Why are we ( I mean a collective we) so apathetic that DT will not be held accountable? Reading the litany of his transgressions is exhausting -- I'm a lifelong DEM and sometimes in the attempt to "move on" we are not as aggressive as we need to be --- somehow, I feel with Kamla as VP and a former prosecutor, we may have the perfect per…
Why are we ( I mean a collective we) so apathetic that DT will not be held accountable? Reading the litany of his transgressions is exhausting -- I'm a lifelong DEM and sometimes in the attempt to "move on" we are not as aggressive as we need to be --- somehow, I feel with Kamla as VP and a former prosecutor, we may have the perfect person to see that DT get his proper justice. --- "a bald-faced, bold abuse of power" --- It will not serve us to let by gones be bygones -- if we do so, then DT can stand in the middle of 5th avenue and shoot anyone he pleases without consequences. The Repubs think they are upholding the law and know the constitution but are subverting everything for personal gain. The latest appointments to the Supreme Court states they are constitutionist (originalist) -- what does that mean for the rule of law?
I say we give Brad Raffesnsperger man of the year for his integrity.
An aside - I've been gifting memberships to this forum --wish I could do so for the Trump base too.
Thank you Dr. HCR and all the enlightened and thoughtful readers here whom I continue to learn and discern with.
Why are we ( I mean a collective we) so apathetic that DT will not be held accountable? Reading the litany of his transgressions is exhausting -- I'm a lifelong DEM and sometimes in the attempt to "move on" we are not as aggressive as we need to be --- somehow, I feel with Kamla as VP and a former prosecutor, we may have the perfect person to see that DT get his proper justice. --- "a bald-faced, bold abuse of power" --- It will not serve us to let by gones be bygones -- if we do so, then DT can stand in the middle of 5th avenue and shoot anyone he pleases without consequences. The Repubs think they are upholding the law and know the constitution but are subverting everything for personal gain. The latest appointments to the Supreme Court states they are constitutionist (originalist) -- what does that mean for the rule of law?
I say we give Brad Raffesnsperger man of the year for his integrity.
An aside - I've been gifting memberships to this forum --wish I could do so for the Trump base too.
Thank you Dr. HCR and all the enlightened and thoughtful readers here whom I continue to learn and discern with.