Discussion about this post

User's avatar
J L Graham's avatar

Last March. Mitt Romney offered this plan to shore up tax cuts for the wealthy:

"In comments to the Senate budget committee on Wednesday, the Republican senator from Utah said that the spiraling costs of retirement programs had to be tackled to bring national debt under control. Romney raised the politically controversial idea of cutting benefits, but only for younger generations before they reach retirement age.

“ 'For younger people coming along, we got to be able to find a way to balance these programs or we’re gonna find ourselves in a heap of trouble,' he said. He added that he was not in favour of raising taxes as a way of balancing the books, but was open to adjusting “long-term benefits not for current retirees”.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2022/mar/31/mitt-romney-cut-back-retirement-benefits-younger-americans

Tax cuts for and bailouts for the wealthy, austerity for you. Should be their campaign slogan.

Expand full comment
Kerry H Pechter's avatar

Is Social Security on or off the budget? Why do you call it an expense if it is funded by a dedicated tax... and remains pre-funded even today by some $2 trillion? Until just a couple of years ago, it was a net revenue source for the Treasury. I protest the characterisation of Social Security as an expense, or FICA as a tax. The payroll tax is a social insurance premium that buys a life-contingent pension with a spousal benefit. To call it an expense is to hand a weapon unnecessarily to Congressional allies of Wall Street, which is eager to get its hands on the payroll tax.

Expand full comment
464 more comments...

No posts