Thank you Professor HCR. Is it too much to ask to have all the Trump tax cuts repealed? Under his tax changes , my taxes went up, not down. I am not wealthy, I am a retired government employee. I see no reason to have our tax laws based on the legacy of a soon to be convicted criminal.
Thank you Professor HCR. Is it too much to ask to have all the Trump tax cuts repealed? Under his tax changes , my taxes went up, not down. I am not wealthy, I am a retired government employee. I see no reason to have our tax laws based on the legacy of a soon to be convicted criminal.
David, we have seen the Republican numbers in the House decline even as they hold a slim majority. We can and should take back the House. While the Senate is a challenge it is doable with citizens paying attention to the most unproductive legislative years on record. Concurrently, the courts and the Republican state houses are attempting to prevail with a scorched earth policy agenda that helps no one, fosters chaos, ignores the will of the people and leaves communities to face violence with both rhetoric and easy access to military weapons by people who are a danger to our communities.
These are reasons we can and must win in 2024. The future of all citizens will be shaped by the decisions made in the months ahead. Let’s march forward and make history in 2024 and 2025.
Yup. Our house of representatives working again and even more openly fbo the electricity/fossil fuel interests and Chinese and other non-American manufacturers. Do they really think we are this stupid?
They don't know or care if we are that stupid. Given their gerrymandered districts and (often) lack of opponents they need not give us another thought. MAGA Mike has never run in a contested race and he is third in line for the US Presidency. He and the others are no different than "southern white elites" of the 1860's discussed in this letter.
Russia and Trump will be sorry if the House actually manages to pass aid to Ukraine and keeps Israel from being a distraction to what it is trying to do to Ukraine. May Johnson see the light after his trip to Mal-a-Lago.
It seems that Mar a Lago has quite the busy social calendar featuring Orban. Too bad Putin couldn't visit but he has a bounty on his head if he basically leaves his country.
LOL.. Aren't they now? Those are right up there with renaming an airport after trump. I hope that idea crashes and burns. I've been getting weekly updates from one of the CT Congresswomen, Johanna Hayes. She lists all the money she was able to get for her district which was needed. She also told about some legislation she has presented. No appliances, no renaming airports.
I agree. Many of us are, but not enough and too many are getting their news(?) from the likes of Fox and the Rush's clones. I've been listening to Sara Longwell's reports based on interviews with voters from all over the country. The trumpian conservatives are incredibly misinformed and inarticulate. I hope they are more intelligent than they sound because all of them were likely voters.
On the other hand, the liberals were well informed, even though many hold very different opinions from mine. Those who might not vote for Biden are angry, but they articulate their anger well. I hope they are intelligent enough to vote for Joe even if they don't like it.
I don't mean to look down on trump supporters because I understand their anger too. If we can get them to listen to facts instead of culture war nonsense, they might just come around. And one of the things they need to both hear and feel in their lives is that Reganomics is why the system WAS rigged against them and Biden's new approach is working for them and will continue to if we give he and Harris another term.
In a conversation with Robert Rich on Saturday, Journalist Michael Pollen said that if Biden wins another 4 years, he will take the gloves off in fighting corporations who are pillaging America. I believe that.
All trumpers see is the high price of groceries and gas. I, myself, am a bit dismayed at the grocery prices BUT from what I have read, the lower wage earners have increased their salaries to accommodate inflation. The thing is if you increase salaries, prices increase, too.
Just because people don't make a lot of noise doesn't mean they aren't listening. In a classroom there are always the noisy ones....maybe If the teacher is lucky 30%. The rest are either asleep at the wheel or just listening. Sometimes hard to tell the difference. But when test time comes teachers are sometimes surprised at how many actually got it. Sometimes disappointed, sometimes truly amazed. I think this year, like 2018, 2019, 2020 and 2022 we'll be truly amazed.
And therein lies the challenge. They aren’t. Too many people, whose very lives are at risk because of these power hungry, my way is right and righteous, callous, uncaring, ignorant, can’t think of what they are to be called, have bamboozled them totally. And many are people who are not stupid, who are aware mostly of what’s going on. I keep saying there will be huge numbers of psychological studies about this phenomena.
The best thing I saw was a comment the other day from someone who pointed to the hundreds of thousands of people who drove and flew and rented hotel rooms, etc. to watch the eclipse, a scientific event, predicted long ago, but many were the same who refused to believe in vaccines or think the earth is flat!
My husband drove one hour to get into the zone of totality. He stopped at a gas station to ask where the town park was and mentioned the eclipse. The attendant's response: "What eclipse?" This was 30 minutes before totality! I'm not convinced that folks ARE aware of the world around them...
Many of my family live in the area of total eclipse. i had to set one of them straight after she posted a conspiracy theory. She did thank me for my post, so at least she read it. Southern Indiana and Illinois....hotbeds of ignorance and regressive nonsense. And based on their lives, I would say a lot of people are busy trying to make ends meet, having health problems, arguing with each other, having children they shouldn't have, etc.
How about people who spend a lot of money going to trump rallies. I am sure they are not free. Add admission, gas (flights, maybe not so much), hotel rooms (what I saw were trumpers staying in tents supposedly used for summer camping or cars). Just saying. BTW it was snowing
FYI when I was in NH for Pete's rally, I stayed in a bed and breakfast, home breakfast including fresh baked muffins, private bathroom. When I got to my room, a fire was going in the electric fire place.
If we're going to do this, which I agree we must, the Democrats will have to develop and execute a strategy to counter REDMAP and treat all 50 states as battlegrounds. There is at least a reasonable chance to grab a Senate seat in MO and boot Hawley if Lucas Kunce can gat some support from the national party apparatus and donors. This is probably true in other races as well, but the constant harping on the 7 focus states detracts from a bigger message.
We have a different situation here in blue MD., Ed. The popular anti Trump Republican Larry Hogan will be running in the General election against one of 2 (of the 5) popular Primary Election candidates (Trone and Alsobrooks) for Senator Ben Cardin's Senate seat. We NEED that Senate seat to be Democratic!
John D. that Comment was an excellent strategy summary throughout the end of this year & putting a final end to sinister Supply Side 'economics' of 1981-2021.
The House is back in Session on Monday 4/15 & the danger of a wider regional war in the Middle East's a distinct possibility. $95 Billion in financial & humanitarian aid to Ukraine, Israel & Taiwan has already passed the Senate 70-29 waiting for a House Vote.
There a number of House ways to get the bill on Biden's desk ready for the President's signature next Tuesday. Steam roll the seditious Speaker's ultra thin 'majority'. Yes, I am calling my Contra Costa County CA Office today & Nancy Pelosi (Emeritus) today to help get it done.
Bring the "Senate Ukraine, Israel & Taiwan Package" to the House Floor for a vote now.
I would highly recommend keeping up with all the court challenges by subscribing to Marc Elias’s DEMOCRACY DOCKET on You Tube too. He and his firm have successfully challenged many of the draconian laws that have been passed in the various states.
So many people responded to this that it seemed only right to steal a link from Jessica Craven’s Extra, Extra! This is an uplifting story from David Pepper about people energized and running for office. Be inspired. Do the same.
Lavinia, you may be right but we must become active participants in the country’s democracy and give it our best. There are many reasons to be optimistic, most of is the groundswell of engaged citizens like us giving their time and $$$.
David, We neither need to nor could we, in the foreseeable future, elect 59+ Democratic Senators to repeal the Trump tax cuts. Currently, there are 49 Senators (excluding both Manchin & Sinema) who support filibuster reforms that would override the 60-vote threshold required for legislation to move to the floor for debate and an up or down majority vote, with the VP, if needed, casting the tie-breaking vote. Accordingly, to achieve meaningful change, we must hold our 49 Senate seats, flip 1 Republican-held seat, retake the House and hold the White House. Only then, in my view, will Reagan-era policy increasingly recede.
The factual presentations seem little compared to the incessant clamor , and doubly it’s not listened to by ‘their base’.
What I see happening here/there steady Democratic wins, steady forward progress in job growth, infrastructure projects implemented and a slowly growing awareness of number losses for Republican support/resignation/donating/abortion stand.
Could it be the ruse is up?
Nonetheless , our own push must stay the course , there is much to UNDO regards to the tax structures since Regan , plenty of area for improvement in our safeguards/laws -Citizens Untied, Filibuster,Voting and Women’s Rights,and in totality Health Care specifically Big Pharma’s influence. Corporate America needs reigned in!
All we need for that is 52 D Senators - since we won't have Manchinema to kick in their asses any more, and on January 3 2025 we can be rid of a filibuster with the Senate Majority Leader changing the rules and leaving it out.
Jack, The Republican-controlled Senate was able to pass the Trump tax cuts with 51 votes through budget reconciliation, which only requires a simple majority.
"Budget reconciliation is a special parliamentary procedure of the United States Congress set up to expedite the passage of certain federal budget legislation in the Senate." Wikipedia
Jack, the filibuster rule works for us when we’re in the minority and against is when we’re in a less-than-2/3 majority. It protects us from the majority party being totally dominant. Sooner or later, maybe even next year, Dems will be in the minority, and Reps will want to eliminate the rule. Now, I hate the filibuster rule, but if Reps take the senate, I’ll love it.
It does provide some stability which is good, but it also can cause a chronic stagnation, with nothing getting done. I doubt that Joe Biden wants the 59 vote rule eliminated but I feel it might be good to be rid of it. I have mixed feelings about it, but I do think we have too many ways built into the system that protects the minority and lately those protections have been abused.
The 60 vote rule can stay so long as we elect a total of at least 60 senators -- a tall task, given gerrymandering. Removal of it can always be used as a threat...
Yes, IF we can get money out of politics, eliminate extreme gerrymandering, and find a proper line between freedom of speech and extreme propaganda (“active measures”).
Yes. The Democrats need a solid majority in both houses and the presidency. If that happens then the crazies will have an extremely weak “rigged election” argument. More importantly with such a majority there is an opportunity to pass legislation that benefits the majority of citizens and not just the top tier. In addition it could be an opportunity to modernize our government. First call for a constitutional convention and second overhaul the arcane “rules” in both the House and the Senate to achieve a truly democratic and representative government. If this happens and if the democratic majority can deliver meaningful legislation that is well executed, then President Biden could become another FDR at a time when we really need that type of leadership.
I’ve been waiting for this column for years! It’s here and the responses are a joy to read. I lived the years since Reagan got rid of Carter and tore his solar panels off the White House, taxed the middle class (can anyone here who didn’t live the Reagan years remember when credit card interest was tax deductible ?), and discredited the poor while doing Iran Contra?
Reagan was a swine, aided and abetted by the loathsome individuals "advising" him. Leonard Leo, the reactionary members of SCOTUS, the Federalist Society, etc., and all their works and policies, are the noxious outgrowths thereof.
Yes...those arcane rules need to be overhauled....especially because they allow one person to hold complete power over our legislative process. The electoral college needs to be eliminated.
Also, the Supreme Court needs to be fixed, and the DOJ needs to stop pussy footing around. Did Garland think the American public would be satisfied with only the prosecution of J6ers?
The first order of such a Constitutional Convention must be to enact the Equal Rights Amendment, ratified by all the states needed over a decade ago. The second must be to propose an Amendment declaring that Americans have a right to privacy in their personal affairs, including reproductive matters, more artfully stated than that, so as to preserve the right to make all abortion decisions those exclusively of the pregnant person.
We have to tell this story wherever we can. Here's my Twitter X post (exactly 239 characters) I'm posting it wherever I see a GOP misinformation tweet about their benefits or Biden's shortcomings re the economy or Trump's support of "everyday Americans."
_________________________________
Here's a different view from UAW President Shawn Fain..."Workers have realized they’ve been getting screwed for decades, & they’re fed up."
How?
Historian Heather Cox Richardson @HC_Richardson tells the story in this edition, 1981-today. Check it out!
What's hopeless about it? I just re-read Prof Richardson's letter. It sounds pretty optimistic to me. She is essentially writing the obituary for the modern Republican -- Re-Qonfederate Party.
Not that those of us who are hoping to preserve a liberal representative government that actually works for the citizens can afford to sit on our hands. I'll continue to work here in West Michigan with the local Democratic Party to increase voter awareness and loyalty to democratic principles . . . e.g. expanded voter access to the polls.
You've heard it before, I'm sure: Democracy is not a spectator sport.
I would also like to see tax on social security income repealed. In fact, social security is importantly being protected by Biden, who along with Democrats wants to expand it and fund it better by including the wealthiest Americans. In contrast, Trump and any Republican wants to lower the amount that people can get to subsistence living level, and bleed it of employees so that people cannot access their benefits because they cannot get any service or help. Then with the money social security does not pay people that it should, they want to put that into lowering the deficit so that their billionaire and millionaire and some soon to be trillionaire clients can save more on taxes.
"I would also like to see tax on social security income repealed." I agree. It makes no sense to tax social security income. We paid into the Social Security fund via the FICA "Payroll Tax". Now, in retirement, some people are required to pay a tax on the money we paid into the insurance fund via FICA taxes on our income while we were working. That seems like double taxation.
One alternative would be for our Congress to appropriate sufficient discretionary spending to meet any shortfall in available FICA income due to changing demographics, instead of taxing us twice on the same income.
For people with little or no savings, the average monthly social security payment is meager. Rents have been trending upwards.
At least one US Senator has been advocating increasing the social security disbursement.
According to the woman who spoke to Democrats Abroad in a webinar on social security for expats, the fund in the USA is actuarily set for the next 75 years. That is it is carefully watched over to ensure that it is fit to meet all obligations for the next 75 years. That it is not are Republican lies that Democrats should not be falling for. That is the USA standard. In Germany it is only 25 years, and the OECD uses 45 years as its actuarial standard. While I don't yet collect social security, it is currently set to cover my lifetime. However, that is only if Trump and his handmaids in the Republican party don't get the majority needed to mess with it. Right now it has a 2.8 trillion dollar accumulated surplus. The money is extremely secure if we continue as we have. What the Republicans are constantly trying to do and did under Trump is 1) cut benefits, so that less social security will be needed and they can transfer it to pay down the deficit (which ironically exists because of the tax breaks Trump and other Republicans have given to the wealthiest among us so that you and I pay more taxes than they do.) 2) They are starving it of money to support people working in SSA so that it makes it hard to get help filing claims and straightening out problems which saves them money too. Money that we paid into it and cannot access. She told us that SSA went from being the best government agency to work for to being the worst, which will mean turnover, time needed to train new hires, etc... which are costs and add to inefficiencies. 3) She told us that undocumented immigrants often pay into the system but do not draw benefits so they contribute to the health of the fund. This is of course unfair and should also be addressed. Overall immigrants contribute heavily to the social security fund and that helps to stimulate our economy. So, we should all be writing our politicians insisting that they pass legislation that 1) expands social security benefits and 2) that exempts this income from taxation, 3) that includes all people who pay into it regardless of documented status. When I get the video from the webinar, I will post the link. I believe it will be on Youtube.
It is why so many of us have looked for cheaper places to live in retirement than in the USA. The downside of living abroad is that as of now one cannot collect medicare abroad. That is another thing that needs to be changed. Still, we have friends that just moved to Lisbon, Portugal as "digital nomads." They told us while we visited them a couple of weeks ago that they are part of the national health insurance which is free. She is currently getting midwife care for her first pregnancy which includes ultra sounds. In Germany one pays around what one would pay for medicare for national health insurance plans at the lowest rate. However, it is hard to get into the national insurance if you have not been here paying all along. They are going to try to push you into private insurance which one should not do. What is cheaper in Germany except for a couple of big cities like Hamburg and Munich, is housing. Food is also much cheaper. Utilities are expensive, but even renters are allowed to hang solar panels from their balconies and tap into the electric grid as both consumers and providers, or to store energy. If you do not insist on owning a car, transportation here is cheaper in most places the public is more than adequate to get you where you need to go with a monthly Germany ticket, which gets you around the country too. I have heard that France is thinking of introducing the same monthly plan. Still, it is shocking that one currently cannot have it all in the USA unless you are getting the high end with 2 incomes, one of which will disappear when a spouse dies. So, that is something that should also be looked at, as well as the fact that businesses are not providing pension, but more like investment opportunities so that your money is put at risk your entire life unless you put it into an annuity, which may have a low yield.
So true, thank you. We did fine until my husband died, then I get hit with a $6,000 tax bill because I am now single. Or so the CPA told me. More withholding so maybe next year will be better, if I live so long. My chat with SSA required a hold time of 71 minutes (after 45 minutes on web site, which finally required a call). Imagine if chump gets in and continues with his “destruction of the administrative state,” as Bannon and chump promised.
I am imagining it, and it looks like, someone displeases him as he melts down but he sees the red button and remembers he can use it in a moment of rage tainted lucidity.
I have been writing that we need to learn from Mother Europe! Thanks very much, Linda Weide, for this post. I am pushing Secretary of Transportation Buttigieg for trolleys in cities and both regional and long distance (based on the TGV which I have ridden over much of France)trains. As for medicine, we are so far behind what I experienced in France, thanks mostly to corporate greed which continues to dominate every aspect of American life, that I despair unless we get and keep Democrats in both Houses for 40 years again.
Linda, your description matches very closely what I learned about the Social Security Trust Funds after I retired in 2010. I have not looked at the health of the fund recently (until just now), but I recall that the Treasury Department reports regularly on the actuarial predictions, and the probability that the Trust Funds will be able to pay full benefits.
I have read various commentaries which suggest that Congress could appropriate funding adequate to pay promised benefits to augment the Trust Funds if they ever approach depletion.
I will look for the link to the webinar you mentioned.
Here is a link to US Treasury Department's report on their projections for Social Security to 2097.
(Edit: A day later I see where I made an error in reporting the main import of Treasury's summary: the "d" footnote refers to DI, Disability Insurance, rather than the OASI (Old Age and Survivors Insurance). I apologize for any misapprehension I may have caused.)
"The projected reserve depletion date for the combined OASDI trust funds is 2034, a year earlier than in last year's report.1 Considered on its own, the OASI Trust Fund can pay full benefits until 2033, a year earlier than projected last year. As in last year's report, the DI Trust Fund is projected to be able to pay full benefits through the end of the 75-year projection period (2097 in this year's report)."
However there are two SS Trust Funds, the retirement fund and a disability fund. As of today, the retirement fund outlays are supposed to peak in 2033. If it defaults, it would have to pay a reduced amount.
2033 represents when the baby boom beneficiaries reach their peak. But that is also when the number of expected beneficiaries begin to decline. After 2034, birth rates of later generations flatten and the funds can be solvent.
Social Security protects workers, widow(er)s, orphans and disabled people and is a major investment for many of us.
Please donate to create an endowment to slow down the rate. If everyone who donates to say, universities, which aren't really charities, the trust funds would be secure.
Also, all income should be subject to social security taxes which should improve solvency of the fund. As someone with ample savings, I would not be opposed to means testing for benefits leaving funds as a safety net for those who truly need it and possibly allowing for more generous benefits. I had too many patients living on social security alone trying to decide between buying food or medicine.
Totally. I think that is part of what Biden is moving towards. Not clear on the details. Should ask Biden to spell it out more clearly, or some Substack. My summer job working in a bank was interesting. I got to see the size of the poorer people in my fairly wealthy university community. The ones who lived in the horrid scattered site public housing for the elderly. This was their entire income and one lady had cat food in her bag and she told me it was all she could afford to eat as meat. It is just shameful that with such wealth we allow this. It is just shocking. So, I still remember the checks being like 120 dollars a month, which just is not enough to represent a lifetime of working.
While I understand the means testing of social security, the reason it has support is that everyone is entitled to benefits as everyone who pays in gets them. I believe there is a maximum benefit and perhaps there should also be a minimum benefit.
I mostly agree, but means testing is a bad idea. First, everyone who pays in should receive. Second, means testing on such a large scale would significantly increase administrative costs.
SS is already at a subsistence level. (That's what kills me...Congressmen who have a guaranteed income and healthcare for life....thinks the average SS benefits and Medicare are too generous. No one ever suggests those benefits should go away....only SS and Medicare)
And if anyone should get tax breaks it should be those on SS not the wealthy. How did our country go so wrong. How did we EVER buy the corrupt Reaganomics ploy.
I knew from the gitgo that Reagan and his economics were SHIT! In fact, my professor of economics was very clear on the fallacy of Trickledown economics. So, I was in shock that anyone, including people I went to school with and knew of as Democrats bragging about being Reagan Democrats. I just thought of them as Stupid idiots. I still do. He just gave them permission to be super rich and greedy and selfish, and that is what their little egos ran with. I could say more but won't as they all sicken me.
Permission to be super rich and greedy and selfish. A cultural shift since my formative years, for sure. Later, there was a show Lifestyles of the Rich and Famous, designed to create envy of the wealthy and give greed and selfishness a good name.
Greed has always played an important part for the Republican party. Along with the corporations and millionaires and billionaires. This how the majority of the middle class was wipe out. The Reagan era and the Republican party plan it this way.
My US representative, Angie Craig, D-MN, is currently working on a bill to lower taxes on Social Security income - Craig was the chief author of the bill that lowered prescription drug prices for seniors several years ago. But we all know what a dumpster fire the House is currently. So the chances that bill would even get a committee hearing are slim. What to do?
Every one who is able, should be working to get out the vote. Field team 6 is the group I work with - postcards, phone calls, texts to remind people to vote and get people to register early. There are many more groups - some local, some national. Registering early will be critical in Republican-led states where gerrymandering and purging the voter rolls are common tactics that favor Republicans
We the people are the ones who can change the outcome of the 2024 election. Please do whatever you are able to do.
I agree with you a 100%. However, Democrats must also emphasize about Medicare and Society Security being cut when their talking to the people when campaigning.
We must win both houses and Biden re-elected to have an increase in Society Security. Millionaires and billionaires would have to pay a higher tax of at least 20 to 25%.
They been getting away for years not paying nothing. It's time for them to pay their fair share.
Now you’re talking. Eisenhower was the first President I knew of , as I grew up and as I recall things were going pretty good back then. Did you know that Ike paid for the Interstate Highway System with cash? That is how much tax revenue was pouring in back then from the rich and big business. Now the republicans want to take money from Social Security and Medicare to pay the bills.
As you point out, tax cuts aren't really a Trump thing. They're a Republican thing. I'm not a Democrat; I don't want to see the country go too far to the left either. But that's simply not something that's going to happen any time in the near future. Republican yelling about Socialism is simply more dishonesty. This next election needs to be a 'bloodbath' for the GOP.
The 2024 election must be only the first of a few decades of elections, so that trumpism, Reaganism, Leonard Leo-ism, Project 2025-ism, Federalist Society-ism, and their ilk, are all consigned to the trash heap.
Hopefully it will, in a peaceful transition if Biden should be re-elected. Trump and his mega Republican party and his voter's can't except defeat. Let's hope provisions are made ahead of time ,should Biden be, re-elected.
And we never hear a word about that. But try to help Ukraine survive a bloody dictator and they have a conniption.
Whe we went into Afghanistan their GDP was virtually non-existent. Their economy was dead last. After spend trillions there we were about to raise their GDP to 171st in the world. Pathetic. Worst investment ever with absolutely nothing to show for it.
Corporations benefit hugely from state and social subsidies. That would include prime facie America's outsized military. And look how well Vietnam went?
I have repeated that this conservative movement from Reagan onward was only and all about money. Deregulation only benefits the producing class. I only hope you are right, Heather. Let’s hope you are. And let’s not forget that so much damage has been done to the people and our government. I hope the fences can be mended. And let us not forget that the negative use of AI will be used front and center to deflect the progress we should make.
Just ending a 3 week trip thru Japan. Where are all the homeless? Why aren’t the subways grimy and smelling of urine? Where are all of the cops? How come no one locks their bikes?This is what happens when a country supports their citizens with a living wage and excellent infrastructure I guess.
That’s why I’ve lived in Japan for decades and can’t ever live in America again. When I’ve visited, all I can think is “How can people live this way? It’s like a third world country,”
I'm (have been for 15 years) in the mountains of Kyushu, halfway between Oita-shi on the Pacific coast, and Kumamoto to the west. Am in a town, Taketa, that lies in the valley, valleys, of two rivers. They meet just at the foot of a very old castle on the eastern side of town (or, its stunningly beautiful castle grounds -- the edifices razed in the Meiji era).
Three mile-high mountains in view here: Aso, Kuju, and Sobo-san, plus horizons all crenellated in ridges of bamboo, pine, cedar, and rice terraces.
I can still remember the eighties when there was a lot of fear that the Japanese would overtake us with their innovations. At least now we consider them an ally rather than a rival.
Japan has been an ally for a long time. Russia not. Now we have a lot more completion by both foes and friends. Republicans don't care as long as money collects at the top.
There were homeless people living in nifty wheeled boxes that were packed up every morning when the people went to work keeping the parks clean or direction traffic in and out of parking lots. We were there in 2009.
The GOP for decades has been an unholy alliance of market fundamentalists who worship the Almighty Dollar and self-described "Christians" who reject the Golden Rule.
I have called the two factions the Flat Taxers and the Flat Earthers, or the Dow Jones and Bob Jones wings, or the Social Darwinists and Young Earth Creationists.
Which they emphasize varies opportunistically with time and place, but they often campaign on religion and govern for plutocracy.
"Fifty years ago, Milton Friedman in the New York Times magazine proclaimed that the social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. Directors have the duty to do what is in the interests of their masters, the shareholders, to make as much profit as possible. Friedman was hostile to the New Deal and European models of social democracy and urged business to use its muscle to reduce the effectiveness of unions, blunt environmental and consumer protection measures, and defang antitrust law. He sought to reduce consideration of human concerns within the corporate boardroom and legal requirements on business to treat workers, consumers, and society fairly. "
If this doctrine is dead, the GOP and its allies seems to have not gotten the message. Or they are clinging to it and suffering the consequences.
I would have to disagree: Friedman's shareholder doctrine is undead. As in "revenants," zombies. The machinery and culture of large corporations still pander to the shareholders.
“Workers have realized they’ve been getting screwed for decades, and they’re fed up.”
Millions of the workers are behind Trump because the maganaizi propaganda machine blames high energy and food prices on Biden. Of course that is a big lie that Biden is any more at fault than Trump is for the high food prices.
Trump's total mishandling of Covid-19 and the shaming of the Fed to lower rates to zero so that he could save money on his debt had to actually be dealt with to prevent a melt-down of our economy.
And the Biden policies have worked. The US has had the strongest recovery and economy in the world under Biden.
Gary, my MNJ friends harp on both food prices and student loan forgiveness. Any time I point out why the student loan issue is interest and policy driven or that record prices are seeing record profits I am met with utter garbage as denials.
I don't understand why the cost of a college education at the state school I attended cost my niece and nephew 7 times as much as I paid. Fortunately, they were both able to get student aid and scholarships so they could complete their educations. I didn't have to since I was able to make enough in the summer to pay for each year of school.
Can you imagine a rising sophomore making $35K in 3 months?
IMO student loan forgiveness is just easing the burden of greed and stupidity by the political class.
Exactly the situation where I grew up, NW Indiana. College students worked in the steel mills in the summer to earn the next year’s tuition and room and board. And IU cost $325 for between 12-18 hours of classes per semester. I think room and board was $1000 per year, or maybe per semester.
I was able to work in a grocery store for a bit more than minimum wage, and with the help of sports scholarship stipends, only accrue about 3,000 in student loans, at a 1.9 interest rate.
You left out one big issue; white working class moved from the Democratic Party beginning with the Dixiecrats and Nixon’s Southern strategy and culminating with s self of being racially left out as crazy as it sounds. Also, Democratic Party foolishly added to this sense of abandonment. Now you have a bigger picture.
Bill- Foolishness is why I can't go full-on Democrat.
And yet, I have only voted for Democrats and Independents for most of this century. Most Republicans prefer to hate instead of love and they are gullible to the point of stupidity. The faux-Christian white nationalists believe the Bible condemns abortion when the only passage in the Bible dealing with the topic says a priest (rabbi) can order an abortion if a woman is pregnant with someone baby other than her husband.
Because why? Voting for Democrats? My conclusion....as I vote the same way.....is because only the Democratic party has any Progressives. They foolishly let Republicans make the word 'liberal' into a negative epithet, almost a swear word.
The Republicans are no longer conservative unless you want to classify Fascists as conservative. What have they done since Reagan that is conservative?
They are repressive regressives and Fascist.
I agree, liberal and progressive are not negatives. IMO - Regressive, Fascist and Repressive are very negative.
I don't understand what you mean by "the producing class."
In my mind, that means the people who bring stuff to market, which they can sell or trade or contribute, whether under radical socialism, a social-credit system, or a currency system.
The non-productive class includes the government, but it also includes the moneylenders, which includes all the "shareholders" in modern economies. And of these three classes, the one that does the best under deregulation is the moneylenders.
Deregulation doesn't really hurt the government, but it devastates the producers.
For well, ever, we haven't made the oil extractors cap their wells when they no longer produce a profitable amount of oil. The Biden administration is requiring oil producers to cap the wells they are taking offline, but 3.5 million are abandoned with no consequences to the companies that raped the earth to steal our natural resources for profit.
Current National Statistics: Well Count, Location, Emissions
There are an estimated 3.5 million abandoned oil and gas wells in the U.S., including plugged (~39%), orphaned, and inactive wells (data not disaggregated; 1990-2020 Draft Inventory of Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks; US EPA (2022)).
U.S. abandoned wells are concentrated in Appalachia and the Midwest, the Gulf and Central states, the Rocky Mountains, and California, with the majority occurring in four states: TX, PA, KS, and WV (FIG. 1).
In 2019, fugitive U.S. methane emissions from abandoned wells had an estimated thermal energy value of 284 kilotons—equivalent to 7.1 million metric tons (MMT) of CO2 with a 95% confidence interval of 1.1 to 20.8 MMT, the highest uncertainty among the nation’s largest sources of methane (US EPA 2021).
I would like to think that we vote intellectually and sure, some of us do but those who collectively identify as one group or another, will vote according to their identity. I ask how could any self respecting conservative vote for Trump? How? Sometimes it’s as much a vote for as a vote against. And if one allows the false images mixed with bad reasoning it fortifies the person to vote accordingly. I could point out a few things I don’t like about Joe Biden but my practical side tells me there is no one else better than he is at the moment. I think now that so much damage has been done to women specifically, how can we lose? But look at the price we are paying.
To take a few words out of James Carville's mouth, '"It's the economy, stupid"; and I'd say it's the 'monopolies' stupid! They are big part of what is putting the squeeze on our budgets, but, unfortunately, the uninformed among us are blaming Biden, when our dear president has been trying to do something about them.
‘She’s going to prevail’: FTC head Lina Khan is fighting for an anti-monopoly America'
'Some say Biden’s high-profile warrior – who’s gone after Kroger, Amazon, and Nvidia – has redefined the US antitrust landscape' (TheGuardian) See link below.
Thank you, Fern. We've already seen Albertsons and Safeway merge; to have them merge with Kroger (who bought out our regional market (Fred Meyer) and have utterly destroyed what used to be an amazing chain) would be a freaking disaster.
Since they're shooting themselves in the foot nowadays to the point I don't know how they can stand up without help, let alone move, that's not going to happen.
Jack, the fact that your taxes increased as a result of the Trump tax cuts is a feature not a bug.
Do you remember Trump holding up the post card size tax return promising to simplify your taxes? The scary and pathetic thing is that some Americans actually believed that to be true.
Our tax code is over 10,000 pages and growing, not shrinking. There are loopholes in the code that affect as few as a dozen people or even one corporation each tax year.
There is absolutely no way that Republicans will remove the loopholes in the code.
I Googled and found this response from Yahoo Finance:
"When 2025 draws to a close, so will many of the sweeping Trump-era GOP tax breaks established by the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) of 2017. While the legislation made some tax cuts to corporate profit permanent, lowered individual tax rates will expire on Dec. 31, 2025, and revert to pre-TCJA levels."
That is encouraging. But there is more to do. Taxing corporations properly as they accumulate enormous record breaking profits for their shareholders and top managers is way overdue. Biden's minimum 15% is a step in the right direction - but not enough.
And taxing what I call the "money movers" on Wall Street is essential. Many rich people don't sell their equities to pay for their lavish lifestyles (incurring taxes). They borrow against their holdings to buy that yacht.
This explains the tax dodge used by the money movers:
The group called "Patriotic Millionaires" is linked below. "Rich people are not the cause of a successful economy. They are the result of a successful economy."
Our taxes also went up with the Trump "tax cuts", as did those of other middle class people we know. This is because they eliminated some deductions for small businesses, and for people who had to travel for work.
Excellent point, and exactly my question. While Prof. Richardson's account of the Biden-Harris accomplishments is accurate and impressive, what is missing is an increase in income taxes to at least reverse the cuts from the previous administration and an increase in Social Security revenue by removing the income cap.
I am all for adjusting the income cap. Anything up to $500,000 K should be taxed, and the definitions of "income" need to include such things as stock options or other billionaire ways of evading taxes (looking at Bezos and Musk in particular).
As far as I'm concerned, the cap can go completely, and the tax should be based on AGI, not wage and salary income. I'm also in favor of maintaining the benefit structure as it is, but there are those who argue that such would make SocSec a 'welfare' program instead of whatever it is now and I'd give that up in order to get their support on removing the cap. I'd also like to see an end to the carried interest tax break for fund managers. As long as we're building a holiday gift list, I'm adding an end to the deductibility of interest on business loans.
Me too Jack: My middle class salary was hit quite hard by TFG's "cuts" and I resent paying for the yachts the top 1% are using as their tax write-offs.
Thank you Professor HCR. Is it too much to ask to have all the Trump tax cuts repealed? Under his tax changes , my taxes went up, not down. I am not wealthy, I am a retired government employee. I see no reason to have our tax laws based on the legacy of a soon to be convicted criminal.
America would benefit greatly from a repeal of Trump’s tax cuts. We'll need to elect more than 59 Dem Senators in Nov.
Also, if we have as little as a ONE Representative deficit in the House, MAGA will run all of Congress again, (even if Trump’s in the slammer.)
David, we have seen the Republican numbers in the House decline even as they hold a slim majority. We can and should take back the House. While the Senate is a challenge it is doable with citizens paying attention to the most unproductive legislative years on record. Concurrently, the courts and the Republican state houses are attempting to prevail with a scorched earth policy agenda that helps no one, fosters chaos, ignores the will of the people and leaves communities to face violence with both rhetoric and easy access to military weapons by people who are a danger to our communities.
These are reasons we can and must win in 2024. The future of all citizens will be shaped by the decisions made in the months ahead. Let’s march forward and make history in 2024 and 2025.
It'll be specially helpful if Republicans continue to show voters their true colors.
Next they'll be writing Acts to benefit home appliances.
My home appliances really appreciate the House effort. Fortunately, they have decided to continue working too.
Yup. Our house of representatives working again and even more openly fbo the electricity/fossil fuel interests and Chinese and other non-American manufacturers. Do they really think we are this stupid?
Yes, they do really think we are that stupid and sadly, it appears those who voted for these house members are that stupid.
They don't know or care if we are that stupid. Given their gerrymandered districts and (often) lack of opponents they need not give us another thought. MAGA Mike has never run in a contested race and he is third in line for the US Presidency. He and the others are no different than "southern white elites" of the 1860's discussed in this letter.
They live in their own reeking bubble. We just bought a new dryer, made here in the USA.
Yes
Maybe Congress should take a lesson from them.
Maybe they'll be too busy passing aid to Israel, which provoked an Iranian attack. An attack using the same drones Russia has been using on Ukraine.
Russia and Trump will be sorry if the House actually manages to pass aid to Ukraine and keeps Israel from being a distraction to what it is trying to do to Ukraine. May Johnson see the light after his trip to Mal-a-Lago.
“Mal-a-Lago” — nice, Virginia: Subtle but effective.
It seems that Mar a Lago has quite the busy social calendar featuring Orban. Too bad Putin couldn't visit but he has a bounty on his head if he basically leaves his country.
LOL.. Aren't they now? Those are right up there with renaming an airport after trump. I hope that idea crashes and burns. I've been getting weekly updates from one of the CT Congresswomen, Johanna Hayes. She lists all the money she was able to get for her district which was needed. She also told about some legislation she has presented. No appliances, no renaming airports.
"While the Senate is a challenge it is doable with citizens paying attention to the most unproductive legislative years on record."
The question being whether the citizens are actually paying attention or not. Hopefully, they will wake up soon.
It ain't government of the people, by the people, for the people if people ain't payin' attention.
I think we are....more than Republicans think we are.
Yesterday my state held their Democratic convention . The numbers seem to show 82%! of the delegates were there.
Last week the Republicans held theirs, and had less than 50% show.
I think there might be hope.
To expand the base, register more Democrats. Register Democrats to save Democracy.
https://www.fieldteam6.org/
I agree. Many of us are, but not enough and too many are getting their news(?) from the likes of Fox and the Rush's clones. I've been listening to Sara Longwell's reports based on interviews with voters from all over the country. The trumpian conservatives are incredibly misinformed and inarticulate. I hope they are more intelligent than they sound because all of them were likely voters.
On the other hand, the liberals were well informed, even though many hold very different opinions from mine. Those who might not vote for Biden are angry, but they articulate their anger well. I hope they are intelligent enough to vote for Joe even if they don't like it.
I don't mean to look down on trump supporters because I understand their anger too. If we can get them to listen to facts instead of culture war nonsense, they might just come around. And one of the things they need to both hear and feel in their lives is that Reganomics is why the system WAS rigged against them and Biden's new approach is working for them and will continue to if we give he and Harris another term.
In a conversation with Robert Rich on Saturday, Journalist Michael Pollen said that if Biden wins another 4 years, he will take the gloves off in fighting corporations who are pillaging America. I believe that.
All trumpers see is the high price of groceries and gas. I, myself, am a bit dismayed at the grocery prices BUT from what I have read, the lower wage earners have increased their salaries to accommodate inflation. The thing is if you increase salaries, prices increase, too.
Just because people don't make a lot of noise doesn't mean they aren't listening. In a classroom there are always the noisy ones....maybe If the teacher is lucky 30%. The rest are either asleep at the wheel or just listening. Sometimes hard to tell the difference. But when test time comes teachers are sometimes surprised at how many actually got it. Sometimes disappointed, sometimes truly amazed. I think this year, like 2018, 2019, 2020 and 2022 we'll be truly amazed.
I really hope you're right.
And therein lies the challenge. They aren’t. Too many people, whose very lives are at risk because of these power hungry, my way is right and righteous, callous, uncaring, ignorant, can’t think of what they are to be called, have bamboozled them totally. And many are people who are not stupid, who are aware mostly of what’s going on. I keep saying there will be huge numbers of psychological studies about this phenomena.
The best thing I saw was a comment the other day from someone who pointed to the hundreds of thousands of people who drove and flew and rented hotel rooms, etc. to watch the eclipse, a scientific event, predicted long ago, but many were the same who refused to believe in vaccines or think the earth is flat!
Selective ignorance?
More like willful ignorance, I think.
My husband drove one hour to get into the zone of totality. He stopped at a gas station to ask where the town park was and mentioned the eclipse. The attendant's response: "What eclipse?" This was 30 minutes before totality! I'm not convinced that folks ARE aware of the world around them...
A lot certainly aren't. But a lot are. (I don't know how the numbers break down at any particular time or place.)
Many of my family live in the area of total eclipse. i had to set one of them straight after she posted a conspiracy theory. She did thank me for my post, so at least she read it. Southern Indiana and Illinois....hotbeds of ignorance and regressive nonsense. And based on their lives, I would say a lot of people are busy trying to make ends meet, having health problems, arguing with each other, having children they shouldn't have, etc.
and they think health insurance is bad now...
How about people who spend a lot of money going to trump rallies. I am sure they are not free. Add admission, gas (flights, maybe not so much), hotel rooms (what I saw were trumpers staying in tents supposedly used for summer camping or cars). Just saying. BTW it was snowing
FYI when I was in NH for Pete's rally, I stayed in a bed and breakfast, home breakfast including fresh baked muffins, private bathroom. When I got to my room, a fire was going in the electric fire place.
If we're going to do this, which I agree we must, the Democrats will have to develop and execute a strategy to counter REDMAP and treat all 50 states as battlegrounds. There is at least a reasonable chance to grab a Senate seat in MO and boot Hawley if Lucas Kunce can gat some support from the national party apparatus and donors. This is probably true in other races as well, but the constant harping on the 7 focus states detracts from a bigger message.
Even Iowa is flippable. Just gotta work at it (only the representatives are on the ballot this year).
We have a different situation here in blue MD., Ed. The popular anti Trump Republican Larry Hogan will be running in the General election against one of 2 (of the 5) popular Primary Election candidates (Trone and Alsobrooks) for Senator Ben Cardin's Senate seat. We NEED that Senate seat to be Democratic!
representatives are good. Maybe the House could get something done with fewer republicans.
I'm going to be donating to Lucas Kunce. He's got a good chance.
I have already as well as Fraische?
I agree!
John D. that Comment was an excellent strategy summary throughout the end of this year & putting a final end to sinister Supply Side 'economics' of 1981-2021.
The House is back in Session on Monday 4/15 & the danger of a wider regional war in the Middle East's a distinct possibility. $95 Billion in financial & humanitarian aid to Ukraine, Israel & Taiwan has already passed the Senate 70-29 waiting for a House Vote.
There a number of House ways to get the bill on Biden's desk ready for the President's signature next Tuesday. Steam roll the seditious Speaker's ultra thin 'majority'. Yes, I am calling my Contra Costa County CA Office today & Nancy Pelosi (Emeritus) today to help get it done.
Bring the "Senate Ukraine, Israel & Taiwan Package" to the House Floor for a vote now.
The Iranian attack may be the impetus to get the House to do what they should have done months ago.
I would highly recommend keeping up with all the court challenges by subscribing to Marc Elias’s DEMOCRACY DOCKET on You Tube too. He and his firm have successfully challenged many of the draconian laws that have been passed in the various states.
Thank you SPW ;I will chec out "Elias Law Group, LLC" & 'Democracy Docket". Also, Attorney Marc can be found @marcelias/X.
Sunday Afternoon Update: Here is Elias Law Group, LLC's Mission Statement:
ELG, LLC is "a mission driven firm committed to helping Democrats win. [Citizens to ] Vote & Progressives make change."
Thank you. I assume Democracy Docket takes a little different approach than our Joyce Vance, a former DoJ lawyer and scholar. (?)
So many people responded to this that it seemed only right to steal a link from Jessica Craven’s Extra, Extra! This is an uplifting story from David Pepper about people energized and running for office. Be inspired. Do the same.
https://open.substack.com/pub/davidpepper/p/report-from-the-front-lines-missouri-17c?r=39h2h&utm_medium=ios
My worry is that I’ve watched Mr Trump con wealthy educated people (yes, some simply greedy) here in Palm Beach and wealthy areas.
How difficult would it be for him to con those living paycheck to paycheck (the majority of the country)?
I’m afraid that he doesn’t need former true Republicans any more at this point; just a populist message.
Lavinia, you may be right but we must become active participants in the country’s democracy and give it our best. There are many reasons to be optimistic, most of is the groundswell of engaged citizens like us giving their time and $$$.
David, We neither need to nor could we, in the foreseeable future, elect 59+ Democratic Senators to repeal the Trump tax cuts. Currently, there are 49 Senators (excluding both Manchin & Sinema) who support filibuster reforms that would override the 60-vote threshold required for legislation to move to the floor for debate and an up or down majority vote, with the VP, if needed, casting the tie-breaking vote. Accordingly, to achieve meaningful change, we must hold our 49 Senate seats, flip 1 Republican-held seat, retake the House and hold the White House. Only then, in my view, will Reagan-era policy increasingly recede.
Thoughtful, accurate, I believe, answer. And that is what I hope happens.
Hoping to flip Florida and even Texas.
https://www.fieldteam6.org/
The factual presentations seem little compared to the incessant clamor , and doubly it’s not listened to by ‘their base’.
What I see happening here/there steady Democratic wins, steady forward progress in job growth, infrastructure projects implemented and a slowly growing awareness of number losses for Republican support/resignation/donating/abortion stand.
Could it be the ruse is up?
Nonetheless , our own push must stay the course , there is much to UNDO regards to the tax structures since Regan , plenty of area for improvement in our safeguards/laws -Citizens Untied, Filibuster,Voting and Women’s Rights,and in totality Health Care specifically Big Pharma’s influence. Corporate America needs reigned in!
💙💙VOTE ALL THE COMPLICIT OUT💙💙
Did they have 59 republicans senators when the Trump tax cuts were passed? I think that 59 vote rule should be discarded. It is antiquated.
All we need for that is 52 D Senators - since we won't have Manchinema to kick in their asses any more, and on January 3 2025 we can be rid of a filibuster with the Senate Majority Leader changing the rules and leaving it out.
I dream, but will Manchinema find some other way to help repubs.
They're out of office as of election day in November
When will the dynamic duo be gone Jeri?
I thought that they would stay til their terms end.
Jack, The Republican-controlled Senate was able to pass the Trump tax cuts with 51 votes through budget reconciliation, which only requires a simple majority.
Which is what it takes to change Senate Rules.
"Budget reconciliation is a special parliamentary procedure of the United States Congress set up to expedite the passage of certain federal budget legislation in the Senate." Wikipedia
Like a few other "rules".
Jack, the filibuster rule works for us when we’re in the minority and against is when we’re in a less-than-2/3 majority. It protects us from the majority party being totally dominant. Sooner or later, maybe even next year, Dems will be in the minority, and Reps will want to eliminate the rule. Now, I hate the filibuster rule, but if Reps take the senate, I’ll love it.
It does provide some stability which is good, but it also can cause a chronic stagnation, with nothing getting done. I doubt that Joe Biden wants the 59 vote rule eliminated but I feel it might be good to be rid of it. I have mixed feelings about it, but I do think we have too many ways built into the system that protects the minority and lately those protections have been abused.
The 60 vote rule can stay so long as we elect a total of at least 60 senators -- a tall task, given gerrymandering. Removal of it can always be used as a threat...
Yes, IF we can get money out of politics, eliminate extreme gerrymandering, and find a proper line between freedom of speech and extreme propaganda (“active measures”).
Yes. The Democrats need a solid majority in both houses and the presidency. If that happens then the crazies will have an extremely weak “rigged election” argument. More importantly with such a majority there is an opportunity to pass legislation that benefits the majority of citizens and not just the top tier. In addition it could be an opportunity to modernize our government. First call for a constitutional convention and second overhaul the arcane “rules” in both the House and the Senate to achieve a truly democratic and representative government. If this happens and if the democratic majority can deliver meaningful legislation that is well executed, then President Biden could become another FDR at a time when we really need that type of leadership.
I’ve been waiting for this column for years! It’s here and the responses are a joy to read. I lived the years since Reagan got rid of Carter and tore his solar panels off the White House, taxed the middle class (can anyone here who didn’t live the Reagan years remember when credit card interest was tax deductible ?), and discredited the poor while doing Iran Contra?
Reagan was a swine, aided and abetted by the loathsome individuals "advising" him. Leonard Leo, the reactionary members of SCOTUS, the Federalist Society, etc., and all their works and policies, are the noxious outgrowths thereof.
What can we do with Leonard Leo who is a threat to US all.
I would almost certainly be banned if I say what I want, but I keep saying to myself the famous/infamous words of Henry II re: Thomas Becket.
Yes...those arcane rules need to be overhauled....especially because they allow one person to hold complete power over our legislative process. The electoral college needs to be eliminated.
Also, the Supreme Court needs to be fixed, and the DOJ needs to stop pussy footing around. Did Garland think the American public would be satisfied with only the prosecution of J6ers?
The first order of such a Constitutional Convention must be to enact the Equal Rights Amendment, ratified by all the states needed over a decade ago. The second must be to propose an Amendment declaring that Americans have a right to privacy in their personal affairs, including reproductive matters, more artfully stated than that, so as to preserve the right to make all abortion decisions those exclusively of the pregnant person.
We have to tell this story wherever we can. Here's my Twitter X post (exactly 239 characters) I'm posting it wherever I see a GOP misinformation tweet about their benefits or Biden's shortcomings re the economy or Trump's support of "everyday Americans."
_________________________________
Here's a different view from UAW President Shawn Fain..."Workers have realized they’ve been getting screwed for decades, & they’re fed up."
How?
Historian Heather Cox Richardson @HC_Richardson tells the story in this edition, 1981-today. Check it out!
https://open.substack.com/pub/heathercoxrichardson/p/april-13-2024?r=eznl2&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web
It FEELS PRETTY HOPELESS. Gawd, I HATE TRUMP. And Mike MAGA Johnson!
Dana:
What's hopeless about it? I just re-read Prof Richardson's letter. It sounds pretty optimistic to me. She is essentially writing the obituary for the modern Republican -- Re-Qonfederate Party.
Not that those of us who are hoping to preserve a liberal representative government that actually works for the citizens can afford to sit on our hands. I'll continue to work here in West Michigan with the local Democratic Party to increase voter awareness and loyalty to democratic principles . . . e.g. expanded voter access to the polls.
You've heard it before, I'm sure: Democracy is not a spectator sport.
\Vince S
Not necessarily. The Dems need 51, Biden needs to accept that bipartisanship is dead and Schumer must kill the filibuster with 51 votes.
Yes, that is definitely true!
I would also like to see tax on social security income repealed. In fact, social security is importantly being protected by Biden, who along with Democrats wants to expand it and fund it better by including the wealthiest Americans. In contrast, Trump and any Republican wants to lower the amount that people can get to subsistence living level, and bleed it of employees so that people cannot access their benefits because they cannot get any service or help. Then with the money social security does not pay people that it should, they want to put that into lowering the deficit so that their billionaire and millionaire and some soon to be trillionaire clients can save more on taxes.
"I would also like to see tax on social security income repealed." I agree. It makes no sense to tax social security income. We paid into the Social Security fund via the FICA "Payroll Tax". Now, in retirement, some people are required to pay a tax on the money we paid into the insurance fund via FICA taxes on our income while we were working. That seems like double taxation.
One alternative would be for our Congress to appropriate sufficient discretionary spending to meet any shortfall in available FICA income due to changing demographics, instead of taxing us twice on the same income.
For people with little or no savings, the average monthly social security payment is meager. Rents have been trending upwards.
At least one US Senator has been advocating increasing the social security disbursement.
According to the woman who spoke to Democrats Abroad in a webinar on social security for expats, the fund in the USA is actuarily set for the next 75 years. That is it is carefully watched over to ensure that it is fit to meet all obligations for the next 75 years. That it is not are Republican lies that Democrats should not be falling for. That is the USA standard. In Germany it is only 25 years, and the OECD uses 45 years as its actuarial standard. While I don't yet collect social security, it is currently set to cover my lifetime. However, that is only if Trump and his handmaids in the Republican party don't get the majority needed to mess with it. Right now it has a 2.8 trillion dollar accumulated surplus. The money is extremely secure if we continue as we have. What the Republicans are constantly trying to do and did under Trump is 1) cut benefits, so that less social security will be needed and they can transfer it to pay down the deficit (which ironically exists because of the tax breaks Trump and other Republicans have given to the wealthiest among us so that you and I pay more taxes than they do.) 2) They are starving it of money to support people working in SSA so that it makes it hard to get help filing claims and straightening out problems which saves them money too. Money that we paid into it and cannot access. She told us that SSA went from being the best government agency to work for to being the worst, which will mean turnover, time needed to train new hires, etc... which are costs and add to inefficiencies. 3) She told us that undocumented immigrants often pay into the system but do not draw benefits so they contribute to the health of the fund. This is of course unfair and should also be addressed. Overall immigrants contribute heavily to the social security fund and that helps to stimulate our economy. So, we should all be writing our politicians insisting that they pass legislation that 1) expands social security benefits and 2) that exempts this income from taxation, 3) that includes all people who pay into it regardless of documented status. When I get the video from the webinar, I will post the link. I believe it will be on Youtube.
It is why so many of us have looked for cheaper places to live in retirement than in the USA. The downside of living abroad is that as of now one cannot collect medicare abroad. That is another thing that needs to be changed. Still, we have friends that just moved to Lisbon, Portugal as "digital nomads." They told us while we visited them a couple of weeks ago that they are part of the national health insurance which is free. She is currently getting midwife care for her first pregnancy which includes ultra sounds. In Germany one pays around what one would pay for medicare for national health insurance plans at the lowest rate. However, it is hard to get into the national insurance if you have not been here paying all along. They are going to try to push you into private insurance which one should not do. What is cheaper in Germany except for a couple of big cities like Hamburg and Munich, is housing. Food is also much cheaper. Utilities are expensive, but even renters are allowed to hang solar panels from their balconies and tap into the electric grid as both consumers and providers, or to store energy. If you do not insist on owning a car, transportation here is cheaper in most places the public is more than adequate to get you where you need to go with a monthly Germany ticket, which gets you around the country too. I have heard that France is thinking of introducing the same monthly plan. Still, it is shocking that one currently cannot have it all in the USA unless you are getting the high end with 2 incomes, one of which will disappear when a spouse dies. So, that is something that should also be looked at, as well as the fact that businesses are not providing pension, but more like investment opportunities so that your money is put at risk your entire life unless you put it into an annuity, which may have a low yield.
So true, thank you. We did fine until my husband died, then I get hit with a $6,000 tax bill because I am now single. Or so the CPA told me. More withholding so maybe next year will be better, if I live so long. My chat with SSA required a hold time of 71 minutes (after 45 minutes on web site, which finally required a call). Imagine if chump gets in and continues with his “destruction of the administrative state,” as Bannon and chump promised.
Did the CPA explain the $6000 tax when your husband died? I am puzzled.
I am imagining it, and it looks like, someone displeases him as he melts down but he sees the red button and remembers he can use it in a moment of rage tainted lucidity.
I have been writing that we need to learn from Mother Europe! Thanks very much, Linda Weide, for this post. I am pushing Secretary of Transportation Buttigieg for trolleys in cities and both regional and long distance (based on the TGV which I have ridden over much of France)trains. As for medicine, we are so far behind what I experienced in France, thanks mostly to corporate greed which continues to dominate every aspect of American life, that I despair unless we get and keep Democrats in both Houses for 40 years again.
Linda, your description matches very closely what I learned about the Social Security Trust Funds after I retired in 2010. I have not looked at the health of the fund recently (until just now), but I recall that the Treasury Department reports regularly on the actuarial predictions, and the probability that the Trust Funds will be able to pay full benefits.
I have read various commentaries which suggest that Congress could appropriate funding adequate to pay promised benefits to augment the Trust Funds if they ever approach depletion.
I will look for the link to the webinar you mentioned.
Here is a link to US Treasury Department's report on their projections for Social Security to 2097.
(Edit: A day later I see where I made an error in reporting the main import of Treasury's summary: the "d" footnote refers to DI, Disability Insurance, rather than the OASI (Old Age and Survivors Insurance). I apologize for any misapprehension I may have caused.)
https://www.ssa.gov/policy/trust-funds-summary.html
"The projected reserve depletion date for the combined OASDI trust funds is 2034, a year earlier than in last year's report.1 Considered on its own, the OASI Trust Fund can pay full benefits until 2033, a year earlier than projected last year. As in last year's report, the DI Trust Fund is projected to be able to pay full benefits through the end of the 75-year projection period (2097 in this year's report)."
However there are two SS Trust Funds, the retirement fund and a disability fund. As of today, the retirement fund outlays are supposed to peak in 2033. If it defaults, it would have to pay a reduced amount.
2033 represents when the baby boom beneficiaries reach their peak. But that is also when the number of expected beneficiaries begin to decline. After 2034, birth rates of later generations flatten and the funds can be solvent.
Social Security protects workers, widow(er)s, orphans and disabled people and is a major investment for many of us.
Please donate to create an endowment to slow down the rate. If everyone who donates to say, universities, which aren't really charities, the trust funds would be secure.
https://www.ssa.gov/agency/donations.html
Is this the video?
Social Security works for all Americans (Saving Our Democracy series)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Eo58N6Ln268
Dont deductions for social security get tax deductions also?
Also, all income should be subject to social security taxes which should improve solvency of the fund. As someone with ample savings, I would not be opposed to means testing for benefits leaving funds as a safety net for those who truly need it and possibly allowing for more generous benefits. I had too many patients living on social security alone trying to decide between buying food or medicine.
Totally. I think that is part of what Biden is moving towards. Not clear on the details. Should ask Biden to spell it out more clearly, or some Substack. My summer job working in a bank was interesting. I got to see the size of the poorer people in my fairly wealthy university community. The ones who lived in the horrid scattered site public housing for the elderly. This was their entire income and one lady had cat food in her bag and she told me it was all she could afford to eat as meat. It is just shameful that with such wealth we allow this. It is just shocking. So, I still remember the checks being like 120 dollars a month, which just is not enough to represent a lifetime of working.
While I understand the means testing of social security, the reason it has support is that everyone is entitled to benefits as everyone who pays in gets them. I believe there is a maximum benefit and perhaps there should also be a minimum benefit.
Makes sense. If we don't need it we can always contribute the money to worthy causes.
I mostly agree, but means testing is a bad idea. First, everyone who pays in should receive. Second, means testing on such a large scale would significantly increase administrative costs.
SS is already at a subsistence level. (That's what kills me...Congressmen who have a guaranteed income and healthcare for life....thinks the average SS benefits and Medicare are too generous. No one ever suggests those benefits should go away....only SS and Medicare)
And if anyone should get tax breaks it should be those on SS not the wealthy. How did our country go so wrong. How did we EVER buy the corrupt Reaganomics ploy.
I knew from the gitgo that Reagan and his economics were SHIT! In fact, my professor of economics was very clear on the fallacy of Trickledown economics. So, I was in shock that anyone, including people I went to school with and knew of as Democrats bragging about being Reagan Democrats. I just thought of them as Stupid idiots. I still do. He just gave them permission to be super rich and greedy and selfish, and that is what their little egos ran with. I could say more but won't as they all sicken me.
Me, too.
Permission to be super rich and greedy and selfish. A cultural shift since my formative years, for sure. Later, there was a show Lifestyles of the Rich and Famous, designed to create envy of the wealthy and give greed and selfishness a good name.
Yeech!
Fir me, SS is below subsistence level! It won't even cover my rent, let alone food, phone, heat and electricity!
Greed has always played an important part for the Republican party. Along with the corporations and millionaires and billionaires. This how the majority of the middle class was wipe out. The Reagan era and the Republican party plan it this way.
My US representative, Angie Craig, D-MN, is currently working on a bill to lower taxes on Social Security income - Craig was the chief author of the bill that lowered prescription drug prices for seniors several years ago. But we all know what a dumpster fire the House is currently. So the chances that bill would even get a committee hearing are slim. What to do?
Every one who is able, should be working to get out the vote. Field team 6 is the group I work with - postcards, phone calls, texts to remind people to vote and get people to register early. There are many more groups - some local, some national. Registering early will be critical in Republican-led states where gerrymandering and purging the voter rolls are common tactics that favor Republicans
We the people are the ones who can change the outcome of the 2024 election. Please do whatever you are able to do.
I agree with you a 100%. However, Democrats must also emphasize about Medicare and Society Security being cut when their talking to the people when campaigning.
We must win both houses and Biden re-elected to have an increase in Society Security. Millionaires and billionaires would have to pay a higher tax of at least 20 to 25%.
They been getting away for years not paying nothing. It's time for them to pay their fair share.
Musk is on his way, Linda!
"have all the Trump tax cuts repealed"
And Reagan's and both Bush's.
Make America Great Again - go Back to Eisenhower tax rates.
Now you’re talking. Eisenhower was the first President I knew of , as I grew up and as I recall things were going pretty good back then. Did you know that Ike paid for the Interstate Highway System with cash? That is how much tax revenue was pouring in back then from the rich and big business. Now the republicans want to take money from Social Security and Medicare to pay the bills.
As you point out, tax cuts aren't really a Trump thing. They're a Republican thing. I'm not a Democrat; I don't want to see the country go too far to the left either. But that's simply not something that's going to happen any time in the near future. Republican yelling about Socialism is simply more dishonesty. This next election needs to be a 'bloodbath' for the GOP.
Yes, This will be their RED wave and they will deserve it.
Linsey Graham: (May 3, 2016)
"If we nominate Trump, we will get destroyed.......and we will deserve it."
The 2024 election must be only the first of a few decades of elections, so that trumpism, Reaganism, Leonard Leo-ism, Project 2025-ism, Federalist Society-ism, and their ilk, are all consigned to the trash heap.
Hopefully it will, in a peaceful transition if Biden should be re-elected. Trump and his mega Republican party and his voter's can't except defeat. Let's hope provisions are made ahead of time ,should Biden be, re-elected.
lin - I'd be happy to go back to the Clinton economy where the US was able to balance the Federal budget for four years - 1998-2001 in a row.
And then W. allowed 9/11 to happen and the economy tanked and the Federal deficits return in spades.
GWB spent $3 trillion off budget to fund the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq.
And we never hear a word about that. But try to help Ukraine survive a bloody dictator and they have a conniption.
Whe we went into Afghanistan their GDP was virtually non-existent. Their economy was dead last. After spend trillions there we were about to raise their GDP to 171st in the world. Pathetic. Worst investment ever with absolutely nothing to show for it.
Corporations benefit hugely from state and social subsidies. That would include prime facie America's outsized military. And look how well Vietnam went?
I have repeated that this conservative movement from Reagan onward was only and all about money. Deregulation only benefits the producing class. I only hope you are right, Heather. Let’s hope you are. And let’s not forget that so much damage has been done to the people and our government. I hope the fences can be mended. And let us not forget that the negative use of AI will be used front and center to deflect the progress we should make.
Just ending a 3 week trip thru Japan. Where are all the homeless? Why aren’t the subways grimy and smelling of urine? Where are all of the cops? How come no one locks their bikes?This is what happens when a country supports their citizens with a living wage and excellent infrastructure I guess.
That’s why I’ve lived in Japan for decades and can’t ever live in America again. When I’ve visited, all I can think is “How can people live this way? It’s like a third world country,”
Where do you live in Japan, Kristin?
I'm (have been for 15 years) in the mountains of Kyushu, halfway between Oita-shi on the Pacific coast, and Kumamoto to the west. Am in a town, Taketa, that lies in the valley, valleys, of two rivers. They meet just at the foot of a very old castle on the eastern side of town (or, its stunningly beautiful castle grounds -- the edifices razed in the Meiji era).
Three mile-high mountains in view here: Aso, Kuju, and Sobo-san, plus horizons all crenellated in ridges of bamboo, pine, cedar, and rice terraces.
It sounds like heaven! I live part of the time in Tokyo and part of the time in Izu. I like the contrasts.
Tell us about living in Japan. What do you do for a living?
I was invited here as an artist in 1980 and have done a lot of things to make a living, mostly related to art.
You are living the dream says this artist struggling to stay afloat in the Northeast USA.
I can still remember the eighties when there was a lot of fear that the Japanese would overtake us with their innovations. At least now we consider them an ally rather than a rival.
Japan has been an ally for a long time. Russia not. Now we have a lot more completion by both foes and friends. Republicans don't care as long as money collects at the top.
There were homeless people living in nifty wheeled boxes that were packed up every morning when the people went to work keeping the parks clean or direction traffic in and out of parking lots. We were there in 2009.
The GOP for decades has been an unholy alliance of market fundamentalists who worship the Almighty Dollar and self-described "Christians" who reject the Golden Rule.
I have called the two factions the Flat Taxers and the Flat Earthers, or the Dow Jones and Bob Jones wings, or the Social Darwinists and Young Earth Creationists.
Which they emphasize varies opportunistically with time and place, but they often campaign on religion and govern for plutocracy.
"Christians" who worship wealth and despise the poor.
'Milton Friedman argued that returning value to shareholders was the primary responsibility of business and suggested that “Greed is Good.”'
https://fortune.com/2020/09/13/milton-friedman-anniversary-business-purpose/
(paywall)
Friedman’s shareholder doctrine is dead
"Fifty years ago, Milton Friedman in the New York Times magazine proclaimed that the social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. Directors have the duty to do what is in the interests of their masters, the shareholders, to make as much profit as possible. Friedman was hostile to the New Deal and European models of social democracy and urged business to use its muscle to reduce the effectiveness of unions, blunt environmental and consumer protection measures, and defang antitrust law. He sought to reduce consideration of human concerns within the corporate boardroom and legal requirements on business to treat workers, consumers, and society fairly. "
If this doctrine is dead, the GOP and its allies seems to have not gotten the message. Or they are clinging to it and suffering the consequences.
I would have to disagree: Friedman's shareholder doctrine is undead. As in "revenants," zombies. The machinery and culture of large corporations still pander to the shareholders.
You 're quite right, that capitalism is a virtual religion in modern American society.
Incisive (and clever) framing, Mark.
More, please!
My first name for you know who was the Pyrite Pretendent, second the Conman-in-Chief, third was the Lyin' King.
Mark, I love your names of the factions! Most clever and articulate.
Well put Mark. I totally agree.
I love your terminology. I am laughing so hard. I discovered I could share what you wrote with several people. 😂
“Workers have realized they’ve been getting screwed for decades, and they’re fed up.”
Millions of the workers are behind Trump because the maganaizi propaganda machine blames high energy and food prices on Biden. Of course that is a big lie that Biden is any more at fault than Trump is for the high food prices.
Trump's total mishandling of Covid-19 and the shaming of the Fed to lower rates to zero so that he could save money on his debt had to actually be dealt with to prevent a melt-down of our economy.
And the Biden policies have worked. The US has had the strongest recovery and economy in the world under Biden.
Gary, my MNJ friends harp on both food prices and student loan forgiveness. Any time I point out why the student loan issue is interest and policy driven or that record prices are seeing record profits I am met with utter garbage as denials.
Very sad Ally.
I don't understand why the cost of a college education at the state school I attended cost my niece and nephew 7 times as much as I paid. Fortunately, they were both able to get student aid and scholarships so they could complete their educations. I didn't have to since I was able to make enough in the summer to pay for each year of school.
Can you imagine a rising sophomore making $35K in 3 months?
IMO student loan forgiveness is just easing the burden of greed and stupidity by the political class.
Exactly the situation where I grew up, NW Indiana. College students worked in the steel mills in the summer to earn the next year’s tuition and room and board. And IU cost $325 for between 12-18 hours of classes per semester. I think room and board was $1000 per year, or maybe per semester.
I was able to work in a grocery store for a bit more than minimum wage, and with the help of sports scholarship stipends, only accrue about 3,000 in student loans, at a 1.9 interest rate.
You left out one big issue; white working class moved from the Democratic Party beginning with the Dixiecrats and Nixon’s Southern strategy and culminating with s self of being racially left out as crazy as it sounds. Also, Democratic Party foolishly added to this sense of abandonment. Now you have a bigger picture.
Bill- Foolishness is why I can't go full-on Democrat.
And yet, I have only voted for Democrats and Independents for most of this century. Most Republicans prefer to hate instead of love and they are gullible to the point of stupidity. The faux-Christian white nationalists believe the Bible condemns abortion when the only passage in the Bible dealing with the topic says a priest (rabbi) can order an abortion if a woman is pregnant with someone baby other than her husband.
Because why? Voting for Democrats? My conclusion....as I vote the same way.....is because only the Democratic party has any Progressives. They foolishly let Republicans make the word 'liberal' into a negative epithet, almost a swear word.
The Republicans are no longer conservative unless you want to classify Fascists as conservative. What have they done since Reagan that is conservative?
They are repressive regressives and Fascist.
I agree, liberal and progressive are not negatives. IMO - Regressive, Fascist and Repressive are very negative.
Who produces? Seems like more of a controlling class than a producing one.
Just an updated plantation system.
Which was an ultra-predatory form of ye old feudalism.
I don't understand what you mean by "the producing class."
In my mind, that means the people who bring stuff to market, which they can sell or trade or contribute, whether under radical socialism, a social-credit system, or a currency system.
The non-productive class includes the government, but it also includes the moneylenders, which includes all the "shareholders" in modern economies. And of these three classes, the one that does the best under deregulation is the moneylenders.
Deregulation doesn't really hurt the government, but it devastates the producers.
I'm not writing a dissertation. Companies want free rein to produce and sell regardless of any potential damage to the environment.
For well, ever, we haven't made the oil extractors cap their wells when they no longer produce a profitable amount of oil. The Biden administration is requiring oil producers to cap the wells they are taking offline, but 3.5 million are abandoned with no consequences to the companies that raped the earth to steal our natural resources for profit.
Current National Statistics: Well Count, Location, Emissions
There are an estimated 3.5 million abandoned oil and gas wells in the U.S., including plugged (~39%), orphaned, and inactive wells (data not disaggregated; 1990-2020 Draft Inventory of Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks; US EPA (2022)).
U.S. abandoned wells are concentrated in Appalachia and the Midwest, the Gulf and Central states, the Rocky Mountains, and California, with the majority occurring in four states: TX, PA, KS, and WV (FIG. 1).
In 2019, fugitive U.S. methane emissions from abandoned wells had an estimated thermal energy value of 284 kilotons—equivalent to 7.1 million metric tons (MMT) of CO2 with a 95% confidence interval of 1.1 to 20.8 MMT, the highest uncertainty among the nation’s largest sources of methane (US EPA 2021).
Excerpt from the Department of Interior website
https://www.doi.gov/sites/doi.gov/files/federal-orphaned-wells-methane-measurement-guidelines-final-for-posting-v2.pdf
Valid point about AI. Let's hope people are aware of this and not be mimniputed into fiction from facts.
Too late they already are. Trump is 100% fictional.
Yes , that my be true but it's never too late for Trump voters to change their
mind, especially for Trump senior voters who depend on their Social Security to live on.
I would like to think that we vote intellectually and sure, some of us do but those who collectively identify as one group or another, will vote according to their identity. I ask how could any self respecting conservative vote for Trump? How? Sometimes it’s as much a vote for as a vote against. And if one allows the false images mixed with bad reasoning it fortifies the person to vote accordingly. I could point out a few things I don’t like about Joe Biden but my practical side tells me there is no one else better than he is at the moment. I think now that so much damage has been done to women specifically, how can we lose? But look at the price we are paying.
Yes , I agree. Common sense and foresight will make people realize this.
To take a few words out of James Carville's mouth, '"It's the economy, stupid"; and I'd say it's the 'monopolies' stupid! They are big part of what is putting the squeeze on our budgets, but, unfortunately, the uninformed among us are blaming Biden, when our dear president has been trying to do something about them.
‘She’s going to prevail’: FTC head Lina Khan is fighting for an anti-monopoly America'
'Some say Biden’s high-profile warrior – who’s gone after Kroger, Amazon, and Nvidia – has redefined the US antitrust landscape' (TheGuardian) See link below.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2024/mar/09/lina-khan-federal-trade-commission-antitrust-monopolies
...and a few more!
https://www.politico.com/news/2021/07/08/biden-assault-monopolies-498876
https://www.politico.com/news/2023/12/30/heres-how-biden-may-cement-his-antitrust-legacy-in-2024-00132756
https://cepr.net/bidens-move-on-bayh-dole-important-first-step-in-dealing-with-patent-monopolies-and-high-prices/
***
Thank you, Fern. We've already seen Albertsons and Safeway merge; to have them merge with Kroger (who bought out our regional market (Fred Meyer) and have utterly destroyed what used to be an amazing chain) would be a freaking disaster.
It's the culture. Trump hates dogs.
They expire next year. If he isn't in office, they won't be renewed.
"They [the Trump tax cuts] expire next year. If he isn't in office, they won't be renewed."
Unless Republicans can get a 2/3 majority in both chambers of Congress, to override a presidential veto,
Since they're shooting themselves in the foot nowadays to the point I don't know how they can stand up without help, let alone move, that's not going to happen.
Cheating, Texas leads the way
Sorry, but Ohio has elbowed it’s way to the front of the “most corrupt” line.
Lots of runners up in the race to the bottom.
Beating Texas is quite a feat. Abbot really wants a VP spot.
All the more reason to vote and participate
?
A soon to be convicted criminal that didn't pay his taxes!
If you are not wealthy, that’s why your taxes went up. By design
There oughta be a law
Jack, the fact that your taxes increased as a result of the Trump tax cuts is a feature not a bug.
Do you remember Trump holding up the post card size tax return promising to simplify your taxes? The scary and pathetic thing is that some Americans actually believed that to be true.
Our tax code is over 10,000 pages and growing, not shrinking. There are loopholes in the code that affect as few as a dozen people or even one corporation each tax year.
There is absolutely no way that Republicans will remove the loopholes in the code.
My taxes went way up, too, but rather than a tax cut I would prefer affordable quality healthcare for all. One can dream right?
I Googled and found this response from Yahoo Finance:
"When 2025 draws to a close, so will many of the sweeping Trump-era GOP tax breaks established by the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) of 2017. While the legislation made some tax cuts to corporate profit permanent, lowered individual tax rates will expire on Dec. 31, 2025, and revert to pre-TCJA levels."
That is encouraging. But there is more to do. Taxing corporations properly as they accumulate enormous record breaking profits for their shareholders and top managers is way overdue. Biden's minimum 15% is a step in the right direction - but not enough.
And taxing what I call the "money movers" on Wall Street is essential. Many rich people don't sell their equities to pay for their lavish lifestyles (incurring taxes). They borrow against their holdings to buy that yacht.
This explains the tax dodge used by the money movers:
https://www.pgpf.org/blog/2023/05/what-is-the-carried-interest-loophole-and-why-is-it-so-difficult-to-close-it
The group called "Patriotic Millionaires" is linked below. "Rich people are not the cause of a successful economy. They are the result of a successful economy."
https://patrioticmillionaires.org/media/
The injustice in our taxation system is inexcusable. It is morally monstrous and it is fiscally irresponsible.
Thanks, Bill. Your Google search gave some very good info.
Trump tax cuts expire end of 2025.
Our taxes also went up with the Trump "tax cuts", as did those of other middle class people we know. This is because they eliminated some deductions for small businesses, and for people who had to travel for work.
I thought those tax cuts were set to expire, but not before raising taxes on the middle class (something his supporters haven't realized).
Excellent point, and exactly my question. While Prof. Richardson's account of the Biden-Harris accomplishments is accurate and impressive, what is missing is an increase in income taxes to at least reverse the cuts from the previous administration and an increase in Social Security revenue by removing the income cap.
I am all for adjusting the income cap. Anything up to $500,000 K should be taxed, and the definitions of "income" need to include such things as stock options or other billionaire ways of evading taxes (looking at Bezos and Musk in particular).
As far as I'm concerned, the cap can go completely, and the tax should be based on AGI, not wage and salary income. I'm also in favor of maintaining the benefit structure as it is, but there are those who argue that such would make SocSec a 'welfare' program instead of whatever it is now and I'd give that up in order to get their support on removing the cap. I'd also like to see an end to the carried interest tax break for fund managers. As long as we're building a holiday gift list, I'm adding an end to the deductibility of interest on business loans.
I love your gift list!!
Now we just need to find Santa.
Me too Jack: My middle class salary was hit quite hard by TFG's "cuts" and I resent paying for the yachts the top 1% are using as their tax write-offs.