646 Comments
User's avatar
Constance McCutcheon's avatar

Harvard's suit observes: “The government has not—and cannot—identify any rational connection between antisemitism concerns and the medical, scientific, technological, and other research it has frozen . . . " Of course the government cannot. That's because this is extortion.

Expand full comment
Linda Weide's avatar

It is extortion, but at the same time it is also the destruction of the American research and education system. My husband is a scientist and their approved funding is frozen. If they do not release it my husband is going to retire early. So, that is one way they will save money, but by saving money research is not getting done.

I am glad that Harvard is countering Trump and can take him on with their 50 bil dollar endowment. It would be nice to see other universities joining them. I also think that Harvard should rescind the degrees from anyone working with or for Trump because they are violating an ethical code that Harvard should at this point be insisting on from their alumni. Other Universities would be wise to do the same thing, and take back degrees from people who do not live up to a code of ethics.

Expand full comment
Constance McCutcheon's avatar

For sure. You’ve summed it up very well. What we stand to lose is immeasurable wealth in knowledge, talent, and so much more. And unity of higher education is indispensable, although I am disappointed it was not there at the outset of this onslaught.

Expand full comment
Bill Katz's avatar

I’m sorry to express that the government will be totally destroyed and a complete collapse is on the verge of happening. Only then can it attempt a rebuild. The phenix will rise but not after total destruction .

planes are exploding. A new pandemic is in the rise now with no capacity for found cures as millions die in the streets. Dante’s doors have been opened. Even the papa has taken leave. The total rape and pillaging of America is at hand. The high metal fencing surrounding the White House were place not to protect the inside residents from attack but to isolate the monsters within.

The devils are at the gates.

Expand full comment
Marc Nevas's avatar

Bill, the condition you describe sounds like the Christian definition of the word “apocalypse.“ The true definition of the word comes from the ancient Greeks, and it means to uncover that which was hidden, often accompanied by a sense of revelation.

I don’t abide much by the Christian Translation of the word apocalypse, but I very much identify with its source, the ancient Greeks. For years I have believed we were facing the “great uncovering“ and obviously that is what we are seeing accelerating today. Much of what the billionaires, Musk and Donald J Trump are accomplishing is to uncover trends that have been going on for decades And what we see uncovered is nothing but greed and contempt for compassion.

Although the daily news is startling and depressing, one has to accept that when the Trump administration is over we will have a giant pile of ashes, and it is up to us. “we the people,“ to build a new government, a new economy, and a compassionate caring society.

If you would like a peek at what that might look like and what people are discussing for the next level of economics and governance, please visit.

https://open.substack.com/pub/crisistransition/p/democracy-at-the-edge?r=bj2wi&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web&showWelcomeOnShare=false

Expand full comment
Harvey Kravetz's avatar

Maybe a bunch of new laws to prevent a trump and the massive corruption and self-dealing. And promise to permanently repair our relationships with our allies. Putting teeth into laws to prevent this kind of disaster from happening again.

Expand full comment
Marian Goldsmith's avatar

It seems writing better laws makes sense but perhaps even more important is putting and keeping people in positions to support and uphold those or any "publicly beneficial" ( in the truest sense; sorry to be so vague; I'm no philosopher or politician) laws. Clearly that's been lacking 'til now and seriously if not desperately needed despite some good and good faith attempts by members of the legal world.

Expand full comment
Karen Jacob's avatar

We need the impossible. We need a Constitutional amendment which will NOT allow anyone with a felony to be president.

Expand full comment
Mona Ross's avatar

Thank you for that. Thoughtfully written. Uncovering what was hidden, accompanied (hopefully) by an sense of revelation to all of us.

Expand full comment
Donald Twaddle's avatar

Don't you find it odd that little, or almost none, of this uncovered greed and contempt is found among the billionaires?

Expand full comment
Marian Goldsmith's avatar

Not off. A very very old story.

Expand full comment
Hiro's avatar

How many will perish till your time arrives?

Expand full comment
Cindy Gailey's avatar

Christy'[s remarks are so true. Love the remark "A disempowered public is a manageable one." We have the power. USE IT!

Expand full comment
Ned McDoodle's avatar

Waiting for 2026 will be like waiting for Godot.

Expand full comment
Stephanie Banks's avatar

And we know how futile that was for Vladimir and Estragon.

Expand full comment
Ned McDoodle's avatar

At least those two had a hope, albeit never consummated.

Expand full comment
James Quinn's avatar

I admire Bill’s capacity for hyperbole. But I might remind him that, to update an old saying to the level of correct political correctness, 'the plus size lady ain’t sung yet’.

Expand full comment
Bill Katz's avatar

And as we say here in New England, “Ahup.”

Expand full comment
James Quinn's avatar

In July of 1956, when I was eleven, I had occasion to climb Katahdin with a classmate and his father. While enjoying the snack we’d brought up with us, we saw a DC-3 letting down between us and North Brother for somewhere east of us. And we were just a bit higher than it was. I remember thinking then that anything must be possible. A boy’s whim, but there are still moments, even now.

Expand full comment
Linda Preston's avatar

Specify “planes exploding”: where, when? Thanks!

Expand full comment
Stephanie Banks's avatar

Because the great leader does not want anyone or anything to be smarter than he.

Expand full comment
Skepticat's avatar

My cats and the chair I'm sitting on are smarter than he is. Much nicer too.

Expand full comment
Bill Katz's avatar

I’ll “Meow” that.

Expand full comment
Skepticat's avatar

Puuurrrrrr

Expand full comment
Ned McDoodle's avatar

I agree and I am a dog partisan! 😉

Expand full comment
Stephanie Banks's avatar

My horse had much more sense and intelligence than his band of loyalists.

Expand full comment
Skepticat's avatar

Woof!

Expand full comment
NLTownie's avatar

We all should paws and reflect on that.

Expand full comment
Ned McDoodle's avatar

" . . . . the land of the greed and the home of knaves."

Expand full comment
Mona Ross's avatar

! I saw a quote the other day: the government is where all the problems that the private sector can't solve go. If they can't profit from it, the private sector shrugs its shoulders and sends it down the line. IMHO, capitalism in its extreme will not take care of anyone but business owners and executives.

Expand full comment
Ned McDoodle's avatar

Interesting thought. I will have to chew the cud on it. Thank you, Mona.

Expand full comment
Dee's avatar

Orange idiot is a loser, no brain dumbass

Expand full comment
Virginia Witmer's avatar

? Stephanie Banks do you mean Putin? Surely you can’t mean his useful idiot who can’t think beyond his hairdo and makeup.

Expand full comment
Stephanie Banks's avatar

Yes, I meant Putin. Of course Orban is bad, but he has not invaded an innocent country to expand his empire. Thank you for the correction.

Expand full comment
lauriemcf's avatar

Agree completely. I used to be an in-house lawyer for Columbia. I am so disappointed in them for their capitulation.

Expand full comment
Peaceful Protester's avatar

Linda, this is an excellent statement! Thank you! I, as a high school educated senior citizen, wasn’t aware colleges had a code of ethics! (Why would I ? And dont worry, I am not self-deprecating , I am very smart!) To your point, if they could somehow hold the alumni to account for that code, it could go a long way to help .

Expand full comment
Linda Weide's avatar

Yes. The threat of losing the degrees that these hypocrites claim comes from woke institutions that they are trying to destroy, should make them think twice. At some point, backing Trump is going to be like staying on a sinking ship.

Expand full comment
Marc Nevas's avatar

Actually, the ship is sinking. But, meanwhile, the media system blaring from the speakers on the ship, is telling the passengers that it is completely safe and actually rising up higher out of the water due to the skill and caring of its captain.

Expand full comment
Stephanie Banks's avatar

Former and current governors like Kevin Walker of Wisconsin, DeSantos of Florida and I believe one from the Midwest (who claimed no one needs to study French or its literature. What? I was a French major and put it to good use at a French bank on Wall Street.) The new mantra is STEM - so the humanities have been woefully underfunded as a result.

Expand full comment
Susan Stone's avatar

As I understand it, STEM was created to get more minority students involved in those disciplines, which, IMO is a good thing. That said, I believe that all disciplines are valuable. Variety is the spice of life.

Expand full comment
Linda Weide's avatar

I agree that variety and rounded ness is part of a good education. STEM and then STEAM were created to also get girls into those fields, but the way it was done was to over-focus on that and imply that you are only bright if that is what you are good at. You don't add one and dump the other the way that has been done. Still, I am not going to go into a rant on education, American and other, because it is in danger of being anything at all in the US. Who does that? Fascists.

Expand full comment
Skepticat's avatar

That point was January 20, 2025.

Expand full comment
Susan Stone's avatar

Peaceful Protester, I am a college graduate, and I didn't know that. Linda's comments are always educational.

Expand full comment
Patty Dubin's avatar

That's what Trump wanted besides his name everywhere, he wanted to steal their endowment!

Expand full comment
Brown Cecelia Linda's avatar

It’s not about finding waste it about where can they steal money and power from.

Expand full comment
Ron Boyd (Denver)'s avatar

Linda Weide Linda on Life Abroad -- "𝐼 𝑎𝑚 𝑔𝑙𝑎𝑑 𝑡ℎ𝑎𝑡 𝐻𝑎𝑟𝑣𝑎𝑟𝑑 𝑖𝑠 𝑐𝑜𝑢𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑇𝑟𝑢𝑚𝑝 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑐𝑎𝑛 𝑡𝑎𝑘𝑒 ℎ𝑖𝑚 𝑜𝑛 𝑤𝑖𝑡ℎ 𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑖𝑟 50 𝑏𝑖𝑙 𝑑𝑜𝑙𝑙𝑎𝑟 𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑜𝑤𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡."

Yes, Harvard can use its endowment... but it’s complicated.

Yes, Harvard has an enormous endowment (about $50 billion), but it's not like a checking account. Most of that money is earmarked for specific things like:

• Scholarships and financial aid

• Faculty salaries

• Research in particular areas

• Maintenance of buildings, libraries, museums, etc.

So, while Harvard has a lot of money on paper, it can’t freely repurpose all of it to cover anything it wants — like a sudden loss of federal research grants.

How else could Harvard respond?

• Bridge funding: Harvard might use unrestricted endowment returns or other funds to temporarily keep key research labs and projects alive.

• Private funding: The university might ramp up fundraising from donors, foundations, or corporations to replace some federal support.

•Political advocacy: Harvard and peer institutions have powerful lobbying arms. They would push back hard through Congress, media, and public campaigns.

In any event, the optics of attacking elite universities may play well to some bases, but it opens up big constitutional and institutional risks for any administration trying it.

Expand full comment
Dave Conant - MO's avatar

Good points, but the value of Harvard's endowment is in the investments that make it up. Through those, and the voting rights they confer, Harvard can influence Boards of Directors and business executives, many of whom are alumni, to put pressure on Trump & Co. and possibly bring about some change.

Expand full comment
Jon Rosen's avatar

So for me the question remains. Why should private educational institutions expect ANY funding at all from the government? Why shouldn't government funding be aimed at public institutions? This should be true for research as well as for idiotic things like giving government grants to support religious schools and their prayer books!

For me, government doesn't belong in those areas, period. We have strayed so far from having colorblind, agnostic public institutions it is sad. Government funds should be used to support institutions that provide fair and equal access to ALL people, not given out to institutions that provide biased access to certain groups whether that is based in religion, gender, race or even academic superiority. Support should be provided only to public institutions that offer equality of services to all.

Expand full comment
Dick Montagne's avatar

You are wrong Jon, the government is needed precisely in areas that don’t have great economic potential, like rare childhood diseases where there will be no chance of recouping development costs. The knowledge gained from that research may well lead to other solutions to ancillary problems. The government does have a place at the research table that public companies have no incentive to take part in, the government is there representing all of us.

Expand full comment
Jon Rosen's avatar

You are completely misreading what I said. I do NOT oppose using government funds to fund ANYTHING that you suggested in fact i urge it. I just believe that funding should go to PUBLIC institutions not PRIVATE ones.

This is not about keeping research from being done, I urge ALL research to be funded, just NOT at Harvard or Stanford. If those schools choose to become public institutions I would be thrilled to fund them equally to all other public institutions but they want to keep and protect their endowments and investment like any private company.

We have plenty of institutions scraping for money that we don't need to give it to the Harvard's of the world who have their own multi billion dollar endowments.

Expand full comment
Ron Boyd (Denver)'s avatar

Jon Rosen -- "𝑆𝑜 𝑓𝑜𝑟 𝑚𝑒 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑟𝑒𝑚𝑎𝑖𝑛𝑠. 𝑊ℎ𝑦 𝑠ℎ𝑜𝑢𝑙𝑑 𝑝𝑟𝑖𝑣𝑎𝑡𝑒 𝑒𝑑𝑢𝑐𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑎𝑙 𝑖𝑛𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑡𝑢𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑠 𝑒𝑥𝑝𝑒𝑐𝑡 𝐴𝑁𝑌 𝑓𝑢𝑛𝑑𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑎𝑡 𝑎𝑙𝑙 𝑓𝑟𝑜𝑚 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑔𝑜𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑛𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡?"

Think about it.

There are several reasons why the U.S. government gives funding to institutions like Harvard, even when they clearly don’t need the money in a survival sense:

1. Federal Research Grants

The majority of federal money going to Harvard isn’t a blank check—it’s typically earmarked for research. The government (through agencies like the NIH, NSF, and DoD) funds research across universities because of the high-quality work produced there. Harvard happens to attract top-tier researchers, which makes it a hub for government-backed research projects in medicine, science, defense tech, AI, etc.

It's like the government saying: “𝑊𝑒 𝑛𝑒𝑒𝑑 𝑐𝑢𝑡𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑔-𝑒𝑑𝑔𝑒 𝑐𝑎𝑛𝑐𝑒𝑟 𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑒𝑎𝑟𝑐ℎ—ℎ𝑒𝑟𝑒’𝑠 𝑎 𝑔𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑡 𝑡𝑜 𝑓𝑢𝑛𝑑 𝑦𝑜𝑢𝑟 𝑙𝑎𝑏.”

2. Student Financial Aid

Some federal funding also goes toward student aid programs—like Pell Grants or federal student loans—which follow students wherever they go. If a low-income student chooses Harvard, the government still contributes to their education through these aid programs. So in this case, the money isn’t really for Harvard, it’s for the student.

3. Indirect Costs

When the government funds a research project, they also pay overhead costs (known as indirect costs) to keep the lights on, literally—lab space, administration, maintenance, etc. Some criticize these as too generous, but they’re a standard part of federal research funding across all schools, not just Harvard.

But, the real question is, why isn't this funding spread out to smaller institutions. A question for another time, perhaps.

Expand full comment
Susan Still's avatar

Sometimes that funding is spread out across a wide swath of institutions, both large and small, public and private. Consider the zebra fish. NIH has a massive zebra fish facility (my brother helped design its filtration system) with thousands of individual tanks controlled by individual researchers. Each tank represents a different field of experimental inquiry- genetic, regeneration, systemic. And the list goes on. Zebra fish can regrow amputated parts like lungs or heart atria, allowing the researchers to study the evolution of a condition across multiple generations in a short time span.

Studies of some diseases need to be conducted across multiple clinics to get the requisite number of cases to validate or disqualify a particular thesis.

Stopping one study at a Harvard or a Columbia probably could have a devastating effect at a UAB or a UW or a UM if the institutions were investigating in tandem.

Expand full comment
James Quinn's avatar

In a Republic, I cannot think of any better purpose for government funding than educating the electorate, no matter in what area as long as it is open to all students and not affiliated with religious or other purely partisan entity.

Expand full comment
Jon Rosen's avatar

I strongly oppose the use of public funds for any kind of private education because in fact private schools are NOT "open to all " but are rather subject to selective processes. For instance even Harvard still grants "legacy" preference to people whose parents went there and give lots of money to the school and Harvard has the right to use any money it receives that is not otherwise allocated for whatever it chooses.

Public institutions are not free to do such things as they are required by law to act in certain ways (although the current system which permits state systems to create different biases in public educating is also bad and we need a truly federalized system IMHO )

in any case I oppose the use of public money for private education of any kind including private universities as well as private primary and secondary schools including religious schools.

Expand full comment
Dave Conant - MO's avatar

That's a separate question Jon, and one worthy of serious discussion. In the meantime, we have the system as it is and Trump's piecemeal revenge based approach is clearly inappropriate as well as largely ineffective.

Expand full comment
Linda Weide's avatar

Which is why my daughter goes to a public uni in another country that does not charge tuition. That is a whole other discussion. This is a piece I wrote on it.

https://lindaweide.substack.com/p/study-abroad?r=f0qfn

Expand full comment
Donald Twaddle's avatar

I could have gotten a Master's Degree for free at Muencher Freiheits Universitaet, but 3 weeks at a Goethe Institute in Grafing bei Muenchen was a good second place!

Expand full comment
Linda Weide's avatar

One could better pressure Trump if he were in his right mind. A lot of his governing, which is not much, is done on a whim.

Expand full comment
Ron Boyd (Denver)'s avatar

Dave, which is what I meant by "Political Advocacy."

Expand full comment
Linda Weide's avatar

I know that funds are restricted, but fortunately they are getting new funds as they have taken on this fight. I still think that they can use many monies for many things and take this on, because they are protecting those things. In fact, they can always ask the donors if they may use their money otherwise, except for anonymous donors of course. I do think that they should set up going forward a removal of degree if people dishonor the university. That is broad and acceptable. I would already take it from anyone in the Trump administration, or government that is supporting these anti-education actions.

Expand full comment
Emily Pfaff's avatar

Linda Weide,

Wise words ....as Americans, we must act! We have seen enough. Our amazing country is being destroyed for money and power ie placed in the fists of SELECT PERSONS. For how many days will this "fake " leadership be maintained and fed!!!!

A "wise code of ethics" is needed and we will not find it honored within the minds and hearts of many of our leaders.

Actions are being taken to hijack our education system, our monetary system, exchange truth for lies in the areas of scientific research, lies spread regarding health care, as well as the care of our earth.....quick acquisition of money with transfer into the pockets of billionaires.

Truth, wisdom, the care of our earth, the future and nourishment of our children ie mental, emotional and physical is being wiped out. Those in need throughout the world are experiencing abandonment...more poverty and starvation as we turn our backs on those in need.

We are allowing truth to be exchanged for lies....we are aiding and facilitating the "rule" of one man, Donald Trump!!! This weak fool is being allowed to take over this country with the vision of including The Panama Canal, Mexico, Greenland and Canada.

That is his goal...to rule the world...one country at a time.

I am so grateful for the courage shown by the populations and leaders within our world.

I am saddened that any country including China, should have to spend time and resources defending themselves from so many tariffs. There is a better way for all to benefit....ways of working together that would benefit the world...NOT just one man.

Those who chose Donald Trump...put him into office ....."brainwashed" his followers....and are using them to ruin the goodness and strength of this great nation.

I never hear this administration talking about the education of our children except how to control the education system. Trump and his minions must be worshipped. They are the authoritarians who choose the books our children will read and the science we will follow regarding the health of our children.

The leaders and workers within every agency of education, science, monetary...etc will be led by a Trump appointee. They will comply with the KING or "lose their head". Is this the way you want to continue, examine yourselves because THIS IS THE WAY WE ARE GOING!

Expand full comment
James Quinn's avatar

That famously ugly ex-soldier and sculptor who haunted the Athenian agora 2400 years ago asked, “How should men live?”

Our Founders answered with the Constitution, the first time in history a nation had defined itself at its inception. For me, their challenge was quite straightforward. We were designed to be that nation in which ‘We the People’ might together find enough of the courage, the understanding, the honesty, the tolerance, the compassion, the humility, the wisdom, the humor, the hope, and the sheer common sense to rule ourselves from the bottom up with as much equity and justice as humanly possible. I don’t suppose that constitutes an ethical code, but then the Constitution is based on a very pragmatic understanding of human nature, not anyone’s ethical standards.

Expand full comment
Marlene Lerner-Bigley (CA)'s avatar

Linda, I have had that same thought re: rescind those degrees of the many Repub cowards who claim that the lives of their families and of themselves are more important than ours.

Expand full comment
Bill Katz's avatar

That’s interesting. Could a degree actually be rescinded? Fascinating. I guess Orange Turd could have hiss Wharton degree rescinded but it like is full of D’Souza and F’s for tge subjects he took. Seeing the transcript would be lovely.

Expand full comment
Linda Weide's avatar

It could be a great way that the education system could contribute to the overhaul of the political system. I think nothing ventured nothing gained. It would at least force all these people who are attacking education to admit to the public that they have degrees from these institutions, and that they value them.

Expand full comment
RJVonnegut's avatar

Cancelling degrees awarded by Harvard to injure them for their political views is nonsense and even if it could be done it would amount to nothing less than an unlawful attack on free speech, i.e. very fascist, ignorant and Trumpian.

Expand full comment
Linda Weide's avatar

I respectfully disagree. It would force them to expose their hypocrisy. If they complain they will be publicly acknowledging that they value the degrees that they pretend to their un college educated constituents they don't.

Expand full comment
Donald Twaddle's avatar

Sounds great, but wouldn't doing that just make us Mensheviks instead of Bolsheviks?

Expand full comment
Susan Fernbach's avatar

Did you attend? 😏

Expand full comment
Bill Katz's avatar

D not D’Souza cheeses.

Expand full comment
Susan Fernbach's avatar

🤔

Expand full comment
Cindy La Ferle's avatar

One of my doctors, a highly regarded specialist, told me last week that he is applying for citizenship in another country -- and that a shocking number of his colleagues (including some researchers) are considering the same. He said that Trump's politics are going to impact the "medical community" in ways we haven't even seen yet, but are soon to take place. I was shocked, but then again, why am I surprised? This gifted doctor is relatively young and has a family, and has no problem starting fresh, where medicine is practiced without the bizarro government threats that we are starting to see in the U.S.

All I can say is, I hope the Trumpers who remain in this country are prepared to do their own heart surgery with whatever tools they have in the shed/

Expand full comment
Stephanie Banks's avatar

That last sentence is priceless. And while they're at it, clean up after their tornadoes and floods, because FEMA ain't gonna be there.

Expand full comment
JK's avatar

What? They have hearts?!

Expand full comment
Cindy La Ferle's avatar

Good point! :-)

Expand full comment
Stephanie Banks's avatar

LOL at that one!

Expand full comment
Linda Weide's avatar

I have been saying since Roe v. Wade was overturned that we are going to see doctors leaving Red States and not just abortion doctors, med students going to blue states, and ultimately I see hospitals shutting down and doctors because getting rid of medicaid is going to cut back on so much funding for health care. I expect people to go to other countries, since there is a shortage of doctors everywhere.

Expand full comment
Cindy La Ferle's avatar

Linda, you're exactly right. That's what I'm hearing.

Expand full comment
Virginia Witmer's avatar

Most particularly, Ms. Weide, Duke University needs to divest Stephen Miller of his degree. But then it is a “tobacco university” so what can we expect?

Expand full comment
Dave Conant - MO's avatar

I like the idea of rescinding degrees for people who don't meet the standards under which they were conferred. Might wake some up, would certainly scare the bejeebers out of a few.

Expand full comment
MLMinET's avatar

Is that even possible? It seems like most of the bad actors in the gov (including C Thomas) are Harvard or other Ivies alums. What do they teach there?

Expand full comment
Linda Weide's avatar

I have read in 2 places and seen in a film on rape on campus that at Yale the men say, "No means yes, and yes means anal."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Hunting_Ground

Do you think I would want my daughter going there? It smacks of entitlement. Entitlement to harm women because of the kind of Freedom that is discussed in Freedom's Dominion by Jefferson Cowie. The freedom for White males to have dominion over others.

Expand full comment
RJVonnegut's avatar

I am appalled to read this comment here…skip the Yale slagging and turn your ire on the Supreme Court and rapist Trump where it belongs.

Expand full comment
Linda Weide's avatar

Watch the movie The Hunting Ground. It is shocking.

Here is an article discussing what I said.

https://www.thefire.org/cases/yale-university-fraternity-suspended-five-years-intimidating-satirical-chant

https://www.businessinsider.com/yale-delta-kappa-epsilon-2018-1

https://msmagazine.com/2011/05/18/yale-bans-no-means-yes-fraternity-for-five-years/

I really don't need you mansplaining to me what my politics should be. I am a feminist and this is part of why my daughter is going to uni abroad. It is the culture of "this is not really a problem," well the Supreme court upholding laws that permit this sort of misogynist culture might be a problem, it is also found in the so called elite Unis that form these people and credential them. Trump is part of a culture in the US, the culture that many people are sick and tired of. These men are rapists too. The courts are filled with people formed by these cultures, that finds a fraternity gets 5 year ban instead of something that might change the culture. Like expulsion of the members from the Uni, and degrees conditional on not committing crimes like these.

Expand full comment
Bill Katz's avatar

Or… or… “Yes means anal” could mean male on male. Beats me. Coming from Yale.

Expand full comment
Linda Weide's avatar

Bill, without getting into the particular possibilities, it is a cry of male entitlement over another person's body without feeling the need for consent. Be it rape of females or males it is about a horrid sense of entitlement. The entitlement to possess someone else that is discussed in Freedom's Dominion by Jefferson Cowie. Not the freedom that respects other people having dominion over themselves.

Expand full comment
Linda Weide's avatar

I think it is possible to say we can remove your degree if you don't follow a code of conduct afterwards in which you gain work using this degree. Also, I think they should try it and see what Trump can do about it.

Expand full comment
Ellen's avatar

I read this morning that Harvard alum Stefanik has requested a federal investigation of the Saratoga Springs (NY) City School District over allegedly "woke" or DEI policies. Doesn't she have anything better to do than to get involved in local school district matters?? I'd love to see Harvard call her out.

Expand full comment
Linda Weide's avatar

She can't take her upset out at being pulled from the ambassador job on Trump, so she has to take it out on the helpless children. She is showing us that she is one of Madman Trump's Madwomen.

Expand full comment
Bill Katz's avatar

It would be a humorous moment if they had their degrees pulled. All the way back to grade school. Well, the Kindergarten advancement would be pulled as well. Then the doctor who pulled these future piglets out of the womb should correct the birth certificate with a “ Unsure of human qualities” clause.

Expand full comment
Janet Brook's avatar

Bill, this made me laugh out loud! Thanks for the very accurate imagery.

Expand full comment
James Quinn's avatar

IMO, we should start by rescinding the elections of those Republican senators who refused to convict Trump after January 6th.

Expand full comment
Beth Holloway's avatar

If Harvard rescinds degrees they would be doing much the same as trump is doing. Bullying. Not necessary to take away degrees. Maybe shame them by publicizing them?

Expand full comment
Barbara Leamer's avatar

That would be the easiest thing to do. If Harvard is attacked by Trump, put out a list of the members of Congress, Supreme Court, etc. who are Harvard graduates. Maybe even poll them for their opinions!

Expand full comment
Linda Weide's avatar

If it is bullying it is showing that these people are hypocrites. They tear down an institution. If someone threatens your family with a gun do you let them shoot you or do you fight back? If that is bullying than so be it. I prefer to think that the best defense is attack. That is what I was taught when I played soccer and I see that as a metaphor for this. Do not take it lying down!

Expand full comment
Karen Jacob's avatar

I wonder if like-minded donors would be upping their donations.

Expand full comment
Linda Weide's avatar

I have read that the moment Harvard took a stand against the bullying that donations flooded in. Let us hope that every graduate that truly values this country sent them money.

Expand full comment
Lois W. Halbert's avatar

Applaud Harvard

Expand full comment
Sophie Nusslé's avatar

It’s more than extortion: it’s an attempt at authoritarian control of a private institution without legal authority.

Expand full comment
Constance McCutcheon's avatar

That is definitely the objective. You’re right. And it is so scary.

Expand full comment
Ricardo Grinbank's avatar

Sophie, you need two to Tango, an attempt at authoritarian control and an institution run by irresponsible cowards. That's the reality at Columbia .

Expand full comment
Sophie Nusslé's avatar

Well, it's the reality at Columbia (although I hear it was pushing back now that Harvard has lifted the standard of resistance), but it's not the only reality of authoritarian rule: should Trump decide to throw his paramilitaries and groups of loyalist bureaucrats at a university, then unless the local police is prepared for an all-out battle, the university can be taken over by force.

Expand full comment
Linda Weide's avatar

I also hear that the Trump government asked Columbia's partner school Barnard's faculty to fill out some form saying whether they are Jewish, Pro-Israel, zionist and so on... Scary, scary, and I hope no one filled it out.

Expand full comment
Brown Cecelia Linda's avatar

Ricardo. I think it’s also about the cowards in the repuglicans party

Expand full comment
lauriemcf's avatar

For the party that demonizes George Soros to be claiming to be fighting anti-semitism is pretty rich.

Expand full comment
Laurie's avatar

And the party that says "good people on both sides," referring to those chanting "Jews will not replace us." They don't care about anti-Semitism one whit.

Expand full comment
Michele's avatar

Indeed, they do not I grew up in the midwest where there was considerable antisemitism and actually anti anything not WASP.

Expand full comment
George Comcast Email's avatar

tRump has been spouting antisemitic as well as racist garbage since he was an adolescent, if not before. It’s one of his brightest ideas for retribution to turn Title VII (civil rights act) prohibitions against the very institutions that practice DEI & tolerance.

Expand full comment
Michele's avatar

lauriemcf, Pfft. The antisemitism excuse is so lame. Antisemitism is as much a part of the hatred of others as anything else. Did we see any supportive comments after the arsonist torched the state home of Governor Shapiro. Then there is Gangrene basically celebrating the death of the Pope because he was too woke. These people, are a bunch of soulless ghouls looking to making us an all white Christian theocracy. And is death star really going to attend the funeral of the Pope. He will bring nothing but bad energy the opposite to what the Pope tried to achieve.

Expand full comment
Brown Cecelia Linda's avatar

Michele. If Death Star shows up maybe it will be like Simon who fell off his high horse and was converted. One can hope!

Expand full comment
Michele's avatar

He has such bad energy and of course, a very large secret service retinue. I hope he just does more than fall off a horse like maybe just drop dead. He reminds me of a principal I once had who always showed up even thought he knew he was not wanted. It was about him as is everything death star does. I do not want this Pope's funeral to be tainted. Bad enough that he spent some of his last moments with the odious Vance.

Expand full comment
NLTownie's avatar

I have a vision of Trump lurching smugly into the funeral service and Pope Francis rising from the dead to denounce him as the anti-

Christ. Can you even imagine how Fox would report that?

Expand full comment
Michele's avatar

LOL. What an image. I will be thinking about that one for a long time.

Expand full comment
J L Graham's avatar

A rational connection? No one can.

Expand full comment
Craig Gjerde's avatar

A Russian connection?

Expand full comment
Russell John Netto's avatar

The rational connection is that it's a convenient pretext for imposing their will on what they see as a haven for liberal elitism and for deporting activist students and faculty.

Expand full comment
Michele's avatar

Russell, we now have two students here in Oregon who were ordered to deport, one from England, who are now suing the government. They were both very near to getting their degrees and one is working on wildfire problems. So, we now have a situation where no one will come here if they want to make sure that they can finish their education. I am wondering too about college athletes from all over. And why vacation here when we have Customs acting like jackboots even with American citizens who happen to be on the wrong train, the wrong airport, or driving in the wrong place.

Expand full comment
Michele's avatar

Just got a favorable ruling from a judge.

Expand full comment
Virginia Witmer's avatar

How to get rid of Homan? He is obviously a Kommandant from the movies only cruel without thought.

Expand full comment
Stephanie Banks's avatar

I believe the furor is over the fact that some students correctly asserted in their protests that Palestinians have rights too. Does anyone think that Netanyahu influenced Trump's agenda toward Israel? A while back Foreign Affairs listed the 4 most dangerous leaders: Trump, Netanyahu, Xi Ping and Orban. I have several Jewish friends who detest Netanyahu. I am against certain US policies; that doesn't make me anti-American or anti-white people, or whatever nonsense one wishes to fabricate.....

Expand full comment
Ned McDoodle's avatar

Trump is using anti-Semitism as a cover story for isolating and then stifling dissent.

Expand full comment
Stephanie Banks's avatar

Totally agree with you.

Expand full comment
Michele's avatar

I am sure that Bibi is delighted with what we are doing. I am disgusted by what Israel is now doing in Gaza. It looks like the Israelis are reducing it to complete rubble, so that death star can make the area into a resort. And people have the right to speak for Palestinians. I know several people who are absolutely appalled by what is happening there. We need to be able to speak against wrongs wherever they occur and whoever is perpetuating them.

Expand full comment
Dale Rowett's avatar

Often, when the subject of U.S. policy toward Israel comes up, I feel it's necessary to review how we got to where we are. So let's go back to the beginning.

Jewish scribes who wrote various books in the Hebrew Scriptures (aka The Old Testament) inserted an alleged pronouncement from Jehovah declaring that (coincidentally) the Israelites were God's "chosen people." Further, that God would favor any nation that favors Israel (coincidentally), and would punish any nation that is mean to Israel. Centuries later, Christian gentiles who interpreted the Judaic scriptures literally carried forward this belief that God will protect friends of Israel.

From the founding of the U.S., Christians have had an outsized influence on U.S. government policy, including the nation's relationship with Israel, which has turned out to be unique, compared to U.S. relations with other countries. Israel has typically received U.S. financial aid that is disproportionate to its strategic or economic value to U.S. interests. Moreover, when Israel's leadership engages in actions that would be considered aggressive or against International Law if carried out by any other nation, the U.S. Government looks the other way at a minimum, or provides resources to carry out those bad actions.

Among American Christians, evangelicals have a peculiar relationship with the Jewish nation of Israel. They are all in on the "biblical lucky rabbit's foot" status of Israel, but condemn Jews for disclaiming that Jesus was their anticipated Messiah. This condemnation provides an opening for evangelicals' embrace of antisemitic attitudes, while claiming the opposite. Although cognitive dissonance is on-brand for evangelicals.

Expand full comment
Stephanie Banks's avatar

Michael Oren - an Israeli - wrote a History of the Middle East. Excellent research. However, it all began after we became untethered from England, when these new Americans travelled to the Middle East and insisted on converting the Arabs to Christianity -- without asking them what they wanted or thought. The story marches on until we come to Truman then Clinton when real negotiations started with Egypt and other countries. It has been fraught from the start. There's been treachery on both sides.....

Expand full comment
Dale Rowett's avatar

White American Christians have spent mind-boggling amounts of energy and money trying to force everyone else to do as they say.

Expand full comment
Virginia Witmer's avatar

Well done, Dale. The blindness and fear of evangelicals well elucidated. Thank you.

Expand full comment
Sharon's avatar

Don’t Republicans keep saying they want smaller government, less interference in our lives? When do they plan on implementing that? Seems they’re insinuating themselves in everything including our walking down the street what’re when they don’t like the color of you skin they’ll arrest you and hold you indefinitely, even if you prove you were born here.

Expand full comment
Maureen Osborne's avatar

"Harvard is suing the departments of Health and Human Services, Justice, Education, Energy, and Defense, the General Services Administration (GSA), the National Institutes of Health, National Science Foundation, NASA, and the leaders of those agencies." Now there's a very good use of those billions in endowment. Give 'em hell, Harvard!

Expand full comment
Virginia Witmer's avatar

Putin/Musk are running this. Trump takes orders for today’s distraction. Today’s is really Hegseth with a touch of Noem. We have to continue to make as much noise as possible until SCOTUS and the non-traitor Republicans get the picture.

Expand full comment
Ned McDoodle's avatar

These inexplicable demands embody a digital coup d'état, together with a dash for dictatorship, giving life to ling hidden revenge fantasies. If that is the not behavior of a psychopath write large, then nothing is. No wonder Baron von Blimpoman keeps 'Mein Kampf' of his night-stand.

Expand full comment
Patrick Hunter's avatar

https://www.straitstimes.com/world/united-states/republican-us-senator-murkowski-on-threat-of-trump-retaliation-we-are-all-afraid

This article quotes Lisa Murkowski: “We are all afraid,” I happened to see the original clip. She means the whole Congress.

We have rule by fear. This is a coup.

The data that is being stolen will allow complete control of the U.S. Apparently Russia is involved. This has been in the works for years.

Expand full comment
Constance McCutcheon's avatar

Their fear does not impress me, nor can I empathize with them. If they want to represent us, they must be greater than any fear they might have for themselves when facing a threat to our entire society and democracy. If they are so afraid that they cannot act to defend us, they must resign.

Expand full comment
Jon Rosen's avatar

Given how much I hate the Trump administration I have to say that i don't have a lot of sympathy with Harvard either. I have railed for years at the billions of government dollars literally funneled into private and religious educational institutions and Harvard is one of the worst.

I do NOT like the extortion that Trump is trying to inflict here, but I WOULD favor getting rid of ALL governmental support of private educational institutions at all levels. Governments shouldn't be supporting private institutions whether business or education.

Harvard has its $50B endowment and if it wants to fund its research, let it pay for it itself rather than use government funds on top of that. But that should go for ALL private education. No government support at all. Ever. This should apply to K-12 as well as secondary and college.

Expand full comment
Dale Rowett's avatar

Somehow, I can picture you grousing about the U.S. government refusing to provide funding to America's best and brightest student researchers, merely because they aren't attending a public university with lower academic standards.

Note: The funding is going to the STUDENTS conducting the research; the university is just providing a venue to conduct that research and faculty to facilitate it.

We would not have a majority of the technology we enjoy, were it not for government-funded research.

With that clarification, I agree that public funds should not be redirected to private and parochial schools teaching the lower grades.

Expand full comment
Jon Rosen's avatar

First of all there are FEW students doing research. Most research money goes to the professors who do it. Yes they probably pay students money to do work for them but the students aren't the ones doing the research most of the time.

And the reason lots of research is done at institutions like Harvard is historical. Those institutions for many decades for most of the public money and that let them grow their faculties and research colleges. If the distribution of money had been equitable all along there would be plenty more public institutions with great research centers.

In fact there are selected public institutions in some fields where this already happens. For av long time astronomy was not a huge research area and the private institutions ignored it. But the University of Arizona Did not and now they have one of the strongest PUBLIC astronomy research departments in the country.

All I advocate for is the recognition that the big private colleges take money that should be going to fund PUBLIC research. Let the state schools flourish with more funding and reduce or ultimately eliminate funding to schools like Harvard, simply because private education in this country should be exactly that. Private.

Expand full comment
RJVonnegut's avatar

…I suppose you are happy with the government giving huge contracts to Musk companies who use their communications tools and satellites to aid Putin with his invasion of Ukraine, right?

Expand full comment
Jon Rosen's avatar

Are you just ignorant or do you not read anything? I am actively opposed to almost everything Musk has his sticky little hand in. I say that repeatedly so maybe you should actually read what people write before making comments. Sigh...

Expand full comment
Virginia Witmer's avatar

Harvard can scarcely be called a “religious” institution. I don’t understand your jeremiad.

Expand full comment
Jon Rosen's avatar

If you actually read what i wrote it had nothing to do with religion although in fact Harvard IS historically a religious institution. That aside, I am opposed to providing PRIVATE institutions of ANY type with governmental funding, particularly for education. I believe public funding for education should go only to public institutions where the money can aid ALL citizens and not just a privileged few. How that clears things up.

Expand full comment
Cindy Gailey's avatar

No Shit! We don't need the government controlling any information a university has. Why? Extortion as you said.

Expand full comment
Lois W. Halbert's avatar

Exactly

Expand full comment
John  (NJ-VT)'s avatar

ANYONE THAT WRITES ALL IN CAPS IS NOT STABLE!!!

Expand full comment
Ricardo Grinbank's avatar

Little bit of humor in this stressful times is very welcome John. THANKS!!!!😁

Expand full comment
John  (NJ-VT)'s avatar

YOU ARE WELCOME! HAVE A NICE DAY!!!

John Irving used it for Owen Meany’s voice. Screaming and annoying.

It says allot about his mental state. The whole nation will be typing with ALL CAPS by 2028.

Expand full comment
GJ Loft ME CA FL IL NE CT MI's avatar

First it was cursive writing they took away and now the lower case letters. Is punctuation next?

Expand full comment
Sophie Nusslé's avatar

Punctuation died the death by a thousand tweets.

Expand full comment
MLMinET's avatar

Boy that’s for sure and it was on shaky leg’s to begin with (see what I did there?).

Expand full comment
Sophie Nusslé's avatar

ouch :-D

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment deleted
Apr 22
Comment deleted
Expand full comment
Dale Rowett's avatar

Also deceased: Proper capitalization, correct spelling and paragraphs.

Expand full comment
Stephanie Banks's avatar

Probably --- because the use of proper grammar is certainly in decline. If I have to read or listen to one more journalist or other professional misuse amount and number, less and fewer, I'm throwing something.

Expand full comment
Carol T Cox (NJ to VA to FL)'s avatar

I agree, Stephanie. The one that irks me the most is the misuse of "me" and "I" that I hear on a regular basis from people who should know better. On NPR even! As an example, it makes me cringe to hear people say "He told my wife and I." I scream out to the tv or radio "me not I." Or when people use "me" in the nominative, such as "Me and my boyfriend went to..." Such basic grammar! We couldn't graduate from 8th grade without knowing these rules. (That was a rural school in NJ in the late 50s.) I understand that people learning English as a second language might have problems understanding our pronoun rules, but I know several people who teach English as as second language, who do emphasize these things that help in basic communication skills.

Expand full comment
Camilla B. (GA)'s avatar

Carol, I attended public school in a small town in Georgia in the same time period as you. We share a lot of the same cringe points. 😖

Expand full comment
Susan Stone's avatar

I learned that stuff in Santa Monica, CA in the same time period. Plus my mother was the grammar police, and insisted that we use words correctly.

Expand full comment
J. Nol's avatar

There's just such an easy way to check it for oneself, by dropping the other noun and saying the sentence out loud. It has to sound wrong to most people to say "me went to the store. Or 'he told I". I too react with consternation especially when it's someone in the public eye who can't speak properly.

Expand full comment
Ellen's avatar

Don't forget "it's" for "its" and plural words with unnecessary apostrophes ("apostrophe's").

Expand full comment
Gail Adams VA/FL's avatar

Please add farther and further.

Expand full comment
J. Nol's avatar

How about lay and lie?

Expand full comment
Bill Katz's avatar

How about lose and loose.

Expand full comment
Stacy B's avatar

It’s also the people who use the word “like” every 5th word that annoy me; or raising the inflection at the end of every sentence. These aren’t exactly issues of journalism, but are issues I hear every day that also make me want to throw something.

Expand full comment
Stephanie Banks's avatar

I hope this doesn't offend anyone... but my husband calls me the Grammar Nazi.... because I correct print and TV and others (not to their face) all the time!!!

Expand full comment
Don Elliot's avatar

Kind of counterintuitive hitting the ‘like’ on this one, but, like, it’s, like, a flash flood these days. It would be interesting and disturbing to, like, rewrite the Gettysburg Address with, like, all the sh*tty grammar in vogue these days. ALL CAPS IN THE IMPORTANT PARTS. N

Expand full comment
sdo in Jax's avatar

Stephanie Banks—that bothers me, too. And I hear it a ton 😏

Expand full comment
Martin Reiter's avatar

Me Tarzan, you Jane.

Expand full comment
pilgrimRVW's avatar

Some people have already started doing this. It becomes harder and harder to understand the written word. What with that, the interchangeable use of they’re, there and their, and its and it’s, and other homonyms, spelling errors, etc, it takes a longer time than it should to construe a simple sentence. Run-on sentences, to which I am prone, don’t help either.

Expand full comment
John Gregory's avatar

no doubt creating messages by voice recognition exacerbates the misuse of homonyms - not taking the time to go back and check, and then the constant use of errors makes one not sure if they *are* errors .... alas.

Expand full comment
Doug G's avatar

Hegseth's team of incompetent likes emojis, maybe that's where we are headed.

Expand full comment
Daniel Solomon's avatar

The BIG news is that Don Bacon, R NE, is the first Republican member of Congress to ask for Hegseth's removal from office.Bacon is the chair of a House Armed Services subcommittee and one of just a handful of House Republicans in districts that Kamala Harris carried last year. He first made his comments to Politico. https://www.axios.com/2025/04/21/don-bacon-pete-hegseth-signal

Hopefully, this is the start of the Feathers of Hope scenario. https://jerryweiss.substack.com/

Where do the others on the committees stand?

Meanwhile there is pushback on tariffs, on Musk and his Muskovites, by Congressional Republicans.

Expand full comment
Doug G's avatar

Yes, Daniel, I had seen that yesterday about Bacon. Perhaps like dominoes, the convicted felon's supporters will fall away once they realize the insanity won't end. And I do believe that he is insane at this point -- his brain is disordered.

Expand full comment
Stephanie Banks's avatar

Right - they speak with cartoon characters instead of properly composed sentences.

Expand full comment
J. Nol's avatar

Perhaps because they're all in the clown car being evil cartoon characters.

Expand full comment
Jean in Florida's avatar

😆😆😆

Expand full comment
Anne Marie's avatar

Punctuation is already lost GJ

Expand full comment
horhai's avatar

The technofascists want AI to do ALL the typing by 2028...

Expand full comment
Ellen's avatar

AI is NOT always right.

Expand full comment
Linda Querry's avatar

loved A Prayer for Owen Meany. Maybe those believing in their own divine destiny scream in caps?

Expand full comment
J L Graham's avatar

The novelty is surely wearing thin??

Expand full comment
Jean Peters's avatar

ALL RED MAGA CAPS

Expand full comment
SAH Vashon's avatar

Is Elements of Style a banned book🧐😬?

Expand full comment
Michele's avatar

John, I hope not. I can't make myself use all caps.

Expand full comment
J L Graham's avatar

Much of the best humor carries a payload of truth.

Expand full comment
Carolyn's avatar

Good humor is very similar to lying, isn't it, yet different.

Expand full comment
J L Graham's avatar

Exactly. Often it's a twist of logic that is designed to be discovered, like the puns in Alice in Wonderland. Detection of the "lie" in the narrative makes it funny, such as Carroll's substitution of the word "lessen" for "lesson", or statements or depiction meant to be obvious exaggeration, with clearly no attempt to deceive. Thomas Nast's image of a man with a moneybag for a head is obviously not real; or is it? Real lies attempt to defraud.

Expand full comment
Camilla B. (GA)'s avatar

So much of Andy Borowitz’s best work carries that same payload.

Expand full comment
J L Graham's avatar

Or cartoons of "Tom Tomorrow". The final cartoon of Ann Telnaes for WaPo packed a little more truth than it's owner could handle.

Expand full comment
Sophie Nusslé's avatar

InDeed, sTABle GENIusEs WRitE liKe ThIS!!!

Expand full comment
Ned McDoodle's avatar

All CAPS = ALL CRAP 😉🤭🤫🙂🥳

Expand full comment
Ally House (Oregon)'s avatar

💩💩💩

Expand full comment
Ned McDoodle's avatar

You get an* A+++ on the Trump smell-test. 🤭 I get a D- (i.e., a gentleman's F} for spelling. 😉

Expand full comment
Martin Reiter's avatar

When computer keyboard manufacturers finally add a key with 3 exclamation points, it would save a lot of time.

Expand full comment
John  (NJ-VT)'s avatar

That’s good! True LOL. Thanks martin!!!

Expand full comment
George T's avatar

Good one! Too funny!

Expand full comment
Peaceful Protester's avatar

I wish there was a laughing emoji!!! Hahaha

Expand full comment
Ally House (Oregon)'s avatar

On my PC, if I hit "right click" at the top of my options is "emoji". They are similar to (but not as good as) the ones on my phone.

Or is that one's? Or ones'?

<sarcasm font>

Expand full comment
John  (NJ-VT)'s avatar

This is a nice recess from this troubled world. Wonder they did for WWII? I know it was pot and music during the troubled years of Vietnam.

Expand full comment
MLMinET's avatar

😂🤣😅

Expand full comment
Karen Jacob's avatar

I did that once on some platform and was censored-too angry.

Expand full comment
George Comcast Email's avatar

YOUR COMMENT IS PERFECT!!

Expand full comment
Michele's avatar

John, Well, if I yell, everyone will have to pay attention.

Expand full comment
John  (NJ-VT)'s avatar

YOU CAN’T FALSELY YELL FIRE TOO MANY TIMES!!!

Even the red hats are starting to see that. Especially ref hats with 401Ks.

Expand full comment
Patty. Dubin's avatar

No, just trying to make a point.

Expand full comment
Brown Cecelia Linda's avatar

😂🤣

Expand full comment
CRL's avatar

😄

Expand full comment
Carol S.'s avatar

The point of all of this is to make the government agencies so damaged and inefficient so there is an excuse to privatize everything. It is just another form of what Bain Capital did, buy companies and take them apart and sell them off. Who cares what it does to employees and pension plans, as long as the robber barons can take over and make tons of money. Having run out of private sector companies to destroy, these robber barons are looking to profit off the government and government services, at a very high cost to taxpayers. Ordinary Americans will see even more of the economy in the hands of the one percent by the time this is all over. We need to stop it now.

Expand full comment
Kazz McKnight's avatar

So 'Make America Great Again' equates to DOGE opening up interdimensional, highly sensitive data portals straight into Moscow’s inbox, and RumpRat plotting for the new RUMP card to replace the government’s $700 billion SmartPay system. Of course, there's nothing to see here. None of this is treasonous or corrupt. It’s just deeply misunderstood patriotism. Are you kidding me?? Someone call the cops.

Expand full comment
Stephanie Banks's avatar

Well, my husband received his social security check -- I DID NOT -- and they usually come together. Wrote to Jamie...

Expand full comment
Andrea Cherez's avatar

These people are gangsters robbing the country blind. Isn’t it about time for the military to round up the Don, his cabinet, heads of all govt agencies appointed by him, and the Heritage foundation and hold them until our law-abiding experts can return to assess the damage. Once the country is stabilized, we can deal with their crimes.

Expand full comment
Barbara Dambach's avatar

I am soo sorry to hear this! And now even more frightened for myself.

Expand full comment
Carol Fletez's avatar

I hope you don't mean an actual paper check since that has been winding down for quite some time. Electronic transfer does have electronic trails but once a paper check goes into the mail it's far more difficult to trace.

Expand full comment
Robot Bender's avatar

We have an account we only use for IRS/State/City taxes now. If something hits that account that shouldn't, we transfer it and make sure to reroute future payments to the other account. Not sure how much that will help if they start seizing accounts, but it's a start. We're already over halfway out of the stock market and assuming we'll lose our SS by the end of the summer.

I fully expect a full blown depression by the end of the year if nothing changes. Maybe sooner. IANA financial advisor, but I think most of the people in the market are assuming these are normal times. Uh uh. This won't be a classic depression. It's man made, which makes me think it will be far worse.

Expand full comment
Gail Nabity's avatar

I’m so very sorry, Stephanie Banks.

Expand full comment
Margaux Hull's avatar

It would seem obvious by now that DOGE's mission is not to root out waste and inefficiency. Mr. Trump is all about retribution. If a journalist, or commentator or common citizen and even those who comment on HCR's wonderful newsletters could find that their bank accounts frozen, Social Security is cut off, Medicare benefits gone. Musk has your social security numbers, he has your bank info and yup, he knows where you live. Mr. Trump has not hesitated with his perceived enemies about naming them with his mega phone and where you live.

Expand full comment
John Bruner's avatar

Unfortunately, "calling the cops" is not a usefult option anymore. The foxes now guard the henhouse. Can anyone really trust information coming from federal agencies anymore?

Expand full comment
Ned McDoodle's avatar

With Team Treason sitting atop up to five thousand nuclear weapons.

Expand full comment
GJ Loft ME CA FL IL NE CT MI's avatar

Carol, I disagree that the government agencies are "damaged and inefficient."

The SSA makes over 70 million payments a month. And they do it effectively without the requested level of staff. Every year Congress votes on a number of changes to the Federal tax code and the IRS programmers and staff have about a month to program those changes into the already heavily modified system. And every year, the Republicans vote to reduce the IRS budget just so the wealthy won't get audited and are forced to pay their fair share.

Expand full comment
Carol S.'s avatar

Correct, that is my point. IRS and SS are being deliberately attacked so that they do not function as intended so that becomes an excuse for private take over.

Expand full comment
GJ Loft ME CA FL IL NE CT MI's avatar

Gotcha, sorry I misinterpreted your comment. My bad.

Expand full comment
pilgrimRVW's avatar

I think her point was that DOGE, and cooperating people are sabotaging the formerly quite efficiently run agencies, to make them ripe to be taken over by private companies. That way the rich get even richer at disastrous cost to everyone else.

Expand full comment
MLMinET's avatar

What I don’t get is the data they are stealing (and the medical research being abandoned, etc.) affects Congress members and THEIR families too. How do they think they are protected from the damage?

Expand full comment
John Gregory's avatar

they get death threats from the MAGAts if they raise an eyebrow ... so they don't.

Expand full comment
Robot Bender's avatar

Hiding now will just push them down the list for elimination. He'll get to them sooner or later.

Expand full comment
Sophie Nusslé's avatar

Maybe it can be done twice: run the agency into the ground; privatise; load the new company with debt and transfer assets to another company just before selling on; crash; be nationalised at huge cost to taxpayer because essential and/or strategic services not happening.

It’s a scam that’s happened a few times in the UK: see under rail nationalisation and Thames Water (not yet renationalised but probably will have to be).

Expand full comment
Marcus Debon's avatar

Their not transferring the debt to another company. They’ll be transferring the debt to the American people.

The idea is to privatize the profits and dump the losses in the American people.

They will say a private company can do better but the whole thing will still be usbsizized by tax payers.

Think about it….they hand over the debt to”running” of the agency to a private entiti but still will be using the money allocated by congress. IT’S WHY they have’s asked Congress to “close” them. The American taxpayer is int going to be handed a check and they say, “good news, next year your taxes are going down 20% because we closed SS, the USPS, USAID,” etc. our taxes will still be the same. If not hirer and the billions going to these agencies will still go to them. The difference will be the CEO and shareholders will take their cut of profits and then ask for more money the following year.

DeJoy never severed ties completely with his private package delivery company. He was just waiting it out for either A GoP president or a majority in the Congress and senate. Now he has both. So he’ll most likely partner the USPS with his old comapny which will not only be given billions in tax dollars to run the USPS, with all profits going to DeJoy and its shareholders, yhey will literally have 315 MILLIONS customers. Wonder how much tat stock will rise.

Same thing for the private comapny chosen to run SS and student loans.theyll still get billions in government money to “run” the services which means these bankers no longer need to wine and dine and try to get retirees to invest with them. They’ll already have 315 MILLIONS customers customers they can treat anyway they want. And the profits will go to the CRo and the shareholders, who will not be considered to the taxpayer. And if they screw it uo like the housing and dot.com, theyll walk away with a government bailout. You think banks were too big to fail, try the entire US economy.

They’ve been trying this for years. And how they get the American people to go along is to say it’s inefficient and THEY can do better. Just like they’ve done so much better controlling healthcare costs with Medicare Part D or private insurance.

A private company’s dream to to attach to a government, get the contracts, the subsidies and be protected from losses while they squeeze the profits. It’s why K Street is so huge.

And of course, they’ll be hefty kick back to the guy who made it all happen. I’m guessing neither Bezos or Musk get to trillionaire first….itll be Trump through bribes.

Expand full comment
Sophie Nusslé's avatar

You misunderstood me.

There’s a scam that goes like this:

1. Privatise a state-owned organisation /agency, including its assets and liabilities.

2. The new owners then load the new company with new debt under the pretext of having to invest to bring the service up to date. They transfer the borrowed money to another company and don’t update the services.

3. They then sell on the heavily indebted company.

4. The company is then stripped of its most profitable assets to pay off the massive debt, but only pay off a part. At that point the second new owners ask for state subsidies to keep operating.

5. Finally, the company having become wholly dysfunctional and nearing bankruptcy, it is re-nationalised, including massive debt and minus the most profitable assets. (This final stage can happen after more forward sales, indebtedness and stripping by the private sector.)

Have a look at the history of Thames Water for an example..

Expand full comment
Susan Krsnich's avatar

The post office was just for practice …

Expand full comment
Ricardo Grinbank's avatar

Now it's not soon enough Carol.

Expand full comment
Marlene Lerner-Bigley (CA)'s avatar

If we were playing the game “BINGO”, you would’ve won the prize! Every one of these evil billionaire-ish people should be made to be stripped bare. By that, I mean that they lose all of their earnings and capital to replenish what they have stolen from us and the world. May we see real justice take over before we see our demise.

Expand full comment
JDinTX's avatar

You’ve been paying attention.

Expand full comment
Kathy Hughes's avatar

Muskrat also wants to spy on government employees who make less than complimentary remarks about dear leader on their spare time outside of work (doing so at work can run afoul of the Hatch Act, which Trump thinks he doesn’t have to follow. He also wants to prevent any efforts to collectively bargain in the public or private sectors.

Expand full comment
GJ Loft ME CA FL IL NE CT MI's avatar

What's to be done about Musk and Tesla? It seems that Trump is handing out contracts to Musk like candy at Halloween. Of course there are serious conflicts of interest here, but don't expect Bondi or Patel to do a thing about them.

Expand full comment
Kathy Hughes's avatar

That is a dilemma I’ve thought about, and Pam Bondi and Kash Patel won’t do their jobs.

Expand full comment
Ellen's avatar

I believe the courts can appoint special prosecutors, if the AG won't do the job.

Expand full comment
Daniel Solomon's avatar

Qui tam is possible.

AI, A "qui tam" provision, primarily associated with the False Claims Act (FCA), empowers individuals to bring lawsuits against those defrauding the government, with the potential to receive a share of any recovered funds.

The FCA provides that any person who knowingly submits, or causes to submit, false claims to the government is liable for three times the government's damages plus a penalty that is linked to inflation

This provision allows "whistleblowers," also known as "relators," to sue on behalf of the United States and, if successful, receive a portion of the recovery.

Expand full comment
Stephanie Banks's avatar

Would any of us commenting here ever be subject to criminal prosecution or other investigations?

Expand full comment
MLMinET's avatar

Maybe. Depends on whom we anger.

Expand full comment
Dutch Mike's avatar

Stasi pretty much? But it's unfair to compare the Mump regime to Hitler's nazi regime...

Expand full comment
Marcus Debon's avatar

My only issue with any comparison to Nazis is that I don’t think MAGA sees that as a negative or an insult.

I heard Seth Moulton make a reference to Nazis and he was absolutely right but I think he need eit realize…..many people in this country admire Nazis and Hitler which is why it is nauseating yhey have tried to goose step they way around the constitution on the back of antisemitism. I’m shocked more Jews haven’t demanded they stop using them for illegal and anti democratic scapegoating.

MAGA talks about Hitler and the Nazis as if THEY were just proud Germans being attacked by gypsies and Jews who were diseased and controlling all the money and they needed to stand up to those two entities. They have warped history so badly and I’m not even sure yhey get how dangerous the Nazi and fascists movements were to the world. I definitely do not think they ever draw the conclusive line from the fact the freedoms we have been afforded are quite opposite to what the Nazis wanted. I think we have been spoiled I. This country with the factb5at we can say anything we want without fear of government retaliation. Or we used to be able to. I also don’t think MAGA understand the difference between what Trumo is doing with religion and speech to “wokeism”.

Their reaction to wokeism was pretty strong. But yhey never understood the difference between the GOVERNMENT saying you can’t tell a woman, “nice ass” at work and your boss. The GOVERNEMTN has no right to do anything about you saying that or calling comeone the N word or a woman a C or a Jew a K. Has no right to tell you you cannot say “Jews will not replace us or Muslims saying River to the sea or calling Jews names.

They equated what was happening to them for being vile from their friends, neighbors and coworkers with a governemtn restricting free speech, they didn’t get the fact your neighbors are just as free to have NOTHING to do with as you are to EVERYTHING to do with the KKK. Free association. And your boss CAN fire you for using racial slurs and saying offensive stuff to their female employees. And comedians didn’t get that audiences could 100% not by tickets to your shows. That’s not censorship, it’s a consequence of actions. HUGE difference.

In Nazi Germany and the Trumo administration, if you now say something or write something etching, you are getting GOVERNEMTNT agencies succeed in you. Of course, it won’t and hasn’t held up in court because it’s illegal but it is still harassment by the GOVERNMENT. this isn’t your brother in law refusing to go to Thanksgiving bevause if your racist rants. This is the power of ten governemtn saying you cannot speak freely. And if you do, we I’ll punish you by freezing your assets.

Maybe universities handled Gaza protests wrong. Plenty didn’t but they was a fine line between LEGAL repulsive speech we dislike and physical harassment and destruction and trespassing. Many schools removed kids for trespassing, not speech bevause no matter how vile, you can say what you like in 99% of the cases ruled by SCOTUS.

Moulton can compare them to Nazis, they do have a lot in common. And I’m not against his ability to do it. I just think it’s ineffective in trying to sway people who admire a group that wouldn’t let Jews worship their religion, sewed stars on them confiscated their property and tried to annihilate them because they disagreed with their religion and thei speech. They simply didn’t like who they were and blamed them for their horrible lives. Just like they want to punish gays and women and minorities for how they are and their horrible lives. And they both worship the men who actually take their opportunities, steal all the resources and leave them to live on hate and fear. It get it. It’s easier.

Expand full comment
Susan Lynn Hollis Garrett's avatar

Why? They’re conducting themselves just the same.

Expand full comment
Dutch Mike's avatar

Yes they are. But they also like double standards and playing the victim.

Expand full comment
Dutch Mike's avatar

Yes. As Heather writes in the last paragraph: "“There’s a lot of money to be made by a new company coming in here,” said Hashmi. “But you have to ask: What is the problem that’s being solved?” " Well, the problem is that Muskolini STILL doesn't have enough money and influence. THAT is the problem he is fixing.

Expand full comment
Brenda Hynson's avatar

Carol S., you so nailed the goals of the one percenters! Will we wake-up in time? The call for peaceful demonstrations is now. More and more will be needed! Project 2025 has been underway for quite awhile. That is, too long.

Expand full comment
Avrohm Melnick's avatar

It’s called the “Shock Doctrine”! a book written by Naomi Klein who it would be nice to hear from substack. I think it’s also Chapter 13 from the secret Russian playbook.

Expand full comment
Robot Bender's avatar

Yup. Disaster (or vulture) capitalism.

Expand full comment
Ricardo Grinbank's avatar

The Pope died hours after his hand was touched by Vance. Coincidence?

Everything this regime touches dies.

Expand full comment
GJ Loft ME CA FL IL NE CT MI's avatar

If Vance was a Democrat, Fox News would announce, "Vance killed the Pope."

Expand full comment
Doug G's avatar

Gary, as I wrote elsewhere yesterday, during Francis' meeting with Trance, the pope whispered "God, just kill me now."

Expand full comment
Kevin Glyn Hearth Girard's avatar

You called it, that is how they'd be.

Expand full comment
Linda Mitchell, KCMO's avatar

The British news services reported that he refused to see JustaDick and had his assistant give him a lecture on compassion

Expand full comment
Gail Adams VA/FL's avatar

Couch boy had a photo op with the Pope. He (pontif) wasn’t at the formal meeting.

Expand full comment
MLMinET's avatar

Oh that’s good! I wonder if it’s true.

Expand full comment
Virginia Cutler's avatar

The Pope refused to die until he ensured JD Vance received instruction in the teachings of COMPASSION 👏

Expand full comment
Dave A.'s avatar

From former Washington Post wag, Gene Weingarten.

No, I don’t think JD Vance’s

Visit killed the fine Pope Francis,

(Whatever online wags might yelp.)

— But I’m pretty sure it didn’t help.

Expand full comment
Barney Lehrer's avatar

Wait until some evangelical MAGATs explain that God decided to use Vance as a way to kill a progressive pope.

Expand full comment
Kathy Hughes's avatar

The always classy MTG (a Catholic turned evangelical) suggested tastelessly that Pope Francis’s death was the death of evil. Au contraire, MTG.

Expand full comment
Patty Dubin's avatar

MTG want to see evil all she needs to do is look at her idols trump, vance, musk and look in any mirror. These villains are the face of evil. Lying, hating anyone not them, stealing funds and information, money laundering, insider trading, hurting people in America and the world, starving people, depriving people of education and trying to stop them from reaching their human potential, human trafficking. The list goes on and on. Oh, their judgement day is coming and mercy and sympathy we will not have.

Expand full comment
MLMinET's avatar

She was a Catholic??! OMG.OMGOMGOMG.

Expand full comment
Pax Linson's avatar

Yeah, I wish it was more transparent, though - I can't post it the way she phrases it..

Expand full comment
lauriemcf's avatar

Marjorie Taylor Gangrene has already gone there.

Expand full comment
Ned McDoodle's avatar

One of the few political analysts whom I trust, Jimmy Kimmel, had some choice words last evening. 😉

Expand full comment
Stephanie Banks's avatar

Right, I was waiting for someone to suggest that JD killed the Pope.

Expand full comment
George A. Polisner's avatar

Thank you Professor Richardson.

Here's an on point excerpt from an article I'm publishing later today:

A growing few in the GOP understand that when their billionaire donors lose wealth due to economic instability, hourly changes in tariff and trade policies, the rapidly declining value of the US dollar against the Euro and other currencies, when jobs are lost, and each new round of Trump/Musk/DOGE "government efficiency is unmasked to reveal newly corrupt single-source contracts for SpaceX and Starlink, concern about whether Trump is “draining the swamp” or is the swamp begins to manifest.

At present most have remained silent, or are grumbling to one another in the halls of Congress, not wanting to reject a solid base of MAGA cultists who, in 2024, represented one-third of eligible voters in the United States. Since one-third of eligible voters couldn’t be bothered to vote in 2024, MAGA voters accounted for slightly more than one-half of those who cast a vote between an incompetent corrupt criminal and a highly-qualified woman and positioned the criminal-elect for his second Executive Branch crime wave.

We are already seeing some “Buyer’s Remorse”. I never dreamed I would someday be on the same side as Charles Koch and Leonard Leo. And yet here we are. (https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/apr/07/trump-tariffs-lawsuit)

If there are elections in 2026 and beyond, there will not be a blue wave, not a red wave, but a wave of people embracing the core principles of the rule of law, the concept of competent governance, equality, and democracy. A 2026 vote renewing a 250-year-old fight to overthrow tyranny, tariffs, and royalty in favor of reasonable self-governance.

Expand full comment
Gary Anderson's avatar

George, thank you for the thoughtful comment on the professor’s letter. I regret I can only give you one ❤️ for your comment.

In support of your thoughts I offer the following short anecdote. A friend of mine, a now retired Harvard Alum of reasonable means, told me over the weekend that he had never included Harvard in his philanthropic efforts because he didn’t think they needed it but, he made a substantial donation to Harvard to fight Trump. I’d like to believe he’s part of the wave.

Expand full comment
George A. Polisner's avatar

Thank you Gary (and your friend as well). I often write that any meaningful democracy requires an educated, informed, and engaged society. Grateful to all who support and strengthen the foundation.

Expand full comment
J L Graham's avatar

Prudence and decency are getting swamped, and they are pissed.

A wave of people embracing the core principles? I sure hope so. The beautiful and sustaining (even if hazardous) Earth? The vast potential of any "wild and precious life"? Why trade all that for these ugly and destructive games?

Expand full comment
George A. Polisner's avatar

Thank you JL. I suspect many donors viewed the criminal-elect as an easy shortcut to doubling or tripling their offshore portfolios of wealth. They underestimated the scope of damage he could do without any guardrails and a Cabinet full of incompetent sycophants.

Expand full comment
Ricardo Grinbank's avatar

George, had they underestimate anything, they would be complaining loudly. Have you heard anything lately?

They are partners in crime.

Expand full comment
George A. Polisner's avatar

Thank you Ricardo. They truly are partners in crime. I think of their outsized "donations" as investments and/or bribes. Nevertheless, Charles Koch is suing... https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/apr/07/trump-tariffs-lawsuit

Expand full comment
JDinTX's avatar

Lordy, shocking. Are they seeing their plans circling the drain

Expand full comment
George A. Polisner's avatar

I'm not sure they see much beyond what they can steal next.

Expand full comment
Marlene Lerner-Bigley (CA)'s avatar

George, when you have ticked off a Koch and a Leo enough to file a lawsuit against you, well…will wonders ever cease?

Expand full comment
George A. Polisner's avatar

I know, right? I've tried to tick them off for years!!!

Expand full comment
GJ Loft ME CA FL IL NE CT MI's avatar

20 years ago Leonard Leo didn't have a pot to piss in and now he picks the Federal court judges and buys elections for Susan Collins and others.

And in 2016 the Koch brothers pledged up to $900 million to buy elections across the country for Republicans. Two of their favorite candidates were Mike Pence and Ron Johnson. It seems they have backed away from buying seats in favor of funding Project 2025 and other Fascist projects.

Expand full comment
Sophie Nusslé's avatar

Leonard Leo is close to Opus Dei. Lots of money worldwide sloshing around that fascist Catholic sect (a cult, in fact).

Expand full comment
Kathy Hughes's avatar

David Koch died a few years ago, but his brother Charles is still trying to buy the government.

Expand full comment
JDinTX's avatar

I read that David was not as radical as Charles, Charles evil enough for two.

Expand full comment
JDinTX's avatar

If there is anything left. Muskrat and chump are supposedly finishing the destruction derby by summer and then the restoration. And there is a bridge in Brooklyn….

Expand full comment
George A. Polisner's avatar

I like walking across that bridge! :)

Expand full comment
JDinTX's avatar

Want to buy it…

Expand full comment
Robot Bender's avatar

"Restoration." Heh

Expand full comment
JDinTX's avatar

Their idea of a joke or an excuse for stealing every dime from out from under our noses.

Expand full comment
Robot Bender's avatar

And building a Christofascist government from the ground up to serve only the obscenely rich.

Expand full comment
Gail Adams VA/FL's avatar

And a place called (for now) Penn Station.

Expand full comment
Cathy Schmidt's avatar

IF there are elections in 2026!

Expand full comment
George A. Polisner's avatar

And if the results aren't published before hand, like Putin's "elections".

Expand full comment
JohnM upstateNY's avatar

George, while I am pleased at your otherwise thoughtful analysis, I am quite troubled that you continue to write as if "one-third of eligible voters couldn’t be bothered to vote in 2024” when voting was suppressed in SO many ways from severe gerrymandering on to intentional slowing of mail-in ballots via the US Postal service under it’s MAGA-installed director to necessity to “cure” ballots arriving late within impossibly short time windows, especially from overseas, to severely limiting polling places to the outright intimidation evident at so many of those polling places in heavily blue districts to outright burning of ballot boxes to ballot tabulators rigged to actively change voting numbers in seven swing states. You continue the grievous distortions and outright lies of the MAGA Right with this kind of simplistic representation as if "voters don’t care."

Expand full comment
George A. Polisner's avatar

Very good point John. Voter suppression is on full display in the North Carolina Supreme Court vote count, new attempts like the so-called “SAVE” act, and more dating back to Bush v. Gore in Florida.

While the GOP continues to pass legislation at the State and Federal level to disenfranchise voters, 89 million eligible voters did not cast a ballot in 2024. The voter suppression efforts are generally directed at removing eligible voters from the rolls.

Expand full comment
George A. Polisner's avatar

Thank you Roxanna. It would be interesting for every individual who has data stored at the VA and SSA to sue Musk in small claims court for maximum allowed for a data breach.

Expand full comment
Roxanna Springer's avatar

We The People have powers -- We The People need to use our powers!

Expand full comment
Linda Querry's avatar

trump and musk are stealing America’s data for personal gain, and possibly allowing China and Russia to have access! What DOGE is doing is highly illegal, why isn’t he being stopped?

They are stealing the country blind and we just watch? This is insane.

But, yeah Harvard.

Expand full comment
GJ Loft ME CA FL IL NE CT MI's avatar

Yes they are. And selling our data to Russia and China with impunity and using it to threaten American citizens.

Expand full comment
Ricardo Grinbank's avatar

Linda, are you really suggesting that trump and musketeer are "possibly" allowing China and Russia to have access to America's data ?

Think again please.

Expand full comment
Ally House (Oregon)'s avatar

Ricardo, the whistleblower at the NLRB reported a login with a newly DOGE created account and a spike of information leaving the agency. The ISP address was Russian.

There is no "possibly" about it, at least with Russia.

Expand full comment
Ricardo Grinbank's avatar

💯% right Ally, The question is for how long our military are going to tolerate the destruction of our security apparatus in the benefit of our enemies . All the information being transferred to them, one way or another are, at the end, going to be used against us. Thanks for your reply.

Expand full comment
Linda Querry's avatar

https://www.reuters.com/business/autos-transportation/musk-pushes-plan-china-data-power-teslas-ai-ambitions-2024-05-17/

remember when musk stopped letting Ukra ine have satellite access?

do,some more google searches.and have another think

Expand full comment
Phil Balla's avatar

“He’s doing an incredible job. And we stand firmly with him.”

Chaos. Crazy. Unvetted wife joins another top-level meeting.

“He’s our guy.” He’s done a great job getting rid of D.E.I. And religion has come back to America.”

More resignations. More firings. More mis-statements. More lies.

“He’s totally professional. He can throw an ax. His wife can join any group chats she likes. His kids, too, if they like.”

More confusion. More contradictions. More clowns. More back-channel info to Putin via Musk’s incel boys.

“He’s fighting the fake news media. They’re so corrupt. He, and I – all of us – can stand up to them. We’re 100% for America. We’re Making America Great Again.”

More congressional and from-within-the-Pentagon calls to fire the ax-thrower. More chaos. More theater.

“Sure, he had a few drinks when he was younger. Kristi had to shoot her puppy in the head. Couple of goats, too. Too bad. Some of our fake news could use some of that toughness. But Pete – admit it – handsome on Fox. Great tattoos – a real Christian. May be politically incorrect, but Kristi is easy on the eyes. Our blond, apple-cheeked, 27-year-old press secretary also – come on, admit it . . .. And they’re all perfectly loyal to America’s most-needed president ever.”

Expand full comment
Ricardo Grinbank's avatar

Tragic situation Phil. They are destroying America from within at unimaginable speed to the delight of our adversaries and declared enemies. I wonder what our military are thinking in view of our constant weakening as a nation. In that respect and all others, we can't let the regime reach the point of no return.

Expand full comment
Phil Balla's avatar

Yes, tragic, Ricardo.

If "we" rally appropriately, however, we may face the fact that we let our schools down and so left ourselves vulnerable to exactly what Putin and his oligarchs were wrecking on their people, the Russian people, for the past 30 years.

We may insist on schools of sufficient quality -- and sufficient freedom for the teachers (from the deadening testing) -- so that we can with conviction say "never again."

And as to others who used to say that, we may be in a position to put such humane schools in place so those two words, "never again," mean something even for those who never got the schools decent enough to reconcile with their neighbors, never learned to be decent enough to escape the stereotypes which all that testing has only left grimly in place.

Expand full comment
Kathy Clark's avatar

Ummmmm, didnt most of us here graduate from those schools? Think critically, please.

Expand full comment
Phil Balla's avatar

As to their priorities, Kathy, please see Diane Ravitch's "The Language Police."

Expand full comment
Kathy Clark's avatar

Whose priorities? See, please, "The Politics of Language", David Beaver and Jason Stanley. WE are in a new era and it is digital.

Expand full comment
Phil Balla's avatar

I live in the mountains of Kyushu, Japan, Kathy. Getting English books not easy.

Diane Ravitch's "The Language Police" shows how -- with copious appendices -- corporate textbook packagers and standardized testers have gone out of their way to feature neutered language only. To exclude the personal, always. And to emphasize only the abstracted categorical and simpleton causal chronologies.

It's had enormous impact. Many fewer Americans read whole books anymore, even at the best Ivy League schools. Public officials and those in media almost never cite any novels, memoirs, histories, biographies, or essay collections. They can't. As those posting online by far also never do. Doesn't matter if the format of what one could use is print or digital.

Ominously, the damages from what Diane Ravitch documents overlaps with how Timothy Snyder in "The Road to Unfreedom" shows the strategies of dictators who dump the personal, the individual, facts, and evidence in favor of only group consciousness for outrage and easily-provoked sensationalism.

Expand full comment
JDinTX's avatar

Wish it were farther away than it is…

Expand full comment
GJ Loft ME CA FL IL NE CT MI's avatar

Joni Ernst was the 5th vote that could have sunk Hogsbreath's confirmation. Hopefully, the good people of Iowa can get rid of this worthless piece of crap once and for all. That is, if we have another election.

Expand full comment
Phil Balla's avatar

Several women in Congress have asserted their experience with rape, GJ.

And have over and over supported the convicted criminal, proud pussy grabber, and adjudicated rapist.

Expand full comment
GJ Loft ME CA FL IL NE CT MI's avatar

That's the height of hypocrisy. And if they had gotten pregnant from a rapist would they have wanted an abortion?

Expand full comment
Ricardo Grinbank's avatar

For instance Joni Ernst that casted the decisive vote for another women abuser, Hegseth.

Expand full comment
Ricardo Grinbank's avatar

GJ, what you mentioned as "if" we have another election, I've been posting for weeks about my gut feeling that eventually that situation would arise. As soon the regime senses there's a chance to lose the midterm, they would create an incident or incite a reaction from we the people to declare martial law or invoke the insurrection act. Actually it's more than a gut feeling.

Expand full comment
GJ Loft ME CA FL IL NE CT MI's avatar

WWSD (what will Scotus do?) if that happens.

Expand full comment
Ricardo Grinbank's avatar

Nothing.

Expand full comment
Dana Jae Labrecque's avatar

Yup. My exact feeling too. There will be no midterms and a huge “event” will happen Summer 2025. Tyranny of the minority will continue if we let it.

Expand full comment
Nyleen Mullally's avatar

These clowns don’t just gaslight, they nuclearbomblight.

Expand full comment
Kevin Glyn Hearth Girard's avatar

Your depiction sends chills down my spine...

Expand full comment
Victoria E Graham's avatar

How many "dumb blondes" in the administration?...where is that 1 from rump 101?

Expand full comment
JDinTX's avatar

Another puke

Expand full comment
Matt Fulkerson's avatar

So many laws violated, with no consequences. When the Supreme Court ruled that the President cannot be prosecuted for official acts, did they mean just Trump, or the entire Executive branch, even DOGE? Is John Roberts regretting his Federalist Society roots even now? Does he regret the destruction of the rule of law that he and his supposed conservative fellow judges have caused? This is all on them, making Trump 2.0 possible, starting with Citizens United.

Expand full comment
Susanna J. Sturgis's avatar

My question is "Did they mean all presidents or just Republican ones?" The most startling thing about that ruling is that it was issued in the context of the WORST PRESIDENT IN U.S. HISTORY.

The right-wing SCOTUS majority has played a major role here, but I don't think it's *all* on them. HCR's HOW THE SOUTH WON THE CIVIL WAR gets at the bigger picture, but I'd at least go back to what followed the Civil Rights and Voting Rights Acts of the mid-1960s: The Republican Party became more and more white and less and less democratic. This led straight to the Reagan administration, whose coddling of mega-wealth eventually led to Citizens United (2010). The majority in Citizens United (Kennedy, Roberts, Scalia, Alito, Thomas) were all Republican appointees.

Expand full comment
Ricardo Grinbank's avatar

Don't forget the millions of lazy, ignorant and stupid voters voting for him and the 2025 Bible.

Expand full comment
Susanna J. Sturgis's avatar

Lazy, ignorant, stupid, -- and racist AF.

Expand full comment
Teresa D. Hawkes, Ph.D.'s avatar

This is just more evidence that government and business are two different human enterprises with two different purposes: 1) The government works to help The People; 2) business works to make as much profit as possible for each business. It does not exist to help anyone but itself.

Expand full comment
JDinTX's avatar

Who doesn’t know that. Well, smart people I know, idiots, greedy bastards, those waiting for the rapture, a pandemic of stupidity.

Expand full comment
Teresa D. Hawkes, Ph.D.'s avatar

Believe what ever you will.

Expand full comment
JDinTX's avatar

I was trying to agree with you. Sorry if I missed the mark.

Expand full comment
Ally House (Oregon)'s avatar

This is a discussion I've been having in my cohort of retired cop friends (MAGAts one and all) who claim that the cuts to the government that DOGE is making are really cutting out fraud and waste because they do not see the value in providing services. FFS, they were COPS, who, almost by definition, provided a government service!

Expand full comment
Papa’s Pancake Paradise's avatar

Yes, well done, Teresa! And the best way to reverse the “We’re here to help” status is to 1) Declare that Government is awful, corrupt, and “the enemy” and 2) Corporations are legitimate, efficient, and “our friends.” AND, how can we make that switch? 1) Get a “Successful Business Person” to run the government and 2) Make sure the “Information Systems” stop the Fake News and tell the True News. NOW, that’s where it gets complicated: the Information Systems! I grew up with newspapers and radio. (Yikes, I must be OLD.) And, yes, those were Corporations. Now, ANYBODY can be “Information Systems” - Yes, radio, TV, newspapers, but also anybody with a keyboard or a microphone and an Internet Connection, etc. Now, I am NOT suggesting that we ban, eliminate, stifle, or whatever our “Information Systems.” It does help if We, the People take the time to think for ourselves!! Let Freedom Ring.

Expand full comment
Teresa D. Hawkes, Ph.D.'s avatar

Believe whatever you will.

Expand full comment
Papa’s Pancake Paradise's avatar

Yup, I believe that we, the citizens of the United States (yes, I am “homegrown”) are very much being hoodwinked into believing that Government Is Bad (see note at the end of this comment). I had ancestors who fought in the Revolutionary War. My great x4 grandfather was at Yorktown in 1781 (at the ripe old age of 21). The government that was established 250 ago was meant to be helpful “for the People.” Indigenous People, Slaves, Women … yup, we eventually got better at recognizing All People - but we still have plenty of work to do. However, we have now hit a roadblock. Trump is Corporate. So is Musk. On and on! Efficiency is the key! They have organized a Grand Plan - Project 2025, which is 41% completed at this point. Now - can the US government be “bad”? Yes, we have a 250 year history to deal with. Have we had US Senators and US Representatives break the law recently? Yup. Have they been caught and sent to jail? Yup - (but not to El Salvador). Have we elevated a convicted felon (who took full advantage of his DUE PROCESS) to the Presidency. We need BETTER government, not STRONG-ARM government.

Expand full comment
Teresa D. Hawkes, Ph.D.'s avatar

The stories we are being told from both directions have flaws. They are clearly interpretations of the same events that differ in content and the direction the People should take as we move forward in time. I feel we are sorting through the evidence, as we accept evidence, in the due process format which is in our DNA at this point. Hell yeah! That is a help! That is a genetics belief on my part. Do as you will with that point of view.

Expand full comment
Papa’s Pancake Paradise's avatar

SOME people are “sorting through the evidence;” OHERS have already made up their minds. Due process? Both sides? Should they? Yes. Do they? No.

Expand full comment
Teresa D. Hawkes, Ph.D.'s avatar

If one examines the last 10,000 or so years of recorded time in stones, texts, all the way up to digital records, we see a pattern of building and disintegration. I believe disintegration is one of those 'interesting' times. Building is one of those 'fun' times.

Expand full comment
Cynthia Watson's avatar

The Pope showed caring as I want my leaders to care, though I am neither Catholic nor do I agree with the strictures his faith imposes on some. But, he had compassion, empathy, and experience. Others prefer attacking the needs of those these people profess to protect.

Expand full comment
GJ Loft ME CA FL IL NE CT MI's avatar

Billions of people have compassion, empathy and experience Cynthia. He was the head of an organization that promotes the patriarchy and is the reason abortion is illegal in most of the red states.

When there is a Pope that recognizes that women are equal or superior to men by allowing them to be priests, cardinals and bishops and even pope, then perhaps they will be recognized as legitimate.

The Pope refused to endorse Kamala Harris for President. His endorsement could have made the difference in the 2024 election.

Expand full comment
Victoria E Graham's avatar

Until paternal DNA of fetus' and equitable responsibility for the products of conception is law the heritage foundation, et al will continue to criminalize motherhood.

Expand full comment
Pat Priestley's avatar

Truth.

Expand full comment
J L Graham's avatar

He said some of the things that most need to be said; and need to be repeated and examined endlessly.

Expand full comment
Anne-Louise Luccarini's avatar

As the Commander-in-Chief said so movingly (in between introducing his beautiful wife and the cavorting Easter Bunny), "He was a good man, worktard, did a great job. He loved the world. And now (paraphrased) we're gonna have fun!" (and more, in the latter vein).

Expand full comment
JDinTX's avatar

Puke

Expand full comment
Kathy Hughes's avatar

As usual, Trump manages to make it all about himself.

Expand full comment
Craig Gjerde's avatar

And enhancing himself by demeaning his “competitors.” By the way, whatever Trump does as President is endorsed by his personal SCOTUS.

Expand full comment
Gigi's avatar

Did you read the online screed he sent out in the Easter message. His brain is like a pot boiling over.

Expand full comment
Anne-Louise Luccarini's avatar

Written for him by Franklin Graham? Normal grammar, typography and punctuation?

Expand full comment
Gigi's avatar

I guess I was lucky to never know about Rev FG before. Had to look him up. 🤮🥹🙀

Expand full comment
Anne-Louise Luccarini's avatar

Then you know about his father, Rev B G? The man with the Mussolini eyes.

Expand full comment
Burke's avatar

The Press and the DNC are just beginning to realize what stock and bond investors are well aware of: the tariffs are a National Sales Tax. A corrupt tax that is filtered through the Trump and Musk bank accounts.

DOGE is directed by highly intelligent immoral thieves. Hiding behind the Idiot chaos. Deception with focused purpose. And immune from prosecution for their crimes.

The entire Trump Organization is a scam. Designed to steal as many billions they can take. Daily. Until the grownups say stop.

Expand full comment
Burke's avatar

Who has the cojones to say STOP?

Expand full comment
Virginia Cutler's avatar

Pretty sure all regimes require support of law enforcement and military. When *all* the people are in the streets- military and LEOs will switch sides and join us.

Then Congress will remove all of them.

Expand full comment
Burke's avatar

This is a pleasant dream. So we pray. Patrick Henry warned in 1788 that the success of the government depended on only Good Men elected to offices of the public trust. Now we have a Bad Man as President. Supported by immoral oligarchs who bought the Congress. Be aware of what they say they want. Read Yarvin and Browder and Applebaum.

Expand full comment
Pat Priestley's avatar

Well, when a convicted felon, rapist, compulsive liar is elected to be President of the United Staes of America, what else is to be expected?

Expand full comment
J L Graham's avatar

"But Hegseth blamed the media for the exposure of his Signal chats, and Trump stood by Hegseth."

Damn those reporters. No one had to know how reckless intends to be with our national security.

Expand full comment
Ricardo Grinbank's avatar

J L, I can't believed the scumbag president have more than 1% approval rate.

Expand full comment
GJ Loft ME CA FL IL NE CT MI's avatar

"You can fool some of the people ALL of the time."

Expand full comment
JDinTX's avatar

That was what W said and he added, “those are the ones you have to concentrate on.” That’s what chump did and why W has not criticized one syllable. Wonder what Dickie thinks. Any regrets that you gave power to an idiot.

Expand full comment
Marlene Lerner-Bigley (CA)'s avatar

Yes, it irks the crap outta me that Georgie hasn’t muttered a word about all of this chaos! Perhaps, he is involved in this coup? After all, he is an oilman.

Expand full comment
Susan Fernbach's avatar

More like his brain is failing…

Expand full comment
Marlene Lerner-Bigley (CA)'s avatar

George or Donnie? Donnie is just plain mean and cruel. George is painting portraits.

Expand full comment
Craig Gjerde's avatar

But Trump has maybe 70% in the Supreme Court!

Expand full comment
JDinTX's avatar

Chump and muskrat don’t solve problems, they create them. Make everything come crashing down and replace it with something that will give them control over every aspect of our lives. Wonder if the P2025 people have realized that a wasteland is all they will have left. The “due process” rage has been cover for the dismantling of our financial systems. That done, people will scream for a fix, which will be with ultimate control over every aspect of our lives. The only question left is what does Vlad want…

Expand full comment
Lady Emsworth's avatar

How can trump admit he's wrong, when he can never see that he is?

Always a hoax, fake news, someone else's fault. . . an excuse for every occasion.

And no awareness of WHAT is "wrong."

If you tied him to a chair, and held his feet to the fire and said "Is ignoring the law wrong? Caging children? Threatening people?" he'd just look a bit puzzled and say" Well - no, I don't THINK so. . . "

Expand full comment
J L Graham's avatar

the King can do no Wrong. Blaming the victim is Trump's religion.

Expand full comment
Ricardo Grinbank's avatar

And his Bible is Proyect 2025. What can be wrong with that J L?

Expand full comment
JDinTX's avatar

“I don’t know anything about that.” Ad nauseam

Expand full comment
Lady Emsworth's avatar

The things he SHOULD know about, he "knows nothing" about - and the things he knows NOTHING about he's a "Super-Genius" on. . .

Expand full comment
JDinTX's avatar

He knows but is ignorant of what humanity entails.

Expand full comment
Ricardo Grinbank's avatar

That alone shows you how coward he is.

Expand full comment
Dave A.'s avatar

He is following the playbook of his mentor, Roy Cohn, the self-loathing, closeted gay man who Daddy Trump tapped to school Donald on how to be “tough.” Cohn, Joe McCarthy’s counsel during his Red Scare romp, had a simple approach: never admit you are wrong and always attack your opponent. He died of AIDS but never conceded that fact. He was under investigation for massive tax evasion, but fought it until his death, telling a friend he’d spend every dime before he died rather than handing over any cash owed to the IRS. A true POS. Donald loved him (as much as he can love anyone but himself.)

Expand full comment
Susan Jane's avatar

I read that Donald dropped him like a hot potato when he found out Cohn had AIDS.

Expand full comment
Lady Emsworth's avatar

Didn't even visit when he was dying. So deep and heartfelt was his sympathy that he complained to his aides " 'I had to spend a fortune to fumigate all the dishes and silverware.'" after one of Cohn's visits.

What a saint. . .

Expand full comment
Dave A.'s avatar

He uses people until he has used them up. Trump has his own sexually transmitted diseases to deal with.

Expand full comment
Ricardo Grinbank's avatar

Because he doesn't think are all Lady.

Expand full comment
Lady Emsworth's avatar

Oh, no - that's too easy an out. I think he has quite a good brain going there - in a weaselly sort of way. Good enough, anyway, to wriggle his way through the law. . . rather like your average pimp.

Expand full comment
Linda Querry's avatar

Does anyone else remember Pinky and the Brain”, an American animated sitcom about two genetically altered lab mice that plot to take over the world? Well, we are watching the technocrats play it out in real life, but not just for world domination, they want Universe domination, and to get it they are stealing our data, tanking our economy so their bros can buy low, and leaking sensitive information possibly to Russia and China and who knows who they are selling it to, and we seem to be powerless to stop the data leak, but again yeah Harvard,

Expand full comment
Heather Elowe's avatar

Not sure about selling it to China etc. The goal is to create a billionaire TechBro elite with ways to expedite the demise of the ‘unproductive’ populace and maximize the worker bee force. Thiel has been instrumental in contracting with the CIA on surveillance tech and Heather forgot to mention that he is involved with the SmartPay takeover attempt. The data mining is to maintain control over us, to monitor and punish dissent. Do we really believe that the power to ‘kill’ people by f-cking with their social security is just for migrants? It can target anyone.

Expand full comment
KiKi_215's avatar

I am so glad more people are finally talking about this….

Expand full comment
Robot Bender's avatar

Yes! One of my favorites!

Expand full comment
Janis Heim's avatar

Obviously the problem being solved is the collection of data for maximum personal gain. The fun of tearing agencies apart and terrorizing employees and patrons by shock and awe is just a bonus.

Expand full comment