This is literally disgraceful by the Republicans party and Speaker Johnson to leave on Christmas break without passing a bill to fund Ukraine. Their doing this deliberately for Trump and Putin and to make Biden fail. Republicans in the house are pure evil. They haven't done a damn thing for our national security or the American people. H…
This is literally disgraceful by the Republicans party and Speaker Johnson to leave on Christmas break without passing a bill to fund Ukraine. Their doing this deliberately for Trump and Putin and to make Biden fail. Republicans in the house are pure evil. They haven't done a damn thing for our national security or the American people. Hopefully the Senate will come to a resolution to fund Ukraine. The majority of us who believe in democracy are sick and tired of house Republicans not governing. Not mention them trying to impeach President Biden. I pray that justice will prevail at the end.
The American people are emotionally drained. But we can't give up! We have a tough road ahead in 24. Vote 💙 blue.
Their current stunts seem to me to telegraph weakness' like they have run out of cunning plots and are just acting out in an effort to maintain confusion. They still have a lot of power, so they're still very dangerous, but their lock-step seems to be stumbling.
As Catherine L. notes above, the corrupt of politics have had unprecedented help in maintaining distraction and confusion from the engineered constructions of corporate media. Mainstream media now largely offers neither news nor education but is selling confirmation bias to the citizens they have groomed through deliberate polarization to become addicted to it. The drug comes in both blue and red pill form, and it is deadly, perhaps terminally so, to a functional government that depends on a functioning democracy.
Don't MSNBC, to some extent CNN, and the late-night comics count?
I'd call them all mainstream. But they deal in facts, with interviews of leading actors of the public agenda. Ari Melber often cites figures from today's arts for their keeping the pulse, and all the late-night hosts do the same. So, no, I don't think they're dealing in polarization, given that the other, Republican side has zero public policy programs, withdrawing more and more only to sensationalism.
As Heather Cox Richardson points out, even when it appears they might have a public policy concern (the southern border), they'd rather shirk doing anything about it for the sake of keeping it vitriolically shrieking instead.
Here are two parts of a twelve part series produced with many colleagues last year. It is an academic peer-reviewed blog --a source produced by people who are respected in what they do and backed by peer reviewed research, not secondary sources. Links to primary research help us dig deeper. So do the links on HCR's letters.
We ALL have bias, and the extent to which both blue and red pills control us is revealed in the second link with the quantitative reasoning sample, but read the first one first…and the second one second. ☺
Note a danger symptom to see in ourselves is to start to fool ourselves by reverting to logical fallacies, one trying to substitute the source of an argument for evidence . Who presents the argument has no bearing on resolving the truth of the argument. Don't stop with letting your favorite network tell you what is true. Dig deeper.
More and more Americans are not watching any of the "networks". Cable news is in a spiral dive to irrelevance. Most people who are not reading this news letter get their news on their phones - from a mind bending variety of sources. The debate between MSNBC and FOX ... and the "new" CNN is fast becoming "old" news - an antique way of getting information.
Of course, your concept applies universally. But when we are in the trenches of a world war - it really doesn't matter. You just have to win. Or your way of life dies.
In a theoretical world where the difference between two political parties is a competition between governing philosophies - either of which could function to serve all the people - but using different structures...your depth of reasoning and research would have great value. Choose one or the other or ideally find compromise to achieve a functional middle ground.
But in the present moment, it is a distraction. I get the concept. But today, the red pill means fascism and bigotry towards anything not white male, not "Christian", "America First"...and the enormous one: denying our impact on the Climate Crisis. The red pill has sympathy with a nation that is engaged in genocide and encouraging it elsewhere.
The blue pill is the antithesis of all that exclusive hate. It embraces science. It actually believes in democracy. It is quite imperfect and has been penetrated by the oligarchs as well. It makes many mistakes. But it does want to honor international agreements. It does want to help people with the cost of education, child care, healthcare, food security, clean water, housing.
The choice of pills couldn't be more starkly obvious. Choose red if you are a selfish hater of others. Or choose blue if you think we are all in the same boat and the resources of the world should be shared more widely. Choose blue if you think we should help protect people from disease. Choose blue if you think we should honor and protect the planet that we are perched on.
The best news is news created from actual facts, actual reality, and the Muckrakers typified that with their explosive articles in publications like McClure's Magazine.
I'm pleased that I still have a number of copies of that publication from over a hundred years ago, and credit my high school teachers for having us read the Autobiography of Lincoln Stephens albeit in a shortened version which stopped at the point where he left for Russia and became a Communist. Such were the times.
But my favorite was the legendary muckraker (that is, staunch investigative reporter) Ida Tarbell who exposed the predations of Rockefeller Sr. and his Standard Oil Company (see https://allthatsinteresting.com/ida-tarbell). What a great role for a kid in high school, head and shoulders above journalists today!
As we know from the Trump years, there's a whole lot to be said for fact-based reality and objective, truthful journalism.
Great analysis. CNN is toast. NYT and WAPO hanging on. I think their liberal readers, the majority of their subscribers, are not following either as we once used to. I read them only selectively. HRC has nailed it. We have returned to the age of the crusading Editor. This kind of Editor does not abandon the truth or facts, but expresses them in the context of moral conviction. I am old enough to remember Walter Cronkite, delivering the news. He always did so in a detached, but avuncular way. But the broadcast that sticks in my mind is the time he broke down in tears, reporting the news of the assassination of John Kennedy. From then on, I knew he cared, and it showed increasingly on his reporting of the Vietnam war. Goodbye, Columbia school of journalism. The times are a changin.
My thoughts exactly. Is there sidesism? Bias? Yes. Even in science? Yes, but not nearly to the extent science-deniers (e.g. Republicans, hyper-Christians, vaccine deniers, etc) will have you believe. They are projecting. It is not difficult at all to cite the difference between the blue pill and the red pill when comparing to reality, and a compassionate world view. I first got wind of this long ago with the young earth creationists versus ancient earth and evolution of species. There was clearly a wrong and a right that blew through any tweaking due to bias. And then example after example reared their ugly heads - climate change being the largest and most important. We have biases, but which pill is dominated by them and which not so much?
Despots leading parties have successfully lied their citizens into countless wars (both declared and undeclared) by using a few skillful manipulators to successfully convince a host of followers to "take a side" and cast both reason and research aside. The choice to employ reason and research or let manipulators lead you by your bias to act in their interests is the starkly obvious choice. I see you have lots of support to dump both reason and research.
Sure, in my spare time, I already spend a ridiculous amount of time trying to sort through the sewer. Where is Walter when our survival depends on truth in packaging…
Thanks Ally! I always love reading your posts on this site. If you would rather do a tour in video, the same writers are on here giving a very structured panel at the National Numeracy Network about a year and a half before they produced the blog articles. You only need to endure each of us for about four minutes. :)
I skimmed both articles. I tend to agree with the authors but of course behavioral “science” isn’t science, but I think it more accurately when done right, which it seldom is, is a great illustration of the technique of knowing.
I’ve long had a huge issue with how basic science is taught. It’s useless. No one needs to understand how to balance equations.
As a chemist, loving it so much I have a mass spectrometer in my house, there is a way to teach it so that it is relevant. And it’s relevant if it makes you understand it well enough to read the original ivermectin -might -fight -covid paper and easily understand why it doesn’t show anything of the sort, but raises another question. It’s my current go-to explanation of how scientific studies work.
Your articles are nice for someone who doesn’t know how to think.
Anyone who listens to any of the main stream media on, say, the economy, really isn’t doing their due diligence.
As a chemist, have you noticed any situations in which your pre-existing cognitive biases interfere with data interpretation, I wonder? As in, dismissing studies done in disciplines with different parameters than yours as “not really science”, “only good for people who don’t know how to think” or “shallow”?
"Your articles are nice for someone who doesn’t know how to think."
Yeow! Now that verbal attack is a knife to the front, not in the back. So you're saying that the articles, which I didn't and now won't read, are worthless, a waste of time. Maximum shade there, but being direct and clear may well be called for often; however, experience tells me that the author(s) will now go into defensive mode and reject your comment as just the spawn of a hateful creator. Most of us need a spoonful of sugar to help the medicine go down.
Of course we all have bias and your article does a good job of explaining it.
The problem arises when we try to “both sides” our treatment and one side is holding the gun of facism to our heads, refusing to acknowledge the facts. I do get multiple news inputs, mostly from the sources that Ad Fontes Media puts at top for truthfulness and center for lack of bias (Ap/Reuters, ABC, BBC, NPR).
Thanks Mary Hardt. When you read the math example by Kahan et al. that involves both Republicans and Democrats making their "interpretations" while clutching their little colored pills of choice, you see the thing that drives that is "my-side" bias. What you are calling "both sides" is really my-side bias directing the anger at those who look at the pills and ask "What's in 'em?"
Reading the content fro the first link, a red light flashed caused by the introduction of mathematical analysis of human behavior!
Recall the last financial disaster was brought on by AIG’s bookmaking bets on tranches of financial paper, cobbled together by unscrupulous financial houses, based on the hired quants who claimed their mathematical model was more than 97% accurate!
Ed, Thank you for this resource. As to bias, Will Rogers may have said it best: "It's hard to get a man to see the truth of something when his paycheck depends on him NOT seeing it." Or words to that effect. Too lazy to dig up the exact quote. ;0)
Ed, how timely--I watched this clip from the popular Beau of the Fifth Column yesterday in which he explains how to verify/debunk internet "news" bites. Will people who are biased take the time to do Beau's suggestions? Probably not.
We are both subscribers here for good reasons. Love the historical perspectives Heather brings to this. I prefer good independent media with investigative reporting to the talking heads on network TV.
Letters From an American IS Social Media. Just whom do you think should be doing Heather's research for her? Why should she not be doing her own? This Substack site surely is not peer-reviewed primary research. If you want to try to imply Substack is a variety of QAnon site, you have allies in highly placed Democratic Party operatives who want government to create a legal definition of "a journalist" so they can shut down access to independent journalists not in the employ of corporations. Watch the March "hearings" grilling of Matt Taibbi and how they deprecate Substack. But we are here, and neither one of us is being killed.
Our Letters are full of the work that has been done by journalists and for subscribers who have any doubt about that take a look at 'Notes:' at the
end of this Letter, which started with a story in the Associated Press. Trump and MAGAs bash the 'free press' calling it 'the enemy of the people'. There is a lot of crap in the 'media' and much of 'social media' is a propaganda engine. Let's know the difference and share that news.
Fern, perhaps my overactive imagination is working here, but it seems to me that your comments lately have been fewer and those that appear are brief? I do scan for your comments. I hope that you are well, and the reason that this seems to be happening (at least in my eyes?) is that you have many delightful tasks taking up your time currently.
Miselle, thank you for inquiring about my health, which is okay. I have been around, but, perhaps, a little less frequently and sometimes toward the end of our comments. I appreciate
your kindness and encouragement. All my encouragement and support of your steady engagement in the principles and survival of Democracy.
The Republicans don't ACTUALLY want to fix immigration by debating and hashing out policy details. They just want to use immigration as a cudgel to beat Democrats with to stir up their base to turn out. Right now, I think the R's are using the loss of reproductive rights to fulfill Steve King's remark, "We can't build our country with other people's babies." King, a former congressman from Iowa is indicative of what lots of people think. He is racist, homophobic, misogynistic, anti-immigration, etc. He is against anything not straight, white, Christian, and male.
Yep, we have long had an opportunity to fix immigration, but have failed to do so. So now when things have gotten so bad in countries to the south of us, partially because of our meddling, and people are willing to take long dangerous treks to get here, it is suddenly the Ds who are the problem.
Ed, you are correct about the corporate media and the effect of their propaganda. The Democratic Party needs to take this as a lesson. The idea that "when they go low, we go high" has to be discarded. Why is Biden trashed about the economy when it is soaring? Simple - Republican propaganda. The Democrats need a leader who understands the need to propagandize our case. Jamie Harrison, Chair of the Democratic National Committee, doesn't seem "to get it."
A vast right wing propaganda machine carefully built by corporations and rich folks. To serve there interests.
Supported by outsourcing and offshoring by the same people so that real Americans are disenchanted with the current system that they believe failed them.
A double pronged strategy. Make everyone poor and tell everyone it is the Democrats fault.
Mike, Pres. G.W. Bush nailed it on 3/31/2001 when at the White House Correspondents' Dinner he said: "You can fool some of the people all of the time, and those are the ones you want to concentrate on." Yes, they're aware that there are a lot of people who will listen and follow the Pied Piper.
We are in the choir preaching to each other. Given the lack of credit Biden gets for what he has been able to do, I sometimes wonder if the operatives that control the Party really care. I get the most news of the specific good Biden has done from Progressive news sources like Tom Hartmann on Sirius radio that are not even the "mainstream" Democratic Party cheerleading sites from which I would most expect this to come. This election is for the party to lose by making it all about finger-pointing, which actually puts the focus on the other party instead of on issues that inspire people and that many have long wanted some control over through true representation.
Ed The Economist has two excellent articles on how the media has badly served the American public. One is in this week’s edition. The other is a much longer article in the 1843 Magazine in which ‘Lexington’ describes in great detail how the New York Times fails to fulfill its earlier masthead promise “to provide all the news that is fit to print.”
It seems some want us to choose oligarchy but wrap it in only one of the two terms. I'll not be choosing to be the dualistic thinker like Stefanik was, bullying college presidents with her rhetorical question and demands they choose only her dualistic answers.
Ed, as a geologist with an interest in psychology ('Metacognition'), I would like to know about your knowledge of journalism; understanding of the content of social media, in other words, how much of its presentations are based on journalism versus propaganda. commercial sales, conspiracy theories, etc. Are you informed about how many Americans receive their 'news' from social media as well as its effect on the audiences' political positions, factual understanding of what is happening in their communities, state-wide, in the US as well as the major issues of the time, such as Climate Change and large conflicts around the world, such as in Ukraine, 2nd Congo War, Yemen, Myanmar, Israel, Ethiopia, etc.?
'News Platform Fact Sheet' (PewResearchCenter)
'The transition of the news industry away from print, television and radio into digital spaces has caused huge disruptions in the traditional news industry, especially the print news industry. It is also reflected in the ways individual Americans say they are getting their news. Today, an overwhelming majority of Americans get news at least sometimes from digital devices. Explore the patterns and trends that shape the platforms Americans turn to for news below.'
What are the effects of social media on participatory democracy, our mental health and knowing the difference between facts and propaganda?
Noam Chomsky expressed a philosophy of media and media literacy that I just found and discover that it is similar to my own too. Education, not training, and certainly not partisanship that requires neither, is what prepares one to engage effectively with both information and misinformation.
Of equal impact on our news is the monopolization of the information system by the major corporate publishing houses and putting our primary literature behind their paywalls. I presume you have been following that as well as how the corporations have been using "Trade Agreements" and restrictive fair use to move information beyond reach of not only individuals but also universities and colleges without big endowments? Berkeley did a revolt against Elsevier a while ago that made the news, but most of this goes on quietly until the damage is too great to overcome.
"Ed, as a geologist with an interest in psychology ('Metacognition'), I would like to know about your knowledge of journalism; understanding of the content of social media, in other words, how much of its presentations are based on journalism versus propaganda. commercial sales, conspiracy theories, etc. Are you informed about how many Americans receive their 'news' from social media as well as its effect on the audiences' political positions..." Returning to this a night later.
Journalism is a distinct profession, so to find out the best journalism sources, I tend to go to the sources that accumulate the journalists who receive the recognition from their peers, not from the political parties, the corporations, or the conspiracy recruiters. I can't reach to learn everything in depth, but getting educated in logic enough to recognize fallacies when an advocate is using them, knowing the levels of intellectual development so one understands whether an argument is being made at a dualistic stage rather than at a higher stage of reasoning, and some experience in understanding when the evidence required for an argument is really being offered is much more useful for dealing with real-world problems than acquiring memorized facts. Also, being willing to go to primary sources, to those who peers identified recognized as credible in their fields by electing them as officers of their professional organizations, putting them on the review, editorial boards or advisory boards of their professional journals is a practice I've found useful to quickly getting the advice I need when I don't have it.
I don't think it is possible to have a true democracy without having free access to information and having a populace educated sufficiently to be competent synthesizers and consumers of that information and to know how education differs from training.
I wish they would stop putting trump in the news. Trump MIGHT do this. Trump may face charges for that crime. trump has a rally in Sioux Falls. I know-it is Sioux City Iowa and not in S.D. Just tell me he is convicted. Tell me the gag order is in place yet again (should never have been taken off). No more petty stuff. Keep him out of the paper.
I've seen estimates that the corporate media essentially gave him about 2 billion dollars of free advertising in 2016 every time they featured him. So did the Democratic Party every time they talked about him as "the greater evil" rather than about what they were FOR and what they are going to DO. All that brought him name recognition. Didn't matter that it was negative. It all gave him fame.
MAGA Republicans depend on their supporters being clueless idiots who don't recognize how transparently idiotic their MO is, not to mention the damage to the country domestically and internationally. There is something rotten in the state of Denmark.
The MAGA/KKK are the "True Believers" that Eric Hoffer wrote about in "The True Believer: Thoughts on the Nature of Mass Movements." At its core, the movement is purely racist. I attach KKK to MAGA because that is, IMO, what this is: white Protestant supremacy. That is what is most important to them.
Jim, thank you for this note. True, when I said that the MAGA/KKK are white Protestant supremacists, it would have been more descriptive and more accurate to identify them as "White Protestant Christian supremacists." I capitalized the "C" though they really are Chinos.
Trump alone is a cornucopia of crap. My thoughts are that "GOP" lies are a liability for them that can be used against them, and have not be leveraged enough. The Jan 6th committee was a well organized attempt to advertise the truth, as are an array of trials. The Biden impeachment effort is pretty weak tea, that may fire up the "hypnotized" base, but speak to those who need more encouragement to be politically engaged. For too long corruption has been met with inaction.
However, I read the Wall Street Journal and I can tell you that Trump is well organized and well supported on the right.
If he wins, and, he very well might, he will put in place a highly effective organization that will support Putin's ability to continue to give Trump huge money to do Putin's bidding. Plus, he will be able to get his appointee, Jerome Powell, to print money for him again like he did during the Pandemic.
American Democracy will be over. At least for a while, maybe forever.
Sadly, killing Democracy was a bi-partisan process. Outsourcing and offshoring, an initially Republican led effort, was fully supported by Democrats in the Clinton administration when they passed NAFTA which, instantly created that "great sucking sound" that Ross Perot warned about.....jobs going to Mexico.
Killing American jobs and leaving the working class poor was a bi-partisan effort of American Democracy (paid for by lobby money by big corporations).
That failure of real Democracy to heed the future of the voter has now left us with a huge desire among the "people", to just get rid of the failed system that has not worked for them (or me honestly).
Who can blame them/me? I am one of those that was outsourced to India when I was 61. Of course, the software product I was supporting is now no longer sold because the nice Indian kids could not do the complex work.
But, the laws here that allow corporations to leverage unqualified slave labor in India are the problem. And? Those laws were paid for by big companies in India lobbying my Congressmen and women.
American Democracy is under attack because it has failed so many real Americans. The government John Adams established has been gone for ages supplanted by a government by the corporation, for the corporation and of the corporation (whichever lobbyist just paid of my Congress person).
I would say it is sad, but, it is just reality in America.
Yup. NAFTA symbolizes a sell out by Democrats. A fantasy that by opening the flood gates of global trade - with no guard rails for American workers - would somehow deliver prosperity to all. Dems dumped their core constituency.
Companies COULD have been regulated. If you are going to shut down a factory here, you will be responsible for the towns and employees you are abandoning until they can replace that income and tax base! And you have to give the town a few years warning - providing assistance until it is no longer needed. Hmmm. That cheap labor in China or Mexico would suddenly be less attractive.
What if Clinton and others had taken up the cause of "fly over" country? What if Democrats had protected jobs and families? GOP "populism" would not have been nearly as successful. We handed over the key issue in America to what would become MAGA.
We let corporate Americans put their personal profits over the personal survival of millions of ordinary working Americans. That in itself was a form of fascism.
Although Bill, One CAN have such a "business-first" government if it is counterbalanced by a "social-contract" component of that government (Labor? Socialist?), a component which sees the government as serving the needs of its people AT LEAST as much as the needs of its businesses for inexpensive labor, not necessarily to say competent and reliable employees.
Yes! The Nordic nations are a model of just that. A social support system and a thriving business sector. We are too "exceptional" to look around the world for successful approaches to healthcare, education and retirement.
Maybe if voting was handled as Australia does?
What bogles my mind is that as a highly competitive business person, I would look at my competitors and emulate their successes - trying to use those ideas with my own enhancements. Why doesn't America search the world for what works well and adapt it our unique circumstances?
I spent a little over 3 weeks in Sweden. It sure seemed to me that profit-making business were thriving. But Swedish cities seems somehow more people-friendly. Certainly more architectural art and whimsy.
High taxes, high levels of happiness. Low levels of worry about being deprived of education or healthcare. And lower levels of ostentation. Far from perfect, like anyone. But way ahead of our chaos and disenfranchisement.
Maybe the public good should (which includes unalienable human rights) should always be paramount, but business is very much a part of that, and we get to set the rules that it not stray from the boundaries of, at the very least, doing no harm, and ideally observing a duty to the common weal like any other social entity.
Would it not be reasonable to require contracted offshored production to observe some basic US labor and environmental standards? I noticed that during the worst unemployment of the "Great Recession", companies were still moving whole departments abroad. Patriotic? Somehow they get away it calling any boon to workers "Job Killing" but kill real jobs with little reaction. The "Downsizing" as more and major companies become quasi-monopolies seems accepted as a fact of life, with faint resistance.
This is what feudalism looks like in the 21st Century and narcissists like Musk and Harlan Crow are the new lords. Effective government of the people, by the people, for the people absolutely has to be government of the people, by the people, for the people. We are fully entitled to make rules for corporations as for any other societal entity, including whether or not corporations even exist. The tail has been wagging the dog.
That's a helpful read. Thanks. It makes it clear. Note that in the 7 points mentioned as goals for NAFTA there is no mention of protecting American jobs. The whole project wreaks of "trickle down" economics. If it's good for American companies, then it must be good for Americans. Nope.
The day that workers have equal status with management and stockholders is the day that real democracy could exist in the US. For now, we worship at the altar of "business" which is another name for oligarchy.
And just to drive the point home, when that factory left that Ohio town, it took more than manufacturing jobs. It ripped away employment in every other element of society. Restaurants, grocery stores, real estate sales, hospitals...every enterprise that relied on factory workers income. And schools...
Businesses are an essential part of society. And along with that comes social responsibility.
So… understanding the past is important. More important is looking towards the future and a new approach to governance. HB 1 is a start in addressing dark money sources, a path corporate America abhors. Dems must push this agenda until the outsourced 61 year olds understand the whys and are motivated to act.
The core of "Reaganomics" was defamation of democracy and the glorification of plutocracy. It sounds absurd, but enough of the nation fell for it; big time. Obama was such a breath of fresh air after G. W. Bush, and he had a hell of a mess to clear, but I was greatly disappointed by how consistently he put banks in charge of remediation, with expectable results. How after a robust effort to root out crooks in the Saving and Loan Scandal, crooks got to walk, with a bonus, in the Subprime debacle. Why, after initially passive, hands-off promotion of his own heath plan, he was so keen to push the TPP?
Money is the cancer on our body politic, in the word of Conservative Democrat Fritz Hollings. And isn't that even an understatement? The de facto sale of political outcomes to those with the most money is classic corruption, very serious corruption, and we have been utter fools to tolerate it as a society, as long as we have.
Mike S, I think the drift away from the government John Adams helped define and describe it is not a uniquely American phenomenon but rather represents an international phenomenon arising from the development of railroads in England in the 1820s when the government recognized it needed a more universally recognized time of day so that people in each of the towns to which the trains provided service would know WHEN the train would (most likely) come to/through the station (see Sapiens pp. 350-375 by Yuval Noah Harrari). This led to government increasingly discovering the value of supporting individual mobility and "independence" for industry as well as the value to government itself. This drift away from Adams' concept of government over the past 200 years contributed to the reduction of power and influence of the family throughout the previous history of mankind.
They left because they don't care about Ukraine....or the United States and the American people...or Europe. Don't get me started on how they don't care about fixing borders and our collapsing environment. They are a party of evil which manifests by inaction and prevention of action. They only care about creating chaos ( isn't that the definition of Satanism?).
The border issue—repubs cannot tell the WH what it is they want. Pretty hard to resolve an issue when the other side demands a “solution” but doesn’t know what that might be.
I'm reading We Could Have Been Friends, My Father and I; A Palestinian Memoir by Raja Shehadeh. Re: international negotiations in 1949 -
"What struck me as I read these documents was the clarity, lucidity and precision of the drafting. No doubt this was due to the predominance of legal minds among members of the congress." (This right to return plan was undermined by British/Arab/Israeli agendas). "What a contrast this was to the PLO, which went on to negotiate the most important document, in the first ever negotiations with Israel, which took place in Oslo in 1992, without the presence of a single legal adviser". We see how that ended up. MAGA is our PLO. Hopefully they won't become our Hamas.
We should be filing a class action lawsuit against them for dereliction of duty, and demand our money back in the form of tax rebates, while they work unpaid if they do not get things passed in time. I would like that to be a requirement to their getting paid. Who keeps their jobs elsewhere when they don't do any work, and all they do is cause trouble.
In any case, this is the party of criminals and hypocrites, so it is about time the press starts pointing this out.
Linda, I said basically the same thing during phone calls made to Mike Johnson, James Comer, Jim Jordan, and my very own Mike Kelly. As you might imagine, my comments were met with the resounding sounds of crickets.
I think we should all call Mike Johnson's office say that he is a traitor for undermining our national security by not passing a bill to fund Ukraine. Here are his phone numbers:
I so agree with you ..they can just take their 3 weeks vacation plus all of their benefits and walk out without doing their job?? In what company would they not be fired??
No , I disagree. Their job is to governing this country and the American people in a time of crisis. They took an oath to protect the constitution and this country. They have completely failed in do so. Their blind sided with power for Trump and Putin. To put an traitor and a adversarie first before the safety of your country and the American people is, unexpectabke and shouldn't be tolerated by the people of this country. We should be protesting at their homes.
Thank you, Patricia. I feel the same. I also encourage people to vote blue. Actually, it was nice to read a few bits in the letter today about how things are not going well for Rs instead of the constant drumbeat that all is lost.
Joe Biden needs one's help to fail. Indeed, he has already botched the war in Ukraine. Instead of providing all necessary military aid in a timely manner when the Russians were on the back foot, the Biden Administration hemmed and hawed and negotiated with itself as to whether Ukraine really needed this or that weapons system & etc. Apparently, Biden was petrified that Putin would respond to such escalation with a nuclear strike—which was and is absurd. Anyhow, we have that pusillanimity to thank for the fact that the war has reached a stalemate and will drag on for another year or more. Incidentally, I foresaw the present stalemate back in August:
It's so easy for you to critique from the back seat and in hindsight! But President Biden absolutely had to contend with the possibility of WW3....just as he is doing in the Middle East. And do so with variable and often incomplete information. His job as Commander in Chief is protecting American lives...both military and civilian. His job as President is protecting democracy. He has done both in spades...and across multiple arenas.
A couple of things. Given the fact that I foresaw in August 2023 the strong possibility that Biden's wavering, half-a-loaf policy would produce the present stalemate, I can hardly be charged with criticism in hindsight.
Napoleon said to one of his generals, "Ask me for anything but time." There was, as I said, a moment in time when the Russians were on the back foot, their initial invasion of Ukraine having failed. Instead of capitalizing on that moment, Biden dithered. And so the opportunity to bring the Russo-Ukrainian War to a timely end was thrown away. That is inarguable. And now the war will go on, with more death and destruction, and much less of a chance for a favorable outcome.
As for Biden's fears of World War III, they were illusionary, as I explained in this article, written in September 2022. The last thing Putin wanted then, or wants now, is for Russia to become embroiled in a war with the US and NATO—a war that Russia could never win.
As for the excuse that Biden's actions have been governed by worries about "American lives"—well, if that's the overriding priority then it wouldn't it have been better to stay out of the Russo-Ukrainian War altogether? But presidents can't think like that. Did Lincoln during the Civil War? Did FDR during World War II? They knew that by their decisions there were sending scores of thousands of young men to their deaths. And sometimes that's the job. Biden's not being asked to make such terrible decisions. But he just can't screw up his courage to the sticking point and do what's necessary.
Biden doesn't have the dictatorial powers that would have been necessary to achieve what you claim he should have done. He also has no power over what other countries' governments decide to do. In Ukraine, Biden has not committed any American lives to the struggle, and most of the spending went to American military replacement. I do think more should have been given Ukraine earlier on, but it was the hard right Republicans (doing Putin's wishes) who kept the US from wholesale support of Ukraine. I knew then that Republican support for Ukraine would fail far short of their needs.
As for the historical conflicts you mentioned, Lincoln was forced into the Civil War by Southerners who seceded after his election but before he took office. FDR waited years before joining the WW2 because of the very strong profascism and isolationist movements here in America.
Both were examples of protecting Democracy (and freedom) first...even at the expense of American lives, because the priority of the 2 goals had been flipped by the aggression of the enemy of both.
Right, right, as usual it’s somebody else’s fault. But no. As I detailed and you didn’t dispute, Biden dithered and wavered when he should have acted with decision and dispatch. So now the war’s at a stalemate and what is he proposing to do about that? I doubt he has a clue.
By the way, it’s not true that “hard-right Republicans prevented him from doing more. Can you cite one example of that? No, you can’t.
This is literally disgraceful by the Republicans party and Speaker Johnson to leave on Christmas break without passing a bill to fund Ukraine. Their doing this deliberately for Trump and Putin and to make Biden fail. Republicans in the house are pure evil. They haven't done a damn thing for our national security or the American people. Hopefully the Senate will come to a resolution to fund Ukraine. The majority of us who believe in democracy are sick and tired of house Republicans not governing. Not mention them trying to impeach President Biden. I pray that justice will prevail at the end.
The American people are emotionally drained. But we can't give up! We have a tough road ahead in 24. Vote 💙 blue.
Their current stunts seem to me to telegraph weakness' like they have run out of cunning plots and are just acting out in an effort to maintain confusion. They still have a lot of power, so they're still very dangerous, but their lock-step seems to be stumbling.
As Catherine L. notes above, the corrupt of politics have had unprecedented help in maintaining distraction and confusion from the engineered constructions of corporate media. Mainstream media now largely offers neither news nor education but is selling confirmation bias to the citizens they have groomed through deliberate polarization to become addicted to it. The drug comes in both blue and red pill form, and it is deadly, perhaps terminally so, to a functional government that depends on a functioning democracy.
Don't MSNBC, to some extent CNN, and the late-night comics count?
I'd call them all mainstream. But they deal in facts, with interviews of leading actors of the public agenda. Ari Melber often cites figures from today's arts for their keeping the pulse, and all the late-night hosts do the same. So, no, I don't think they're dealing in polarization, given that the other, Republican side has zero public policy programs, withdrawing more and more only to sensationalism.
As Heather Cox Richardson points out, even when it appears they might have a public policy concern (the southern border), they'd rather shirk doing anything about it for the sake of keeping it vitriolically shrieking instead.
Here are two parts of a twelve part series produced with many colleagues last year. It is an academic peer-reviewed blog --a source produced by people who are respected in what they do and backed by peer reviewed research, not secondary sources. Links to primary research help us dig deeper. So do the links on HCR's letters.
We ALL have bias, and the extent to which both blue and red pills control us is revealed in the second link with the quantitative reasoning sample, but read the first one first…and the second one second. ☺
https://www.improvewithmetacognition.com/understanding-bias-in-behavioral-sciences/
https://www.improvewithmetacognition.com/understanding-bias-in-physical-and-quantitative-sciences/
Note a danger symptom to see in ourselves is to start to fool ourselves by reverting to logical fallacies, one trying to substitute the source of an argument for evidence . Who presents the argument has no bearing on resolving the truth of the argument. Don't stop with letting your favorite network tell you what is true. Dig deeper.
More and more Americans are not watching any of the "networks". Cable news is in a spiral dive to irrelevance. Most people who are not reading this news letter get their news on their phones - from a mind bending variety of sources. The debate between MSNBC and FOX ... and the "new" CNN is fast becoming "old" news - an antique way of getting information.
Of course, your concept applies universally. But when we are in the trenches of a world war - it really doesn't matter. You just have to win. Or your way of life dies.
In a theoretical world where the difference between two political parties is a competition between governing philosophies - either of which could function to serve all the people - but using different structures...your depth of reasoning and research would have great value. Choose one or the other or ideally find compromise to achieve a functional middle ground.
But in the present moment, it is a distraction. I get the concept. But today, the red pill means fascism and bigotry towards anything not white male, not "Christian", "America First"...and the enormous one: denying our impact on the Climate Crisis. The red pill has sympathy with a nation that is engaged in genocide and encouraging it elsewhere.
The blue pill is the antithesis of all that exclusive hate. It embraces science. It actually believes in democracy. It is quite imperfect and has been penetrated by the oligarchs as well. It makes many mistakes. But it does want to honor international agreements. It does want to help people with the cost of education, child care, healthcare, food security, clean water, housing.
The choice of pills couldn't be more starkly obvious. Choose red if you are a selfish hater of others. Or choose blue if you think we are all in the same boat and the resources of the world should be shared more widely. Choose blue if you think we should help protect people from disease. Choose blue if you think we should honor and protect the planet that we are perched on.
Bill,
And? The blue pill has also gone through clinical trials successfully with widespread positive outcomes for some folks!!
Thank you. The constant both sidesism is tiresome. You well describe the difference.
The best news is news created from actual facts, actual reality, and the Muckrakers typified that with their explosive articles in publications like McClure's Magazine.
I'm pleased that I still have a number of copies of that publication from over a hundred years ago, and credit my high school teachers for having us read the Autobiography of Lincoln Stephens albeit in a shortened version which stopped at the point where he left for Russia and became a Communist. Such were the times.
But my favorite was the legendary muckraker (that is, staunch investigative reporter) Ida Tarbell who exposed the predations of Rockefeller Sr. and his Standard Oil Company (see https://allthatsinteresting.com/ida-tarbell). What a great role for a kid in high school, head and shoulders above journalists today!
As we know from the Trump years, there's a whole lot to be said for fact-based reality and objective, truthful journalism.
Blue please.
Great analysis. CNN is toast. NYT and WAPO hanging on. I think their liberal readers, the majority of their subscribers, are not following either as we once used to. I read them only selectively. HRC has nailed it. We have returned to the age of the crusading Editor. This kind of Editor does not abandon the truth or facts, but expresses them in the context of moral conviction. I am old enough to remember Walter Cronkite, delivering the news. He always did so in a detached, but avuncular way. But the broadcast that sticks in my mind is the time he broke down in tears, reporting the news of the assassination of John Kennedy. From then on, I knew he cared, and it showed increasingly on his reporting of the Vietnam war. Goodbye, Columbia school of journalism. The times are a changin.
Interesting analysis, Bill. Thank you.
My thoughts exactly. Is there sidesism? Bias? Yes. Even in science? Yes, but not nearly to the extent science-deniers (e.g. Republicans, hyper-Christians, vaccine deniers, etc) will have you believe. They are projecting. It is not difficult at all to cite the difference between the blue pill and the red pill when comparing to reality, and a compassionate world view. I first got wind of this long ago with the young earth creationists versus ancient earth and evolution of species. There was clearly a wrong and a right that blew through any tweaking due to bias. And then example after example reared their ugly heads - climate change being the largest and most important. We have biases, but which pill is dominated by them and which not so much?
Aspirational Blue here....
We can do more in '24! VOTE BLUE!!!!
Around here, a disheartening number of locals get their 'news' from the boys down at the local diner, when they meet for their morning coffee.
"Reasoning" and "Research" is a distraction???
Despots leading parties have successfully lied their citizens into countless wars (both declared and undeclared) by using a few skillful manipulators to successfully convince a host of followers to "take a side" and cast both reason and research aside. The choice to employ reason and research or let manipulators lead you by your bias to act in their interests is the starkly obvious choice. I see you have lots of support to dump both reason and research.
Very well said, Bill.
Sure, in my spare time, I already spend a ridiculous amount of time trying to sort through the sewer. Where is Walter when our survival depends on truth in packaging…
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5gwbcDqTyGQ
Ed, you are gonna make my brain work with those. I have them bookmarked, and will try them after the magic bean juice has done its work.
Thanks Ally! I always love reading your posts on this site. If you would rather do a tour in video, the same writers are on here giving a very structured panel at the National Numeracy Network about a year and a half before they produced the blog articles. You only need to endure each of us for about four minutes. :)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oRuGd9I-Hzw
I skimmed both articles. I tend to agree with the authors but of course behavioral “science” isn’t science, but I think it more accurately when done right, which it seldom is, is a great illustration of the technique of knowing.
I’ve long had a huge issue with how basic science is taught. It’s useless. No one needs to understand how to balance equations.
As a chemist, loving it so much I have a mass spectrometer in my house, there is a way to teach it so that it is relevant. And it’s relevant if it makes you understand it well enough to read the original ivermectin -might -fight -covid paper and easily understand why it doesn’t show anything of the sort, but raises another question. It’s my current go-to explanation of how scientific studies work.
Your articles are nice for someone who doesn’t know how to think.
Anyone who listens to any of the main stream media on, say, the economy, really isn’t doing their due diligence.
"I’ve long had a huge issue with how basic science is taught. It’s useless. No one needs to understand how to balance equations."
Maybe no one except chemists.?
As a chemist, have you noticed any situations in which your pre-existing cognitive biases interfere with data interpretation, I wonder? As in, dismissing studies done in disciplines with different parameters than yours as “not really science”, “only good for people who don’t know how to think” or “shallow”?
"Your articles are nice for someone who doesn’t know how to think."
Yeow! Now that verbal attack is a knife to the front, not in the back. So you're saying that the articles, which I didn't and now won't read, are worthless, a waste of time. Maximum shade there, but being direct and clear may well be called for often; however, experience tells me that the author(s) will now go into defensive mode and reject your comment as just the spawn of a hateful creator. Most of us need a spoonful of sugar to help the medicine go down.
Ed,
Of course we all have bias and your article does a good job of explaining it.
The problem arises when we try to “both sides” our treatment and one side is holding the gun of facism to our heads, refusing to acknowledge the facts. I do get multiple news inputs, mostly from the sources that Ad Fontes Media puts at top for truthfulness and center for lack of bias (Ap/Reuters, ABC, BBC, NPR).
https://adfontesmedia.com/gallery/
Thanks Mary Hardt. When you read the math example by Kahan et al. that involves both Republicans and Democrats making their "interpretations" while clutching their little colored pills of choice, you see the thing that drives that is "my-side" bias. What you are calling "both sides" is really my-side bias directing the anger at those who look at the pills and ask "What's in 'em?"
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2319992 (This is for those who might have asked such a question too, rather than popped a pill to please peers).
Reading the content fro the first link, a red light flashed caused by the introduction of mathematical analysis of human behavior!
Recall the last financial disaster was brought on by AIG’s bookmaking bets on tranches of financial paper, cobbled together by unscrupulous financial houses, based on the hired quants who claimed their mathematical model was more than 97% accurate!
You will like this even less. It comes out of the work done by the same people who wrote the articles that Jen Andrews found "shallow." https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/the-dunning-kruger-effect-isnt-what-you-think-it-is/
Ed, Thank you for this resource. As to bias, Will Rogers may have said it best: "It's hard to get a man to see the truth of something when his paycheck depends on him NOT seeing it." Or words to that effect. Too lazy to dig up the exact quote. ;0)
Ed, how timely--I watched this clip from the popular Beau of the Fifth Column yesterday in which he explains how to verify/debunk internet "news" bites. Will people who are biased take the time to do Beau's suggestions? Probably not.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5gwbcDqTyGQ
Thanks for your links. Reading the comments from this forum is a worthy continuing education seminar for this senior citizen.
Bye the way, I did watch Beau's video.
We are both subscribers here for good reasons. Love the historical perspectives Heather brings to this. I prefer good independent media with investigative reporting to the talking heads on network TV.
“Dig deeper”??? Sounds like QAnon’s “Do your own research.”
Which of course means: Hunt down the sites and people and false prophets that support your particular beliefs.
Social media is KILLING us.
Letters From an American IS Social Media. Just whom do you think should be doing Heather's research for her? Why should she not be doing her own? This Substack site surely is not peer-reviewed primary research. If you want to try to imply Substack is a variety of QAnon site, you have allies in highly placed Democratic Party operatives who want government to create a legal definition of "a journalist" so they can shut down access to independent journalists not in the employ of corporations. Watch the March "hearings" grilling of Matt Taibbi and how they deprecate Substack. But we are here, and neither one of us is being killed.
Thank you so much. A dozen of us worked really hard on what turned out to be a bigger project with over a dozen articles than we anticipated.
Our Letters are full of the work that has been done by journalists and for subscribers who have any doubt about that take a look at 'Notes:' at the
end of this Letter, which started with a story in the Associated Press. Trump and MAGAs bash the 'free press' calling it 'the enemy of the people'. There is a lot of crap in the 'media' and much of 'social media' is a propaganda engine. Let's know the difference and share that news.
Fern, perhaps my overactive imagination is working here, but it seems to me that your comments lately have been fewer and those that appear are brief? I do scan for your comments. I hope that you are well, and the reason that this seems to be happening (at least in my eyes?) is that you have many delightful tasks taking up your time currently.
Miselle, thank you for inquiring about my health, which is okay. I have been around, but, perhaps, a little less frequently and sometimes toward the end of our comments. I appreciate
your kindness and encouragement. All my encouragement and support of your steady engagement in the principles and survival of Democracy.
The Republicans don't ACTUALLY want to fix immigration by debating and hashing out policy details. They just want to use immigration as a cudgel to beat Democrats with to stir up their base to turn out. Right now, I think the R's are using the loss of reproductive rights to fulfill Steve King's remark, "We can't build our country with other people's babies." King, a former congressman from Iowa is indicative of what lots of people think. He is racist, homophobic, misogynistic, anti-immigration, etc. He is against anything not straight, white, Christian, and male.
Yep, we have long had an opportunity to fix immigration, but have failed to do so. So now when things have gotten so bad in countries to the south of us, partially because of our meddling, and people are willing to take long dangerous treks to get here, it is suddenly the Ds who are the problem.
Perhaps the over hyped southern border problem should have been solved before the ancestors of the magas were admitted to their port of call!
Last week I was surprised to learn that more people (20 million a night, I believe) watch CBS, NBC and ABC news than all the cable networks combined.
Not good.
Geez, THANK you, Phil.
Ed, you are correct about the corporate media and the effect of their propaganda. The Democratic Party needs to take this as a lesson. The idea that "when they go low, we go high" has to be discarded. Why is Biden trashed about the economy when it is soaring? Simple - Republican propaganda. The Democrats need a leader who understands the need to propagandize our case. Jamie Harrison, Chair of the Democratic National Committee, doesn't seem "to get it."
A vast right wing propaganda machine carefully built by corporations and rich folks. To serve there interests.
Supported by outsourcing and offshoring by the same people so that real Americans are disenchanted with the current system that they believe failed them.
A double pronged strategy. Make everyone poor and tell everyone it is the Democrats fault.
Working pretty well as far as I can tell.
Mike, Pres. G.W. Bush nailed it on 3/31/2001 when at the White House Correspondents' Dinner he said: "You can fool some of the people all of the time, and those are the ones you want to concentrate on." Yes, they're aware that there are a lot of people who will listen and follow the Pied Piper.
Richard,
Thanks. I had not previously heard the quote so thank you. I am not surprised. Bush II and Cheney had hearts of pure evil combined with minds of mush.
We have the leader you describe. Joe Biden.
We are in the choir preaching to each other. Given the lack of credit Biden gets for what he has been able to do, I sometimes wonder if the operatives that control the Party really care. I get the most news of the specific good Biden has done from Progressive news sources like Tom Hartmann on Sirius radio that are not even the "mainstream" Democratic Party cheerleading sites from which I would most expect this to come. This election is for the party to lose by making it all about finger-pointing, which actually puts the focus on the other party instead of on issues that inspire people and that many have long wanted some control over through true representation.
Ed The Economist has two excellent articles on how the media has badly served the American public. One is in this week’s edition. The other is a much longer article in the 1843 Magazine in which ‘Lexington’ describes in great detail how the New York Times fails to fulfill its earlier masthead promise “to provide all the news that is fit to print.”
Thanks Keith. I used to subscribe but given your tip I will try to dig these out. Really do appreciate the resources!
True, as far as it goes, but there is no equivalence. Choose fascism or democracy.
It seems some want us to choose oligarchy but wrap it in only one of the two terms. I'll not be choosing to be the dualistic thinker like Stefanik was, bullying college presidents with her rhetorical question and demands they choose only her dualistic answers.
Ed, as a geologist with an interest in psychology ('Metacognition'), I would like to know about your knowledge of journalism; understanding of the content of social media, in other words, how much of its presentations are based on journalism versus propaganda. commercial sales, conspiracy theories, etc. Are you informed about how many Americans receive their 'news' from social media as well as its effect on the audiences' political positions, factual understanding of what is happening in their communities, state-wide, in the US as well as the major issues of the time, such as Climate Change and large conflicts around the world, such as in Ukraine, 2nd Congo War, Yemen, Myanmar, Israel, Ethiopia, etc.?
'News Platform Fact Sheet' (PewResearchCenter)
'The transition of the news industry away from print, television and radio into digital spaces has caused huge disruptions in the traditional news industry, especially the print news industry. It is also reflected in the ways individual Americans say they are getting their news. Today, an overwhelming majority of Americans get news at least sometimes from digital devices. Explore the patterns and trends that shape the platforms Americans turn to for news below.'
What are the effects of social media on participatory democracy, our mental health and knowing the difference between facts and propaganda?
https://www.pewresearch.org/journalism/fact-sheet/news-platform-fact-sheet/
Where Americans get their news: New data from Pew ...
https://www.prdaily.com/where-americans-get-their-news-new-data-from-pew-research/
Noam Chomsky expressed a philosophy of media and media literacy that I just found and discover that it is similar to my own too. Education, not training, and certainly not partisanship that requires neither, is what prepares one to engage effectively with both information and misinformation.
https://progressivehub.net/conformist-media-outlets-hide-realities-of-power-noam-chomsky-has-exposed-them/?eType=EmailBlastContent&eId=8577f8f7-3886-4dfd-b11d-5ebf81fe5ac6
I had written you a long reply and clicked on a link (https://www.opensecrets.org/industries//summary?ind=Q05&recipdetail=S&sortorder=S&mem=Y&cycle=2022) to add to several and the Substack platform erased it all. I'll try putting it back again tomorrow. Gallup carries research similar to Pew's https://news.gallup.com/poll/403166/americans-trust-media-remains-near-record-low.aspx and if one is going to use digital sources one needs to have bookmarked links to check the sources like MediaBias FactCheck and Snopes.
Of equal impact on our news is the monopolization of the information system by the major corporate publishing houses and putting our primary literature behind their paywalls. I presume you have been following that as well as how the corporations have been using "Trade Agreements" and restrictive fair use to move information beyond reach of not only individuals but also universities and colleges without big endowments? Berkeley did a revolt against Elsevier a while ago that made the news, but most of this goes on quietly until the damage is too great to overcome.
"Ed, as a geologist with an interest in psychology ('Metacognition'), I would like to know about your knowledge of journalism; understanding of the content of social media, in other words, how much of its presentations are based on journalism versus propaganda. commercial sales, conspiracy theories, etc. Are you informed about how many Americans receive their 'news' from social media as well as its effect on the audiences' political positions..." Returning to this a night later.
Journalism is a distinct profession, so to find out the best journalism sources, I tend to go to the sources that accumulate the journalists who receive the recognition from their peers, not from the political parties, the corporations, or the conspiracy recruiters. I can't reach to learn everything in depth, but getting educated in logic enough to recognize fallacies when an advocate is using them, knowing the levels of intellectual development so one understands whether an argument is being made at a dualistic stage rather than at a higher stage of reasoning, and some experience in understanding when the evidence required for an argument is really being offered is much more useful for dealing with real-world problems than acquiring memorized facts. Also, being willing to go to primary sources, to those who peers identified recognized as credible in their fields by electing them as officers of their professional organizations, putting them on the review, editorial boards or advisory boards of their professional journals is a practice I've found useful to quickly getting the advice I need when I don't have it.
I don't think it is possible to have a true democracy without having free access to information and having a populace educated sufficiently to be competent synthesizers and consumers of that information and to know how education differs from training.
I wish they would stop putting trump in the news. Trump MIGHT do this. Trump may face charges for that crime. trump has a rally in Sioux Falls. I know-it is Sioux City Iowa and not in S.D. Just tell me he is convicted. Tell me the gag order is in place yet again (should never have been taken off). No more petty stuff. Keep him out of the paper.
I've seen estimates that the corporate media essentially gave him about 2 billion dollars of free advertising in 2016 every time they featured him. So did the Democratic Party every time they talked about him as "the greater evil" rather than about what they were FOR and what they are going to DO. All that brought him name recognition. Didn't matter that it was negative. It all gave him fame.
MAGA Republicans depend on their supporters being clueless idiots who don't recognize how transparently idiotic their MO is, not to mention the damage to the country domestically and internationally. There is something rotten in the state of Denmark.
The MAGA/KKK are the "True Believers" that Eric Hoffer wrote about in "The True Believer: Thoughts on the Nature of Mass Movements." At its core, the movement is purely racist. I attach KKK to MAGA because that is, IMO, what this is: white Protestant supremacy. That is what is most important to them.
BINGO! You nailed it!
Richard, I think that you’re insulting them by not using the word christian - unless your omission is intentional?
Jim, thank you for this note. True, when I said that the MAGA/KKK are white Protestant supremacists, it would have been more descriptive and more accurate to identify them as "White Protestant Christian supremacists." I capitalized the "C" though they really are Chinos.
We MUST vote them out of power in 2024! Otherwise they will continue to bring down our republic and our people.
Absolutely.
Make that “goose step!” And just ask Kate Cox if they appear to be stumbling!
J L, are you saying that the R's are running out of sh*t to flood the zone with? I would have thought they had an inexhaustible supply!
Trump alone is a cornucopia of crap. My thoughts are that "GOP" lies are a liability for them that can be used against them, and have not be leveraged enough. The Jan 6th committee was a well organized attempt to advertise the truth, as are an array of trials. The Biden impeachment effort is pretty weak tea, that may fire up the "hypnotized" base, but speak to those who need more encouragement to be politically engaged. For too long corruption has been met with inaction.
And, the only liver that will be eaten is orange and will go well with a "good chianti & fava beans." Yum.
To your point this is a good read.
https://open.substack.com/pub/aaronrupar/p/jack-smith-scotus-petition-presidential-immunity?r=dy5ew&utm_medium=ios&utm_campaign=post
If you read the WH fb page, you can see what propaganda is being feed to them without enduring faux news
I will vote blue.
However, I read the Wall Street Journal and I can tell you that Trump is well organized and well supported on the right.
If he wins, and, he very well might, he will put in place a highly effective organization that will support Putin's ability to continue to give Trump huge money to do Putin's bidding. Plus, he will be able to get his appointee, Jerome Powell, to print money for him again like he did during the Pandemic.
American Democracy will be over. At least for a while, maybe forever.
Sadly, killing Democracy was a bi-partisan process. Outsourcing and offshoring, an initially Republican led effort, was fully supported by Democrats in the Clinton administration when they passed NAFTA which, instantly created that "great sucking sound" that Ross Perot warned about.....jobs going to Mexico.
Killing American jobs and leaving the working class poor was a bi-partisan effort of American Democracy (paid for by lobby money by big corporations).
That failure of real Democracy to heed the future of the voter has now left us with a huge desire among the "people", to just get rid of the failed system that has not worked for them (or me honestly).
Who can blame them/me? I am one of those that was outsourced to India when I was 61. Of course, the software product I was supporting is now no longer sold because the nice Indian kids could not do the complex work.
But, the laws here that allow corporations to leverage unqualified slave labor in India are the problem. And? Those laws were paid for by big companies in India lobbying my Congressmen and women.
American Democracy is under attack because it has failed so many real Americans. The government John Adams established has been gone for ages supplanted by a government by the corporation, for the corporation and of the corporation (whichever lobbyist just paid of my Congress person).
I would say it is sad, but, it is just reality in America.
https://www.wsj.com/politics/elections/the-conservative-coterie-behind-trumps-second-term-agenda-3c13b533?page=1
Yup. NAFTA symbolizes a sell out by Democrats. A fantasy that by opening the flood gates of global trade - with no guard rails for American workers - would somehow deliver prosperity to all. Dems dumped their core constituency.
Companies COULD have been regulated. If you are going to shut down a factory here, you will be responsible for the towns and employees you are abandoning until they can replace that income and tax base! And you have to give the town a few years warning - providing assistance until it is no longer needed. Hmmm. That cheap labor in China or Mexico would suddenly be less attractive.
What if Clinton and others had taken up the cause of "fly over" country? What if Democrats had protected jobs and families? GOP "populism" would not have been nearly as successful. We handed over the key issue in America to what would become MAGA.
We let corporate Americans put their personal profits over the personal survival of millions of ordinary working Americans. That in itself was a form of fascism.
Nobles: one
Peasants: zero
Profits of gun manufacturers over the lives of children
Although Bill, One CAN have such a "business-first" government if it is counterbalanced by a "social-contract" component of that government (Labor? Socialist?), a component which sees the government as serving the needs of its people AT LEAST as much as the needs of its businesses for inexpensive labor, not necessarily to say competent and reliable employees.
Yes! The Nordic nations are a model of just that. A social support system and a thriving business sector. We are too "exceptional" to look around the world for successful approaches to healthcare, education and retirement.
Maybe if voting was handled as Australia does?
What bogles my mind is that as a highly competitive business person, I would look at my competitors and emulate their successes - trying to use those ideas with my own enhancements. Why doesn't America search the world for what works well and adapt it our unique circumstances?
The answer is obvious and sad.
I spent a little over 3 weeks in Sweden. It sure seemed to me that profit-making business were thriving. But Swedish cities seems somehow more people-friendly. Certainly more architectural art and whimsy.
High taxes, high levels of happiness. Low levels of worry about being deprived of education or healthcare. And lower levels of ostentation. Far from perfect, like anyone. But way ahead of our chaos and disenfranchisement.
AMEN says I!
Maybe the public good should (which includes unalienable human rights) should always be paramount, but business is very much a part of that, and we get to set the rules that it not stray from the boundaries of, at the very least, doing no harm, and ideally observing a duty to the common weal like any other social entity.
I teally appreciate this info and insight, Bill. Thank you.
Would it not be reasonable to require contracted offshored production to observe some basic US labor and environmental standards? I noticed that during the worst unemployment of the "Great Recession", companies were still moving whole departments abroad. Patriotic? Somehow they get away it calling any boon to workers "Job Killing" but kill real jobs with little reaction. The "Downsizing" as more and major companies become quasi-monopolies seems accepted as a fact of life, with faint resistance.
This is what feudalism looks like in the 21st Century and narcissists like Musk and Harlan Crow are the new lords. Effective government of the people, by the people, for the people absolutely has to be government of the people, by the people, for the people. We are fully entitled to make rules for corporations as for any other societal entity, including whether or not corporations even exist. The tail has been wagging the dog.
https://www.thebalancemoney.com/history-of-nafta-3306272
That's a helpful read. Thanks. It makes it clear. Note that in the 7 points mentioned as goals for NAFTA there is no mention of protecting American jobs. The whole project wreaks of "trickle down" economics. If it's good for American companies, then it must be good for Americans. Nope.
The day that workers have equal status with management and stockholders is the day that real democracy could exist in the US. For now, we worship at the altar of "business" which is another name for oligarchy.
And just to drive the point home, when that factory left that Ohio town, it took more than manufacturing jobs. It ripped away employment in every other element of society. Restaurants, grocery stores, real estate sales, hospitals...every enterprise that relied on factory workers income. And schools...
Businesses are an essential part of society. And along with that comes social responsibility.
(I am a retired business man :)
As Richard Wolff says, without democracy in the workplace, we can’t have a democracy.
WSJ is Rupert’s rag, propaganda that Fox wouldn’t bother with
Mornin' Jeri!
Yes, I know but I still read some of it. I want to know what the investment community is being fed.
You can be sure Rupert approves
Jeri,
I might need Rupert after Trump wins so, in keeping with "keep your enemy closer"......here's a morning cheer!
If you can stand the stench…
So… understanding the past is important. More important is looking towards the future and a new approach to governance. HB 1 is a start in addressing dark money sources, a path corporate America abhors. Dems must push this agenda until the outsourced 61 year olds understand the whys and are motivated to act.
The core of "Reaganomics" was defamation of democracy and the glorification of plutocracy. It sounds absurd, but enough of the nation fell for it; big time. Obama was such a breath of fresh air after G. W. Bush, and he had a hell of a mess to clear, but I was greatly disappointed by how consistently he put banks in charge of remediation, with expectable results. How after a robust effort to root out crooks in the Saving and Loan Scandal, crooks got to walk, with a bonus, in the Subprime debacle. Why, after initially passive, hands-off promotion of his own heath plan, he was so keen to push the TPP?
Money is the cancer on our body politic, in the word of Conservative Democrat Fritz Hollings. And isn't that even an understatement? The de facto sale of political outcomes to those with the most money is classic corruption, very serious corruption, and we have been utter fools to tolerate it as a society, as long as we have.
Mike S, I think the drift away from the government John Adams helped define and describe it is not a uniquely American phenomenon but rather represents an international phenomenon arising from the development of railroads in England in the 1820s when the government recognized it needed a more universally recognized time of day so that people in each of the towns to which the trains provided service would know WHEN the train would (most likely) come to/through the station (see Sapiens pp. 350-375 by Yuval Noah Harrari). This led to government increasingly discovering the value of supporting individual mobility and "independence" for industry as well as the value to government itself. This drift away from Adams' concept of government over the past 200 years contributed to the reduction of power and influence of the family throughout the previous history of mankind.
They left because they don't care about Ukraine....or the United States and the American people...or Europe. Don't get me started on how they don't care about fixing borders and our collapsing environment. They are a party of evil which manifests by inaction and prevention of action. They only care about creating chaos ( isn't that the definition of Satanism?).
The border issue—repubs cannot tell the WH what it is they want. Pretty hard to resolve an issue when the other side demands a “solution” but doesn’t know what that might be.
“Confusion is the devil’s tool.” A quote from the ages.
I'm reading We Could Have Been Friends, My Father and I; A Palestinian Memoir by Raja Shehadeh. Re: international negotiations in 1949 -
"What struck me as I read these documents was the clarity, lucidity and precision of the drafting. No doubt this was due to the predominance of legal minds among members of the congress." (This right to return plan was undermined by British/Arab/Israeli agendas). "What a contrast this was to the PLO, which went on to negotiate the most important document, in the first ever negotiations with Israel, which took place in Oslo in 1992, without the presence of a single legal adviser". We see how that ended up. MAGA is our PLO. Hopefully they won't become our Hamas.
We should be filing a class action lawsuit against them for dereliction of duty, and demand our money back in the form of tax rebates, while they work unpaid if they do not get things passed in time. I would like that to be a requirement to their getting paid. Who keeps their jobs elsewhere when they don't do any work, and all they do is cause trouble.
In any case, this is the party of criminals and hypocrites, so it is about time the press starts pointing this out.
Linda, I said basically the same thing during phone calls made to Mike Johnson, James Comer, Jim Jordan, and my very own Mike Kelly. As you might imagine, my comments were met with the resounding sounds of crickets.
I think we should all call Mike Johnson's office say that he is a traitor for undermining our national security by not passing a bill to fund Ukraine. Here are his phone numbers:
DC: 202-225-2777
Leesville, LA: 337-423-4232
Bossier City, LA: 318-840-0309
Will do!!
Great!! 🙏🏼🙏🏿🙏
I so agree with you ..they can just take their 3 weeks vacation plus all of their benefits and walk out without doing their job?? In what company would they not be fired??
Bravo!!!
No , I disagree. Their job is to governing this country and the American people in a time of crisis. They took an oath to protect the constitution and this country. They have completely failed in do so. Their blind sided with power for Trump and Putin. To put an traitor and a adversarie first before the safety of your country and the American people is, unexpectabke and shouldn't be tolerated by the people of this country. We should be protesting at their homes.
Thank you, Patricia. I feel the same. I also encourage people to vote blue. Actually, it was nice to read a few bits in the letter today about how things are not going well for Rs instead of the constant drumbeat that all is lost.
Joe Biden needs one's help to fail. Indeed, he has already botched the war in Ukraine. Instead of providing all necessary military aid in a timely manner when the Russians were on the back foot, the Biden Administration hemmed and hawed and negotiated with itself as to whether Ukraine really needed this or that weapons system & etc. Apparently, Biden was petrified that Putin would respond to such escalation with a nuclear strike—which was and is absurd. Anyhow, we have that pusillanimity to thank for the fact that the war has reached a stalemate and will drag on for another year or more. Incidentally, I foresaw the present stalemate back in August:
https://unwokeindianaag.substack.com/p/biden-botches-ukraine
It's so easy for you to critique from the back seat and in hindsight! But President Biden absolutely had to contend with the possibility of WW3....just as he is doing in the Middle East. And do so with variable and often incomplete information. His job as Commander in Chief is protecting American lives...both military and civilian. His job as President is protecting democracy. He has done both in spades...and across multiple arenas.
A couple of things. Given the fact that I foresaw in August 2023 the strong possibility that Biden's wavering, half-a-loaf policy would produce the present stalemate, I can hardly be charged with criticism in hindsight.
Napoleon said to one of his generals, "Ask me for anything but time." There was, as I said, a moment in time when the Russians were on the back foot, their initial invasion of Ukraine having failed. Instead of capitalizing on that moment, Biden dithered. And so the opportunity to bring the Russo-Ukrainian War to a timely end was thrown away. That is inarguable. And now the war will go on, with more death and destruction, and much less of a chance for a favorable outcome.
As for Biden's fears of World War III, they were illusionary, as I explained in this article, written in September 2022. The last thing Putin wanted then, or wants now, is for Russia to become embroiled in a war with the US and NATO—a war that Russia could never win.
https://unwokeindianaag.substack.com/p/vladimir-strangelove-putin
As for the excuse that Biden's actions have been governed by worries about "American lives"—well, if that's the overriding priority then it wouldn't it have been better to stay out of the Russo-Ukrainian War altogether? But presidents can't think like that. Did Lincoln during the Civil War? Did FDR during World War II? They knew that by their decisions there were sending scores of thousands of young men to their deaths. And sometimes that's the job. Biden's not being asked to make such terrible decisions. But he just can't screw up his courage to the sticking point and do what's necessary.
Biden doesn't have the dictatorial powers that would have been necessary to achieve what you claim he should have done. He also has no power over what other countries' governments decide to do. In Ukraine, Biden has not committed any American lives to the struggle, and most of the spending went to American military replacement. I do think more should have been given Ukraine earlier on, but it was the hard right Republicans (doing Putin's wishes) who kept the US from wholesale support of Ukraine. I knew then that Republican support for Ukraine would fail far short of their needs.
As for the historical conflicts you mentioned, Lincoln was forced into the Civil War by Southerners who seceded after his election but before he took office. FDR waited years before joining the WW2 because of the very strong profascism and isolationist movements here in America.
Both were examples of protecting Democracy (and freedom) first...even at the expense of American lives, because the priority of the 2 goals had been flipped by the aggression of the enemy of both.
Right, right, as usual it’s somebody else’s fault. But no. As I detailed and you didn’t dispute, Biden dithered and wavered when he should have acted with decision and dispatch. So now the war’s at a stalemate and what is he proposing to do about that? I doubt he has a clue.
By the way, it’s not true that “hard-right Republicans prevented him from doing more. Can you cite one example of that? No, you can’t.
Hard right Republicans are preventing Ukraine aid RIGHT NOW, and being praised for it in Russian press.