Thank you for clarifying this, Margaret. I was not happy to hear that it was recorded without all parties knowing, as that seems devious. But I'm still glad to hear that was not illegal in GA.
Thank you for clarifying this, Margaret. I was not happy to hear that it was recorded without all parties knowing, as that seems devious. But I'm still glad to hear that was not illegal in GA.
I didn't suspect any devious intentions to the recording; I assumed BR chose to record it to protect himself from the lies Trump might tell about the conversation. As turned out to be the case.
Thank you for clarifying this, Margaret. I was not happy to hear that it was recorded without all parties knowing, as that seems devious. But I'm still glad to hear that was not illegal in GA.
I didn't suspect any devious intentions to the recording; I assumed BR chose to record it to protect himself from the lies Trump might tell about the conversation. As turned out to be the case.
Would anyone go into a meeting with DJT without a chaperone or lawyer and a recording device?