: they ruled that they can be bribed for infinite amounts of money without having to declare anything. That's BEYOND cynical: that's outright corruption, fascist-regime-style. They have been testing the waters, and found them just fine.

Expand full comment

Ned, I agree that the corruption of several SCOTUS justices knows no bounds. I'm only saying that, to believe your premise is to believe that voting won't matter, as it will be up to them. I still believe we have a functioning, though wobbly, system of justice in the U.S. and that the eventual vote count (damned Electoral College) will stand the stress of appeals (remember, CF45 lost over 60 lawsuits contesting the counts or slates of electors, and only won one small technicality which was benign.) But we shall see -- let's hope I'm right and you're wrong.

Expand full comment

"Ned"? ;)

Well, don't get me wrong, I really _do_ that _I_ am wrong and you are right. I'm just saying that now that Harris runs for president, these problems aren't solved all of a sudden.

And voting still matters, if only to show that it's NOT the majority of American people who stand behind Trump, as he is so fond of imagining. If only just to see him exploding with anger because he absolutely cannot stand losing, whichever game he's playing.

But don't be surprised when it plays out the way I laid it out: as you said, the corruption of several SCOTUS justices knows no bounds, and they are in the majority now. Just as Moscow Mitch McConnell intended... Who knows what prizes their rich donors promised them for doing this.

Expand full comment

Sorry, Dutch!!! Mea culpa.

Expand full comment

Real concern. They have proved that they have no scruples

Expand full comment

My sentiments exactly.

Expand full comment

I think my favorite story of the past several days is Joe Biden calling into a Kamala event to tell her,I’m watching you kid, I love you.” Kamala says right back. “ I love you Joe.” Can you imagine anything like this coming out of the mouth of the malignant narcissist? Watch here https://youtu.be/S167d5GuJ0I?si=hxqZ9ek3-yxRs0Rb

Expand full comment

We have to turn that laughter against Trump. Maybe the Lincoln Project could do a video of Trump's flubs and weird locutions interspersed with videos of Harris laughing as though at him? It would drive him up a wall.

Expand full comment

Can’t Dems do their own video. Love Lincoln Project, but where are our creative types

Expand full comment

I would love to see that!

Expand full comment

What interests me is the speculation for the V.P. candidate. Perhaps leaving that to an open convention would dispel all of the flying scheiße of the Democrats forcing President Biden to retire and rigging things.

My possibilities would include, in order of preference:

Governor Andy Beshear (D-KY)

Former Senator Jeff Flake (R-AZ)

Former Representative Ken Buck (R-CO)

Governor Gretchen Witmer (D-MI)

Representative Jared Moskowitz (D-FL)

Former Representative Liz Cheney (R-WY)

Representative Deborah Ross (D-N.C.)

Former Representative Adam Kinzinger (R-IL)

Expand full comment

No, absolutely hell no to anyone with an r.

Even though I admire their push back against the donvict, their voting record says otherwise. Cheney 93% and Kinzinger 98%.

This needs to be straight Democratic ticket.

I like Beshear.

Expand full comment

Hell no to an R is right.

Expand full comment

And given their voting records, why help Rs gain more credibility for a run at the presidency? Why act as though their voting records aren't so bad that they could be second in line? That would embolden Rs to resist progressive legislation.

Expand full comment

The two "R" possibilities you mention have another task before them: They MUST be the foundation of a new focus in today's RepubliKan party, not to join our party. I had forgotten about Jeff Flake; that would be a good running mate. I don't want either Arizona or Florida to lose a democrat; I believe in both those states, the Governor appoints the successor. If I lived in Kentucky I'd be furious if Beshear were selected.

Expand full comment

Agreed, Beth. But I'm unsure of Bashear -- isn't it better to keep him in Kentucky?

Expand full comment

My point as well, Doug.

Expand full comment

Bipartisanship is always nice. And maybe someday we will have a more muted 2 party system in this Country. We need to be Democratic Party strong. The trump campaign would eat us alive if we had a Republican on the Democratic ticket.

Expand full comment

Josh Shapiro from PA

Expand full comment

THE best candidate is Roy Cooper, governor of NC! However, the lt Gov is a rabid maga who would be acting Governor if Roy left the state to campaign! Roy’s my choice but he won’t leave the state to the Lt Gov who ‘admonishes women who were raped to you ‘should keep your skirt down ‘, or his ‘some people need killing’ comment!

Expand full comment

Gotta think about the future, Louis. I like Cooper, but he's I think 67 years old. In 8 years he's 75, and we are right back to where we were with an older candidate.

Nope -- Mark Kelly is Kamala's age and makes a lot of sense. Shapiro is even younger (but may have trouble with pro-Palestine Arab-Americans. There are others as well. I trust Kamala and her advisors will name someone she can work with and help the ticket.

Expand full comment

I think Roy Cooper is in his late 60s. That means in 8 years he will be an elderly candidate for President. That’s going in the wrong direction.

Expand full comment

With due respect, Ned, let's settle this before the convention, especially given the Dems' previous statements that it will be done by or before August 7, due to Ohio Republicans' shenanigans with official ballots. Let's keep the momentum going and name a veep in the next week or so.

Expand full comment

I disagree. Many people I know outside of this forum believe the Democratic Party tips the scales. This open convention would answer that.

Expand full comment

Ned, first off I'm no fan of the DNC --period. That said, do you think they'd have no say at an open convention? They run the show. What Kamala has done -- since Sunday -- is to raise over a quarter billion dollars for her campaign. That kind of money talks. An open convention will potentially open wounds, while we need to continue uniting. The short list of candidates floated here and elsewhere contains names that most folks would support. Now, who knows? Maybe she chooses a dark horse. But it should ultimately be her choice -- it's her campaign, and her money. Anyway, cheers!

Expand full comment

I stand corrected. The open convention, if it occurred, took place in 1956. As stated before, it was for selecting a vice presidential candidate. With Dixiecrats, urban East-West Coast Democrats, More liberal plains states Democrats, union Democrats in what is now the rust belt, my sense is the divisions were clearer then.

Expand full comment

Roy Cooper

Expand full comment

Laugh and dance.... and work to save America.

Expand full comment

Linda H

You put a big smile on my face this morning! Thank you and thanks to Heather.

Expand full comment

It was … interesting watching James Carville’s temperance warnings in his earliest comments (during Ari Melber’s program yesterday on MSNBC) about the excitement being generated by the Harris entrée into the presidential race - only to later have him offer an almost opposite feelings and optimistic comments after watching and hearing Harris’ statements immediately following her meeting with Netanyahu.

Expand full comment

Watching Kamala deal with Netanyahu is like watching a wise parent helping an immature child recognize that it's time to grow up. As hard as it is to teach an old dog new tricks, I'd be surprised if her message to him didn't hit the mark.

Expand full comment

"Freedom, Justice, and Joy" gives me chills. What a great phrase, Linda!! Perhaps the Dems should use that as a marketing slogan?!

Expand full comment

Indeed!

Expand full comment

Is it just me, or do you feel like you can breathe again? Since trump came down the escalator, I have not felt this ability to get air deep into my lungs. That has changed in the past few days.

Expand full comment

I love this comment so much - bring on the joy! So happy to see Kamala's focus on freedom as well.

Expand full comment