If the recording of a conversation is legal if only one party is aware of the recording, it means it's ok to make the recording. Does it also mean the recording can be presented as evidence against the unaware party in a legal proceeding?
I think there is a difference.
If the recording of a conversation is legal if only one party is aware of the recording, it means it's ok to make the recording. Does it also mean the recording can be presented as evidence against the unaware party in a legal proceeding?
If the recording of a conversation is legal if only one party is aware of the recording, it means it's ok to make the recording. Does it also mean the recording can be presented as evidence against the unaware party in a legal proceeding?
I think there is a difference.
The other participants on the call were witnesses and can be called to testify.
I think it is legal and can be used as evidence. I have never agreed with this law, but I am glad for it today!
I wonder what the chances are that Trump also recorded the call?
IsnтАЩt that automatic?
I canтАЩt answer to that. Needs to be researched.
From what a lawyer told me, it does hold up in court. Thank goodness, I didnтАЩt end up needing it, but was happy to be able to get evidence.
Thanks for doing the research.