I didn't suspect any devious intentions to the recording; I assumed BR chose to record it to protect himself from the lies Trump might tell about the conversation. As turned out to be the case.
I didn't suspect any devious intentions to the recording; I assumed BR chose to record it to protect himself from the lies Trump might tell about the conversation. As turned out to be the case.
I didn't suspect any devious intentions to the recording; I assumed BR chose to record it to protect himself from the lies Trump might tell about the conversation. As turned out to be the case.
Would anyone go into a meeting with DJT without a chaperone or lawyer and a recording device?